Sentences with phrase «signers use»

As the team analyzed sentence after sentence of ABSL, they saw signers use the same word order again and again: subject - object - verb, or SOV.

With our Knowledge Based Authentication, you can prove the identity of a signer using security questions that target private information unique to the individual signing.

Not exact matches

In October about 200 Christian ethicists issued a statement «about the erroneous use of Christian rhetoric to support the policies of empire,» as it was put by one signer, Glen Stassen, who holds an endowed chair at Fuller Theological Seminary.

They have been known to push and shove to get to the front of crowds, use children for personal gain, foist multiple items on signers, and occasionally become irate when a celebrity points out their schemes.

Since 1961, the Antarctic Treaty, now with 52 signers, has ensured that Antarctica can be used only for peaceful purposes such as scientific research, and not for military or commercial activities such as energy extraction.

In fact, younger signers of ISL use a different gesture to signal an aside — and they have different ways to express many other meanings as well.

Brentari et al. also found that young signers of ASL use certain intonational features with different frequencies than adult ASL signers.

Even the manual alphabet used by deaf signers can differ from one country to another.

In essence, the signers were trying to get the President to change his mind about stem cell lines used for research so that Congress does not have to create a legislative solution.

Both must use the card responsibly because the payment history is reported to each signer's credit reports.

In this case, you must make use of a co - signer.

For example, you could become a signer on your parents» rewards credit card.You can both benefit when you use their rewards credit card because they can earn rewards, and you can build your credit score.

For more than a century, photographers have dealt with the spaces of their studios in strikingly diverse and inventive ways: from using composed theatrical tableaux (in photographs by Julia Margaret Cameron or Cindy Sherman) to putting their subjects against neutral backdrops (Richard Avedon, Robert Mapplethorpe); from the construction of architectural sets within the studio (Francis Bruguière, Thomas Demand) to chemical procedures conducted within the darkroom (Walead Beshty, Christian Marclay); and from precise recordings of motion (Eadweard Muybridge, Harold Edgerton) to playful, amateurish experimentation (Roman Signer, Peter Fischli and David Weiss).

Throughout the 20th century, artists have explored their studio spaces using photography, from the use of composed theatrical tableaux (in photographs by Julia Margaret Cameron or Cindy Sherman) to neutral, blank backdrops (Richard Avedon, Robert Mapplethorpe); from the construction of architectural sets within the studio space (Francis Bruguière, Thomas Demand) to chemical procedures conducted within the darkroom (Walead Beshty, Christian Marclay); and from precise recordings of time and motion (Eadweard Muybridge, Dr. Harold E. Edgerton) to amateurish or playful experimentation (Roman Signer, Peter Fischli / David Weiss).

Alongside the series of A4 - size pages adorned with photographs and typewritten texts used by Kovanda to document his ephemeral actions, the walls of the gallery are covered with black - and - white photocopies of film stills, newspaper images, and artworks by Roman Signer, Marcel Duchamp, Chris Burden, and Vito Acconci, among many others.

These signers are noted on my List of climate authors and signers of climate declarations using the tag CA02.

Perhaps many of the other signers were instead looking right past the people occupying the centre position, and instead were trying to address those on the sceptic side who really do attack science — maybe not even aware when they signed that their stand was being used to support the very anti-science attitudes they wanted so much to criticise.

I.e., there'd have been no short - sighted tactics such as use of NAS - lookalike typography, no claim that the signers constituted «a meaningful representation» (let alone that the consensus was on the skeptics» side), no claim that all the signers were scientists (when some were technologists and dentists, etc.), and no implication that the signers had all been vetted.

Note: The data used in Anderegg et al 2010 in PNAS included signers of all statements shown here except CCC09 and EPA10, which were published after the analysis was done for the paper.

First, you write, «Whatever flaws or ambiguities exist in the paper, the use of the letters as source materials for any comparison can not purely be a test of agreement with the IPCC (as we stated above — you could agree with every word in the IPCC report and still not want to do anything about emissions), but must be a test of someone's opinion about what to do about it... Thus the only way in my mind to interpret a comparison of signers is a categorization by policy direction, not understanding or agreement on the science.

Rather, their approach was much more theoretical than practical.60 In 1779, Thomas Jefferson, then the Governor of Virginia, established «a Professorship of Law and Police» at William and Mary College.61 George Wythe, a signer of the Declaration of Independence and, not coincidentally, the lawyer under whom Jefferson apprenticed, was appointed.62 The purpose of the course of study Wythe taught was less about producing practicing lawyers than it was educating the statesmen of the New Republic.63 Wythe did attempt to blend in some practical training with his lectures and readings through the use of a moot court and a moot legislature, though there is no indication that Wythe required any writing on the part of the students.64

Use multiple layers of authentication to verify the signers, and use the audit trail to ensure document integriUse multiple layers of authentication to verify the signers, and use the audit trail to ensure document integriuse the audit trail to ensure document integrity.

If documents are being used to provide evidence, such as for mortgages or corporate contracts, signers need to be assured that documents can not be altered and that they are legally binding.

And how does the signer know that the computer system he / she is using is actually attaching the signature to the document that he / she intends to sign?

Thus the Convention says that information shall not be denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form; that a legal requirement that information be in writing is satisfied if the information is accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference; that a legal requirement that information be signed is satisfied if an electronic signature is used if that signing method is either appropriately reliable or if the identity of the signer and the connection between the signature and the information are demonstrated.

Our experience with signing on tablets — with delivery systems, at supermarkets, etc — suggest it does not happen much, but that's because of the honesty of the service providers, not because of limits of the technology used (or at least the signer can't tell when signing if the technology is so limited.)

What rules apply to the use and operation of signing devices by signers?

Nothing gives assurance that the purported signer was operating the computer that used the Echosign system.

But you can give your child lots of exposure to the minority language by making sure your child uses Auslan with other signers in the deaf community.

This program allows clients to «sign» a document by using an electronic signature stamp authorized by the signer.

Federal regulators and state attorneys have been investigating banks» procedures for foreclosures after reports surfaced last year of banks using «robo - signers» to sign hundreds of unread foreclosure documents daily without proper reviews.