Not exact matches
The
debate will continue until Election Day
in November and well beyond, and this year's Top States study has
given both
sides plenty of ammunition.
To be fair, both
sides of the gender
debate have been guilty of sliding down a slippery slope, which
in my view is unnecessary,
given the wealth of excellent resources available to help us accurately interpret Scripture on issues related to gender, sexuality, and faith.
«The intrinsic value of human life,» Bailey goes on, «is a
given for all
sides in this
debate.»
Debates about this will easily generate much more heat than light unless the energy of both
sides is focused on the right question, which is: «
Given that 200,000 abortions a year is far too many, how can a deliverable change
in the law most effectively reduce that number?»
Whether such big - money signings are necessary is up for
debate given the level that Ernesto Valverde has his
side playing at right now, as they lead the way
in La Liga with a four - point gap to their nearest rivals and they sit top of their Champions League group.
Third, acknowledging that some of the blame for the biased and one -
sided media reporting on head injuries rests with some members of the scientific community who issue one -
sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization»
in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately, of the intense competition for grant money
in Concussion, Inc.),
gives way to greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth
debates at large academic conferences.
«It is the case
in Oxford and Cambridge Union
debating contests that the competitors are
given one
side of the argument to
debate blind, and so may have to argue a case they oppose, as I remember from my own first year efforts at Oxford» What a curious remark to make!
«The CFB's
debate program aims to
give New York City voters the opportunity to compare candidates
side by
side in preparation for Election Day.
In any event, both or all sides should realize that the best in the business should be given opportunity to question both at length, if not in a herd debate, at least on Cap Tonigh
In any event, both or all
sides should realize that the best
in the business should be given opportunity to question both at length, if not in a herd debate, at least on Cap Tonigh
in the business should be
given opportunity to question both at length, if not
in a herd debate, at least on Cap Tonigh
in a herd
debate, at least on Cap Tonight.
The survey, done from Jan. 21 to Feb. 13,
gave some support to both
sides in the U.S. government budget
debate.
In addition to
giving Collins's
side of the
debate a boost, this high - level endorsement of the Bermuda rules may have an impact on discussions within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).
He could have shown that we can
give both
sides in the great stem cell
debate what they want — the promise of stem cell science, without the moral stain of embryo killing.
This means no matter what
side you fall on
in a
given debate, you have an avenue to partner for change with other individuals who feel the same way.
Lip - service is
given to the wacko fundies and the pro-science liberals arrayed on opposite
sides of the
debate, though I can't help but wonder if the interesting movie
in Closer to God is a Dawn of the Planet of the Apes - style genre exercise that uses its platform to think rather than moderately thrill.
on The Other
Side of the Story with Janice Hardy Helpful Books for the Writing Process by Michelle Ule on Books & Such Literary Agency blog 3 Tips for Writing Heavy Emotional Scenes by Jami Gold Don't Cheat the Reader by Sally Apokedak on Novel Rocket How to Infuse Your Writing with Nostalgia by Frank Angelone on Copyblogger The Secrets Behind Buried Dialogue: Part One and Part Two by Lynette Labelle Crafting Multi-Layered Characters by Marissa Graff on Adventures
in YA & Children's Publishing Writing Futuristic Fiction in (What Feels Like) a Science Fiction World by Imogen Howson on Pub (lishing) Crawl How to Spot Mary Sue in Your Writing by Ava Jae Taking the Road Less Taken (With Your Characters), guest post by Kristen Callihan on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy The Ending Debate: Make Mine Hopeful by Marcy Kennedy Unusual Inspiration: Character Arcs Made Easy by Fae Rowen on The Writers In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Give Characters Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino on Moody Writi
in YA & Children's Publishing Writing Futuristic Fiction
in (What Feels Like) a Science Fiction World by Imogen Howson on Pub (lishing) Crawl How to Spot Mary Sue in Your Writing by Ava Jae Taking the Road Less Taken (With Your Characters), guest post by Kristen Callihan on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy The Ending Debate: Make Mine Hopeful by Marcy Kennedy Unusual Inspiration: Character Arcs Made Easy by Fae Rowen on The Writers In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Give Characters Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino on Moody Writi
in (What Feels Like) a Science Fiction World by Imogen Howson on Pub (lishing) Crawl How to Spot Mary Sue
in Your Writing by Ava Jae Taking the Road Less Taken (With Your Characters), guest post by Kristen Callihan on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy The Ending Debate: Make Mine Hopeful by Marcy Kennedy Unusual Inspiration: Character Arcs Made Easy by Fae Rowen on The Writers In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Give Characters Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino on Moody Writi
in Your Writing by Ava Jae Taking the Road Less Taken (With Your Characters), guest post by Kristen Callihan on The Other
Side of the Story with Janice Hardy The Ending
Debate: Make Mine Hopeful by Marcy Kennedy Unusual Inspiration: Character Arcs Made Easy by Fae Rowen on The Writers
In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Give Characters Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino on Moody Writi
In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants
Give Characters Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino on Moody Writing
Whereas once ``... it is an established rule of the Society, to which they will always adhere, never to
give their opinion as a body upon any subject either of Nature or of Art, that comes before them», now the Royal Society plays an active role
in the
debate, coming at it from only one
side, without adequate acknowledgement of the lack of unanimity within the fellowship.
I can imagine reading really good treatises 20 years from now on «availability cascade»; and still the majority of influence
in public policy
debate will be to persuade people that «the other
side» is
giving in to cognitive fallacies.
And yet, with the sole exception of CBS» «Face the Nation,» all of the major networks got tripped up by the false balance trap:
in the interest of showing «both
sides» of the climate
debate, they
gave a platform to people who «feel,» against all scientific evidence, that man - made climate change isn't real, thus feeding into the fallacy that it's something that can be
debated at all.
It does not appear to me that the use of intimidation is anything like symmetrical
in the climate «
debate,» which makes sense
given the style and content of commentators such as Limbaugh, for which there is no functional equivalent on the
side of the mainstream science.
Perhaps because of my experiences as a British student and, knowing of the strong objections of British geophysics grandees like Sir Harold Jeffreys (not to mention Leslie Moore), I had assumed that there was a fair
debate between advocates and rejectionists on both
sides of the Atlantic, with the advantage on both
sides given to the rejectionists until the data on the oceans turned the tide
in the 1960s.