Sentences with phrase «side should do»

now since im moving the pipe over about a foot, im thinking just two 45 degree connectors on each side should do the trick!?

To make cookies, trim edges to square off; about 1/2» on each side should do it.

When cooked in a moderately hot pan, a minute - and - a-half per side should do it.

About 5 minutes per side should do, or until there are nice grill marks on each side.

+ + About 4 minutes a side should do it.

It remains to be seen whether the systems set out in the Bill will be effective, but it is a step in the right direction, and both sides should do what they can to support this.

Not exact matches

«I think what we need to do is really to start negotiations and to see how we do this withdrawal; if a transition is needed, making a transition that is not causing economic damage (for either side),» Verhofstadt said, adding that it was only then that both parties should consider their future relationship.

Matt Bruenig found the same basic problems with the Liu and Hanauer piece that I did; he recognizes that «when the economy is operating at capacity and there are no idle resources, reducing inequality should not have any demand - side stimulative effects».

All of this is being done while trying to simultaneously educate clients on both sides of its business about why anyone should get excited about yet another «paradigm shift» in an online space where someone's almost always hawking the next big thing.

But if you're convinced you should join the growing subset of Americans who are making some money on the side, how do you do it?

His most amusing gambits include making sure you visibly flinch at the other side's proposals, and that at the close of a negotiation that you feel you've won, you should say something like, «Wow, you did a fantastic job negotiating that.

Amid the terror and aggressiveness then of government and military leaders on both sides, little or no thought was given what to do with the warheads should the risk of mass annihilation ebb.

On the flip side, doing more should also be part of any business.

If you don't have a fear of heights, you should stay in this transparent pod, one of three suspended on the side of an Andean cliff.

What it really did, in Laozian terms, was generate an entirely new world, one in which we now take for granted that personal computers should always be by our side.

Your money from your side hustle is best stashed in a high - yield savings account, where it can serve as an emergency fund (ICYMI, you should always have between four to seven months» of expenses in case things don't go as planned).

Sam, on a related note can you do an article if the side business should be set up as an LLC, S corp or C Corp to shield earnings from taxes if you as the owner are the only «employee» of the corporation.

Zuckerberg is in Washington D.C., everyone says something must be done, and critically, both sides have ideas about what that should be; while this certainly may be mostly a Facebook problem, the rest of the industry should take note.

Investors willing to do a little more analysis, however, will quickly see that both are facing external issues that could have a material impact on their business outlooks for years to come, which is why most investors should err on the side of caution with this pair.

Just because a stock is popular and everyone seems to be choosing sides doesn't mean that investors should force themselves into a bullish or bearish thesis for fear of missing out on a big move.

People can also cancel 5 days in advance for a full refund on Airbnb so you should consider it side income, don't count on it to pay your mortgage or your holidays.

«The Greeks should implement now what they promised to do, and need to specifically chorus from taking one particular - sided steps,» Germany's Wolfgang Schaeuble advised reporters.

The other side the coin is having a partner whose interests are not aligned with you, is not a value add investor, does not understand your business, and has completely different ideas about what the direction of the company should be.

The water, food, housing, medical and education side of aid to the poor we should be doing anyway if our heart is in the right place.

It is completely crazy to think an elite scientific organization should have to employ someone who doesn't believe in science... the even scarier part is I wouldn't be very surprised if the religious side wins this case.

I feel very confident that they don't need civilian activists of either side to decide for them what they should or shouldn't listen to.

(Also, this is a good time for a reminder that if you wouldn't want your Meemaw to see your profile photo, it probably doesn't represent your best side and maybe you should consider changing it.)

While I don't think that a chaplin should preach, a dying person needs to know that God loves them and is waiting for them on the other side.

You did well and should be proud at your skills of pretending to play different sides / viewpoints.

BTW — I should be clear; I am not intending to refer to homsexuals as sexual deviants, I didn't mean for my comment to enter into that side of the debate.

There are so many things that people believe in or don't believe in, we each have our own ways, we should not take that away from anyone, nor should they take from us.As for our United States Flag, that is our Flag, put yours side by side with ours and it can be the United States Flags and combine our believes / sayings.

Intelligent discourse, even with people with whom one disagrees, should be done with humility and respect — even if the other side is not exhibiting the same humility and respect.

(It should be noted that late tern abortions make up a very small percentage of abortions, as do cases of rape and incest... so both sides tend to appeal to rare cases in debates.)

''... 98 % of the world's population sides with my view...» A majority share your view that there is a god, the majority do not believe in your god — that alone should be a warning sign that your religion is not correct.

For example, Moses Stuart of Andover Seminary in Massachusetts (who was sympathetic to the eventual emancipation of American slaves, but was against abolition), published a tract in which he pointed to Ephesians 6 and other biblical texts to argue that while slaves should be treated fairly by their owners, abolitionists just didn't have Scripture on their side and «must give up the New Testament authority, or abandon the fiery course which they are pursuing.»

We'll do it like this: Each of you should have received a large card, red on one side, green on the other.

She should certainly not become one sided, expecting everything from a gimmick, but she must not want to do everything with the same energy either; she must have the courage to concentrate her finite powers on a few points, even though this will mean giving up other important things.

The discomfort with standing side by side with somebody who doesn't believe in Jesus is depressing to me, because how are we going to be a people on mission to the whole world if we can't march beside people and say, «Yeah, you should be able to able to live and not be afraid of police, but only if you're a Christian.»

and i certainly think you should use your irish name with pride, also you don't really have to bring up the WASP side.

For one side, to warn people they should expect nothing of this world, because what is offered with the kingdom has nothing to do with the present life.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

But foreign policy, of course, is largely a matter of prudence, and there are and should be good Catholics on both sides of issues such as what to do about Iran's nuclear ambitions.

However, I do hope that this pastor doesn't get executed, and if he does his death should not be forgotten or pushed to the side.

As Luther's explanations to the commandments always start: we should fear and love God so we don't do this or that, but instead do... There are the two sides.

I also on the flip - side don't want to play according to others rules and demand either, like by political correctness, dismissing some real facts and truth, or being told by what I call liberal fascist and others how I should think, live, eat, read, or believe.

To be sure, anything can be done to excess, but one should not protest too much when excess is on the side of good intentions — or at least of intentions that we feel obliged to construe as good.

God was invented by man so that he could feel he has a force of infinite power on his side; to allow him to feel righteous in judging others who's patterns of living don't match their own; and to give us reassurance that there should be life after death.

I believe in God / Jesus and think we should let others choose their own path, err on the side of caution and love everyone, feed / clothe the poor, heal the sick — just like Jesus would do.

Those who say that they do not have the time to spare for these activities can ask themselves who then should be engaging in it and, if they do not, then who is going to ensure the survival of the Church when it is being pilloried, if not indeed persecuted on all sides.

If I remember correctly, he basically said that both sides of the debate genuinely think that they are doing the best thing for the cause of Christ, and so we should give each other some grace as we both fight for what we think is right.