The following
signers of this letter do so as individual NAS members and not on behalf of the NAS itself or their Institutions.
Not exact matches
Hayes insists that this disclosure is necessary «in the interest
of transparency and integrity,» despite the fact that petition platforms like Change.org don't engage in this practice (without
signers» express consent) and that the identities
of prior
signers have no relevance whatsoever to the content
of the
letter.
he didn't have any «pressure» put on him about the development or publishing
of the
letter and is not aware
of any «pressure» having been put on any
of the other
signers by the Conservative chairman.
Although several
signers of the 16 May
letter did not respond to emails requesting comment, one NIH clinical research leader told ScienceInsider that «hundreds»
of staff are upset by the Red Team's report and Collins's response, which they worry will «ruin» the Clinical Center.
Though supportive
of his decision to reopen Dyett High School, the
letter signers expressed concern that the Mayor's plan
does not reflect the full demands
of the local Bronzeville community.
Just because the content
of the
letter contains naive and / or dishonest claims doesn't mean that all the
signers are naive and / or dishonest, only that whomever wrote the document was naive and / or dishonest.
All the
letter's
signers who were not authors were either misled into signing it,
did so out
of personal or institutional loyalty to Johnson Space Center, or are ignorant (naive)
of the science.
First, you write, «Whatever flaws or ambiguities exist in the paper, the use
of the
letters as source materials for any comparison can not purely be a test
of agreement with the IPCC (as we stated above — you could agree with every word in the IPCC report and still not want to
do anything about emissions), but must be a test
of someone's opinion about what to
do about it... Thus the only way in my mind to interpret a comparison
of signers is a categorization by policy direction, not understanding or agreement on the science.