Sentences with phrase «sides arguing this point»

Not exact matches

With more than $ 1.2 billion backing it and Intel at its side, Cloudera claims the most widely adopted Hadoop technology in the world — although Hortonworks (which got $ 50 million from Hewlett - Packard (HPQ) over the summer) and MapR Technologies would probably argue the point.

On a side note, when I make this argument, sometimes people argue the point.

«I'd argue it's more on the psychological side of things, whereby people see a new major policy pointed at the housing market and take a bit of a step back, temporarily reassess where they are in the marketplace before perhaps moving back into the market.»

In fairness, Nick of Sure Dividend uses the Sharpe Ratio and research by Kenneth French to argue on the side of dividend stocks and makes some good points.

It basically contradicts itself on every single moral message, so can be used to argue any side of any point.

For example, Moses Stuart of Andover Seminary in Massachusetts (who was sympathetic to the eventual emancipation of American slaves, but was against abolition), published a tract in which he pointed to Ephesians 6 and other biblical texts to argue that while slaves should be treated fairly by their owners, abolitionists just didn't have Scripture on their side and «must give up the New Testament authority, or abandon the fiery course which they are pursuing.»

Romney has taken the time to inform himself about the issues to the point that he can argue both sides of any issue better than most of his Republican opponents can argue any side of anything.

Contradicted tenets that allow the fundamental to argue whatever point they want, including war, from their little book, because just about all points of view and «sides» are represented there.

So far I have argued three points: that persons engage in behavior patterns which can be characterized as purposive, i. e., as exhibiting a structure of aims, values, and methods of attainment; that individuals and institutions are interrelated, with each side influencing and being influenced by the purposes and activities of the other, although with neither being in any way reducible to or explicable solely in terms of the other; and that the institutional pole in this interaction shares with the individual as its opposite those characteristics that define its behavioral patterns as purposive.

Though many Calvinists argue that double predestination is the only logical conclusion to the Calvinist position on God's election of some (but not all) to receive eternal life, I am not going to belabor the point or try to refute the idea since most Calvinists claim that they do not teach or believe it... (for more on reprobation and double predestination I recommend this book: Vance: The Other Side of Calvinism, pp, 250 - 333).

I would argue that it is an important part of recognising the other side of any position as well as one's own point of view.

We can go back as far as Kierkegaard to find these roots, but our focus is more well placed in Jean Baudrillard's theories that argue for a heightened abstractness within culture pointing us to the negative side of an intertextual world view where meaning is paradoxically contained in and unbound by deferánce.

If you really want to agrue this point at any time to anybody then you need to know the facts on both sides so you have knowledge about what you are arguing about.

The counselor, after listening to them argue from their own points of view suggested that they reverse roles and argue for the other side.

The current game of «Capture the Flag» is a case in point, with one side arguing «my country right or wrong» and the other side arguing «America: change it or lose it.»

In his book, Campolo follows a distinct pattern» first, he somewhat apologetically admits that he holds to the «conservative» and «traditional» point of view; then he argues persuasively for the other side; and finally he hints suggestively that young and progressive Christians have moved beyond him on issues like abortion, homosexuality, and premarital sex.

One of my own teachers told me a long time ago to be sure to understand all sides of an argument (and my extension is even to the point to argue in FAVOR of the other side).

This is purely a political topic where it seems that many people seem to be speaking out of both sides of the their mouths to argue their point.

I read all the exchanges here and in my view theres fair points made on both sides, the overriding point here is that we DO NEED to improve in everal key area's and while it seems that last night was a real point in fact to argue that case I really don't feel that we are going to make those key changes this summer.

When I see this again I feel riled and am more inclined to argue a point with someone from your side.

Being likened to Ashley Cole is a huge talking point, with the former England international having been a key cog in the famous Invincibles side of 2004, before going onto win further honours with Chelsea including both European club trophies, and could have been argued to be the best left - back in the world for a number of years.

While one political side routinely points to massive, European - style budget cuts (known as Austerity) as the answer to our fiscal problems, others have argued that the best way to stimulate the economy is through a balanced approach which includes both cuts and revenue increases.

If they manage neither, it will be difficult to argue this side hasn't been weakened — and Klopp's stubbornness, which has gotten him into trouble in the past, will be pointed to as a cause given he will be the one who chose to sanction the Coutinho sale when the club had previously shown the will to hold on to him.

And there is a whole other side that one could argue at some point catering to every single cry can also be harmful later in life (at least when the baby gets older).

But that new information and communications technologies aren't all - powerful or irrelevant doesn't mean that they do not matter — or that their sometimes exaggerated positive sides actually distract us from recognizing their more nefarious aspects, as people like Morozov sometimes come close to arguing, as pointed out by Zeynep Tufekci in her thoughtful review of his book.

Those that would argue the other side would point out that a catastrophic plan is a pretty poor plan to begin with.

My point is simply this: why argue so vehemently against someone who seems to be pretty much on your side of the health argument?

Folks will argue about the barriers as well, but I think of the Waterfront as anything along the North End side of the HarborWalk, until Fort Point and the beginning of Seaport.

He argues that 8 mm has too much of a home movie feel, and 35 mm is quickly becoming indistinguishable from digital, using side by side comparisons of Michael Fassbender to make his point.

As online learning gains share and transforms our education system, for some time I have argued that foundations and philanthropists would be wise to spend their dollars in moving public policy, creating proof points, and the like to create smarter demand and not invest on the supply side in the technology products and solutions themselves.

Many other blogs and such out there want to paint a picture of one side being uglier than the other or argue why both have a point.

Unlike simple argumentative essay, which argues only one point of view, this type presents both sides of the argument without author appealing to any of the sides.

Whilst some literature is pointing at the side effects of these devices, others argue for them being useful and humane tools (4).

A fine game, and one of my favorites, but when engaged in a battle for technological supremacy, a black - and - white (or «creamed spinach color,» as SEGA was keen to point out) title with a slower pace than normal wasn't the first thing you wanted to go to on the playground when arguing over which side was better, particularly against a full - fledged console title.

However, on the flip side, you could argue that any game 343 would have put out at this point might not have lived up to expectations.

If there is one comment that makes a strong argument on a particular point and many comments that argue the opposite side of that point with weak technical or purely emotional arguments who wins?

The second example had only one side presenting a very clearly argued point in the peer - reviewed literature.

To the contrary, Bob argues, three of the points on the right side of Homann's diagram are the questions he thinks are most important and which should be answered in a lawyer bio:

Further the points we wished to establish were much more effectively proven when they came from the testimony of the other's side's witnesses — as the other side can't really argue her own witnesses are not credible.

A fervent supporter of the Leave side might go to court in the UK (or a fervent Anglophobe might go to court in France) to argue this point.

On the contrary, it is the daily practice of this court, and of all appellate courts where they reverse the judgment of an inferior court for error, to correct by its opinions whatever errors may appear on the record material to the case, and they have always held it to be their duty to do so where the silence of the court might lead to misconstruction or future controversy and the point has been relied on by either side and argued before the court.

In reaching any opinion, courts generally examine an area of law, looking at all elements of a cause of action which will naturally contain some points that can be argued in favor of either side.

Of course I presented 1 side... I am arguing my point not his.