A ppt that begins to explain sacraments then moves into the meaning and
significance of Baptism for Christians.
What is
the significance of baptism in the life of a Christian, whatever the method?
But to find this, we must look back to Scripture and biblical culture to relearn the meaning and
significance of baptism, so that we can understand the symbolism and function.
However the levity of the video made me cringe a little bit since it might downplay
the significance of baptism along with its rich heritage.
I believe people today are fully capable of being taught from Scripture the beautiful
significance of baptism for believers.
Do you think this helps or hinders
the significance of baptism?
It was thought that
the significance of baptism was not in the symbol of going under the water and then rising back up as though from the dead, but in the power of the water itself after it had been blessed by a priest.
Not exact matches
By and large, the rites
of American civic religion are harmless enough, bland
baptisms of the status quo by the application
of a bit
of liturgy emptied
of any real dogmatic
significance or personal demands.
The first part
of the book is about transforming the practice
of baptism and the Lord's supper to something that more accurately reflects the symbolism and
significance of these events when they were first done by Jesus.
Baptism surely is a clear example
of this
significance of the community.
The symbolic
significance of John's
baptism was plain, the waters
of the Jordan had been the gateway to the promised land — both for the people
of the Exodus journeys and for those who had returned from the Babylonian Exile.
If we understand
baptism as a «full identification» then passages like Romans 6:4 can have meaning and
significance for all people in all cultures at all times; not just for the segment
of the world that practices burial.
Paul elsewhere indicates that the real washing occurs with the water
of the Word (Eph 5:26), and even Peter himself seems to disregard water
baptism as having any real
significance (cf. 1 Pet 3:21).
It is possible,
of course, that water
baptism continued to be practiced as frequently as ever, and the writers simply stopped mentioning it, but when we understand the cultural and religious
significance of water
baptism in the first century Mediterranean world, and specifically the role
of baptism within the book
of Acts, it becomes clear that water
baptism served a special and specific role within the early church which became unnecessary later on.
But Mark, twenty - five years or so later, although he devotes half his space to the passion and events which immediately led up to it, gives also a summary account
of Jesus» earlier career, beginning with his
baptism — a career laden with supernatural
significance.
In an earlier article I noted that in India, any discussion about
baptism and conversion takes on «added
significance because
of the understanding that after
baptism the «converted» person has not only changed his or her religion but also social milieu, habits, customs, and manners, in addition to forfeiting several legal rights, especially with regard to the inheritance
of property.
In this book, the author, a Baptist, concludes the section entitled «The Rise and
Significance of Infant
Baptism,» with the words: «It seems that a small amount
of water is bestowed on a small infant with a very small result.
It was important for them to understand the difference between the various
baptisms, and the
significance of each.
The discourses
of Jesus, for example, upon
Baptism (3) and upon the Eucharist (6) reflect the same fundamental conception
of the
significance and necessity
of these two rites; that this conception was that
of the evangelist is plain, e.g. from 3:16 - 21, where Jesus» words have passed insensibly into the evangelist's reflection upon them; if the evangelist was the son
of Zebedee, it would be natural to accept his accounts as substantially correct records
of incidents and discourses from Jesus» ministry, but, if he was not, a comparison with the synoptic gospels and with the teaching
of Paul and others on the sacraments would suggest doubts as to the historical value
of both discourses.