Sentences with phrase «significant adversity on»

Reducing the effects of significant adversity on young children's healthy development is critical to the progress and prosperity of any society.

Protective experiences and adaptive skills on one side counterbalance significant adversity on the other.

The early childhood field should therefore combine cognitive - linguistic enrichment with greater attention to preventing, reducing, or mitigating the consequences of significant adversity on the developing brain.

Not exact matches

Persistent disparities in educational achievement and lifelong health as a result of significant adversity early in life impose enormous burdens on individuals, communities, and societies.

The power of that one strong adult relationship is a key ingredient in resilience — a positive, adaptive response in the face of significant adversity — according to a new report from the National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, a multidisciplinary...

The Center on the Developing Child (CDC) is committed to catalyzing a new, science - driven era in early childhood policy and practice to dramatically improve the life prospects of all children, particularly those who face significant adversity.

In 2011, Shonkoff launched Frontiers of Innovation, a multi-sectoral collaboration among researchers, practitioners, policymakers, investors, and experts in systems change who are committed to developing more effective intervention strategies to catalyze breakthrough impacts on the development and health of young children and families experiencing significant adversity.

This compelling knowledge base underscores three significant, unmet needs: (1) valid and reliable biological and bio-behavioral measures (or «biomarkers») of «toxic stress» to identify children who are at higher risk of chronic disease in adulthood; (2) more effective intervention strategies to prevent, reduce, or mitigate the long - term health consequences of significant adversity in early childhood; and (3) biomarkers that are sensitive to change and can thus be used to assess the short - term and medium - term effects of intervention strategies whose ultimate impacts on physical and mental health may not be apparent until decades later.

Even children who are fortunate enough not to face significant adversity or trauma, or to be burdened by intense stress or anxiety, experience the pressures around them and the expectations placed on them.

Surprisingly, my clients are very open with me, and that trust they share can be invaluable in understanding how they are able to take on new challenges, overcome significant adversity, tackle nearly - impossible situations, develop innovative ideas that translated to multimillion - dollar profits and make lemons of out of lemonade.

Over the last 20 years significant progress has been made in what we know about the impact of trauma, adversity and toxic stress on early childhood development.

In the overall WMHS analysis, exposure to multiple childhood adversities had a significant effect on the persistence of suicide when considering exposure to every additional childhood adversity; however, in the current study, it was not possible to stratify the number of adversities beyond two or more (ie, into more than two categories), given the relatively small number of cases in the sample overall with non-fatal suicidal behaviour.

It has also been shown that while isolated individual risk factors may not have a significant effect on parent - child attachment, the accumulation of adversity may result in sub-optimal relationship development and insecurity of infant attachment [12].

One final example is the prefrontal cortex, which is thought to play an important role in regulating behavior by suppressing impulses and emotions arising from the amygdala and other parts of the limbic system.50 — 52 In animal studies, exposure to chronic stress or glucocorticoids alters the synaptic connectivity within the prefrontal cortex, 52,53 and this may limit the ability of the prefrontal cortex to (1) suppress the impulsivity and aggression of the limbic system, and (2) execute adaptive responses (rather than maladaptive responses) to stress.54 — 56 Stress - induced changes in brain structure parallel the well - described impact of significant childhood adversity on a variety of brain functions, including the modulation of physiologic responses (hyper - responsive or chronically active stress response), learning (impaired memory), and the regulation of behavior (the ability to execute adaptive vs maladaptive responses to stress).3, 39,57

Implications for home visitation, including very recent data on key characteristics of parents who parent well in the face of significant adversity, will be discussed.

This article, by Center Director Jack P. Shonkoff and Pat Levitt, science director of the National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, advocates for greater synergy between neuroscience and innovation in early childhood policy to improve life outcomes for children experiencing significant adversity.

One - tailed Spearman's correlations between the length of time from the PACE interview to the date of onset and the number of parent - dependent negative life events (calculated on the basis of separate maternal and panel ratings) and chronic adversities were all non-significant (all ps < 0.05), indicating that there was not a significant drop - off in recall.