Sentences with phrase «sides of a particular issue»

We work hard to present all sides of a particular issue.

We work hard to present all sides of a particular issue.

Not exact matches

The underlying fundemental philosophy that shades one's particular side of this issue is: Either you're personally OK with paying your taxes to help the poor OR you don't want to pay to help the poor... it's that simple.

The Red Devils have struggled with the right - hand side of their defence in particular during pre-season and manager Louis van Gaal flagged up the issue in the aftermath of the game against Ligue 1 giants Paris Saint - Germain.

As you read, keep in mind that there are true believers arguing on both sides of the issue, and that the best school is the one that is a good match for a particular child at a particular time in his or her life.

I agree, however, with one point that's sometimes made on the other side of this particular debate, that our main focus in Parliament should be on issues that affect everyone, straight or gay.

The flip side, according to this view, is that Clinton accentuated too many issues that appeal to a narrower band of upper - middle - class college - educated voters, women in particular — things like paid family leave and pay equity.

Identifying Conflicts of Interest I realize that it's important to present both sides of an issue, but Dr. Wulf Utian and his North American Menopause Society (NAMS) are funded by the drug industry, and in particular by those whose bottom line is most threatened by bioidentical hormones.

Patrick McCarthy, former WWD editorial director said in 2003, «She can look at two or more sides of any issue from any particular angle, in a discussion with Bridget about anything she will always bring up the counter argument before you get to it.»

The debate was hosted by Intelligence Squared US, a non-profit whose mission is to host debates that give both sides a chance to present their arguments so people can decide for themselves how they feel about a particular issue, whether it's dating, politics, the effects of technology, or any number of challenges we face today.

But this time, being Anna's first Emmys following the announcement that she and Chris Pratt have separated, with Allison by her side, holding her hand, with her arm around her, for Anna it might have felt like less of a spotlight on that particular issue.

In recent years, I have found myself on both sides of this issue, depending on the needs of the child at that particular time and also looking at the whole child.

On this particular issue of climate change, the Times will have to shift, in my view, from the normal journalistic paradigm (e.g., try to give equal coverage to both «sides» of a story; communicate stories in a muted way by avoiding most words that convey passion and weight; rotate the news so that even important topics only see the front page once in awhile; keep views to the back pages; avoid upsetting big advertisers too much; and so forth) to what might be called a «wisdom paradigm» (face problems, understand problems, communicate your views loudly and up front, address problems, and so forth).

(Note: I think the very idea of two sides is ridiculous given the complexity of the issue; I'm just trying to keep this particular point simple.)

Our intention is not to campaign on any particular issue, but rather to present both sides of the argument on issues which are often highly controversial.»

One of the core issues for the chemical industry on both sides of the Atlantic will be the extent to which TSCA reform (in particular the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act amending the US Toxic Substances Control Act) will lead, or not, to a convergence of chemical policy with EU law in the future.

Similar issues have been explored on our side of the border, with National Magazine highlighting some of the concerns raised by lawyers here about how our privacy is being compromised as well, focusing in particular on increased powers under Bill C - 21, An Act to Amend the Customs Act and Bill C - 23, Preclearance Act, 2016.

There are two practice points to take note of from this decision: (1) even though it is not in the Rules, the Divisional Court has an «administrative practice» that counsel should be aware of that requires leave to file a reply factum, and (2) when a party is drafting their factum, they need to anticipate what the other side might say in response - unless it is a completely «new» issue raised in response, a moving party on a leave to appeal motion will not be able to respond to the particular arguments made by the other side.

We work side - by - side with our clients to develop bespoke compliance policies and procedures designed for their particular business, and we conduct internal compliance reviews and programs and assist clients with issues that arise with respect to regulatory reviews of their businesses, including enforcement actions.

Our intention is not to campaign on any particular issue, but rather to present both sides of the argument on issues which are often highly controversial.

As indicated, side tables enable a more detailed discussion of particular land management issues such as fishing, mining, pastoral interests, and local government.

With the House of Representatives so closely divided, it's hard to predict with any certainty whether either side will be able to maintain a working majority on any particular issue.

There is no shortage of opinion made available by the Competition Bureau or the public on this issue when approached by the media, but in this particular MacCleans article and other articles I am seeing, the input from our side is often «CREA declined to make anyone available to be interviewed, citing its ongoing legal battle.»

«It's okay to have a position on a side of an issue, but not on the side of particular people.»

When tribunal members are made to squirm under the microscope of media and public scrutiny when ruling on a contentious issue of legal veracity, and not just on political expediency, they often will choose to err on the side of the strict interpretation of the legislation as it was intended to be interpreted by its framers, and not by another legal analyst with awarded limited power who wants to twist the original intent into a shape that suits his / her political spin (at that particular point in time) to the detriment of his / her chosen target, which target was actually chosen by a third - party legal analyst with a vested interest.