There are also distinctive volcanic eruption
signals in the ocean heat content record.
Not exact matches
Near monotonic increase
in the
heat content of the
oceans is the strongest, clearest expected
signal based on the thermodynamics.
In the following paper, Trenberth and collaborators argue that the «missing» heat is sequestered in the ocean, below 700 m: Ref: «Distinctive climate signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content» (Geophysical research letters — first published 10 May 201
In the following paper, Trenberth and collaborators argue that the «missing»
heat is sequestered
in the ocean, below 700 m: Ref: «Distinctive climate signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content» (Geophysical research letters — first published 10 May 201
in the
ocean, below 700 m: Ref: «Distinctive climate
signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content» (Geophysical research letters — first published 10 May 201
in reanalysis of global
ocean heat content» (Geophysical research letters — first published 10 May 2013)
Balmaseda, M. A., K. E. Trenberth, and E. Källén, 2013: Distinctive climate
signals in reanalysis of global
ocean heat content.
They are mainly derived from the Shaviv reference (provided
in the link above) that concludes that the solar
signal is amplified as indicated by the magnitude of changes
in ocean heat content (and other less direct measures) over the course of the 11 year solar cycle.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50382/full Distinctive climate
signals in reanalysis of global
ocean heat content Here we present the time evolution of the global
ocean heat content for 1958 through 2009 from a new observation - based reanalysis of the
ocean.
Johnson et al. (2007) estimated that the deep
ocean could add an additional 2 - 10 % to the upper
ocean heat content trend, which is likely to grow
in importance as the anthropogenic warming
signal propagates to increasing depth with time.
Balmaseda, M. A., Trenberth, K. E. & Källén, E. Distinctive climate
signals in reanalysis of global
ocean heat content.
As for
ocean heat content, Argo hasn't been
in the water long enough to show a clear
signal, and there have been problems with the data, including a significant correction (you do recall the correction to the UAH satellite record after years of insistence that their data showed the surface temp record trends were completely wrong?).
In the post Trenberth Still Searching for Missing Heat, we discussed the recent Balmaseda et al (2013) paper «Distinctive climate signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content», of which Kevin Trenberth was a coautho
In the post Trenberth Still Searching for Missing
Heat, we discussed the recent Balmaseda et al (2013) paper «Distinctive climate signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content», of which Kevin Trenberth was a coaut
Heat, we discussed the recent Balmaseda et al (2013) paper «Distinctive climate
signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content», of which Kevin Trenberth was a coautho
in reanalysis of global
ocean heat content», of which Kevin Trenberth was a coaut
heat content», of which Kevin Trenberth was a coauthor.
It's called «Distinctive climate
signals in reanalysis of global
ocean heat content», paywalled, of course.