The vast majority of
significant breaches in the public and private sectors have started with spear phishing, he added.
That is, the three patterns reflect
a significant breach in the «parental unit», typically involving triangulation in which the child is asked to take on the parental role, making decisions or providing the parent with emotional support or involving cross-generational alliances in which parents compete for the child's attention and support (Minuchin).
Not exact matches
«If [R3's] only duty was to provide assistance, and it
breached this duty
in a
significant way (the latter qualification is important since this duty could be
breached in trivial ways), for example by doing nothing when it could have done something, then the
breach looks material to me,» said Stephen Smith, a law professor at McGill University,
in an email to Fortune.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations
in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security
breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including
significant developments that could occur
in the legal and regulatory proceedings described
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
That privacy
breach may have had
significant political effects, since the Trump campaign hired Cambridge Analytica
in June 2016.
Christopher M. Sulyma filed a lawsuit on behalf of two proposed classes of participants
in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claiming that the defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by investing a
significant portion of the plans» assets
in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments through custom - built target - date funds.
The lawsuit claimed the defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by investing a
significant portion of the plans» assets
in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments through custom - built target - date funds.
Plaintiff Christopher M. Sulyma, on behalf of two proposed classes of participants
in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claims that the defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by investing a
significant portion of the plans» assets
in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating
in a highly competitive industry; changes
in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes
in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth
in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility
in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes
in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes
in relationships with
significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions
in the United States and
in various other nations
in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility
in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or
breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events
in the locations
in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock
in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes
in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes
in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth
in its key product categories, increase its market share or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility
in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes
in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes
in relationships with
significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes
in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations of the Company
in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions
in the nations
in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility
in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or
breaches of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events
in the locations
in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the
significant limitations on remedies contained
in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any
breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated
in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage
in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors»
in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.
Equifax, a provider of consumer - credit scores, said on Sept. 7 that personal details of as many as 143 million U.S. consumers were accessed by hackers between mid-May and late July,
in what could be one of the most
significant data
breaches ever
in the United States.
Examples of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to the impact of: adverse general economic and related factors, such as fluctuating or increasing levels of unemployment, underemployment and the volatility of fuel prices, declines
in the securities and real estate markets, and perceptions of these conditions that decrease the level of disposable income of consumers or consumer confidence; adverse events impacting the security of travel, such as terrorist acts, armed conflict and threats thereof, acts of piracy, and other international events; the risks and increased costs associated with operating internationally; our expansion into and investments
in new markets;
breaches in data security or other disturbances to our information technology and other networks; the spread of epidemics and viral outbreaks; adverse incidents involving cruise ships; changes
in fuel prices and / or other cruise operating costs; any impairment of our tradenames or goodwill; our hedging strategies; our inability to obtain adequate insurance coverage; our substantial indebtedness, including the ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and to generate the necessary amount of cash to service our existing debt; restrictions
in the agreements governing our indebtedness that limit our flexibility
in operating our business; the
significant portion of our assets pledged as collateral under our existing debt agreements and the ability of our creditors to accelerate the repayment of our indebtedness; volatility and disruptions
in the global credit and financial markets, which may adversely affect our ability to borrow and could increase our counterparty credit risks, including those under our credit facilities, derivatives, contingent obligations, insurance contracts and new ship progress payment guarantees; fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; overcapacity
in key markets or globally; our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel or the loss of key personnel; future changes relating to how external distribution channels sell and market our cruises; our reliance on third parties to provide hotel management services to certain ships and certain other services; delays
in our shipbuilding program and ship repairs, maintenance and refurbishments; future increases
in the price of, or major changes or reduction
in, commercial airline services; seasonal variations
in passenger fare rates and occupancy levels at different times of the year; our ability to keep pace with developments
in technology; amendments to our collective bargaining agreements for crew members and other employee relation issues; the continued availability of attractive port destinations; pending or threatened litigation, investigations and enforcement actions; changes involving the tax and environmental regulatory regimes
in which we operate; and other factors set forth under «Risk Factors»
in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and subsequent filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In a statement, Mr Osborne said he was glad the committee «acknowledge any
breaches of the rules were not intentional, not major, and did not provide me with any
significant financial benefit».
In the
breach,
significant doubt and strong disagreement had separated the scientists into opposing camps.
If
significant, this
breach of lung defenses, combined with spillage from undigested contents of the mite's gut, can raise an alarm
in the body's immune system which may lead to a «full - blown» allergic reactions.
The EFA report found that trust had forecast a # 284,000 surplus at the end of the 2016 - 17, but the EFA found a new school with a
significant in - year deficit had joined, with the forecast not being revised to reflect this —
breaching academy funding rules.
Also, the company's recently released iPad Mini is predicted to play a
significant role
in breaching the 100 million tablet sales barrier
in a single year, allaying fears that the mini sized iPad would cannibalize sales of its bigger cousin.
This measure ensures that market orders still receive a full and immediate fill, except
in cases where there is unusual liquidity rates or erroneous order parameters which would result
in significant market impacts and a likelihood of
breaching market liquidity thresholds.
Until a
significant downside
breach of this support trendline occurs, this currency pair is still very much
in uptrending mode.
if they have broken any
significant promises made
in loan agreements (called «loan covenant
breaches»)
This cost difference is particularly
significant considering the average data
breach cost for U.S. businesses
in 2017 rose 5 %, to a staggering $ 7 million.
Breaches of the Rules can lead to more
significant penalties, including fines, suspensions and striking off and,
in the most serious cases, an intervention into the Solicitor's practice can be ordered.
Kaylin also has
significant experience handling commercial litigation matters
in both state and federal court, representing corporate clients and individuals
in a wide range of matters, including complex
breach of contract cases, writs of garnishment and replevin, business torts, and fraud and securities litigation.
This point on «reasonable and proper cause» came up recently
in the case of Mostyn v S and P Casuals Ltd, where the EAT held that threatening to impose a
significant pay cut could not amount to «a reasonable and proper cause» and was
in breach of both express and implied terms of the contract.
«Recently, we secured a
significant victory for our clients
in a precedent - setting multidistrict litigation, and we just settled on very favorable terms for our client a complex case involving post-closing
breaches of an asset purchase agreement.
Kate has
significant experience of shareholder disputes arising from share purchase agreements, both
in relation to
breach of warranty claims and enforcement of share purchase agreements when necessary.
While the decision
in Edwards may not mark a departure from the law of minimum obligation it represents a
significant milestone
in an employee's ability to seek redress for a contractual
breach in the county court.
«You have to take a risk - based approach and allocate your resources to the areas that result
in the most number of
breaches and the most
significant breaches.
PIPEDA was amended some time ago to require mandatory notification when there is a
breach that results
in «real risk of
significant harm».
In addition to representing clients in breach - of - contract litigation, Jeff has significant experience counseling clients on contract issues, including on damages, under the common law and Uniform Commercial Cod
In addition to representing clients
in breach - of - contract litigation, Jeff has significant experience counseling clients on contract issues, including on damages, under the common law and Uniform Commercial Cod
in breach - of - contract litigation, Jeff has
significant experience counseling clients on contract issues, including on damages, under the common law and Uniform Commercial Code.
Rather, whether the
breaches of duty of the parties played legally
significant causal roles
in the outcome was
in each case a question of fact to be answered by rational inference drawn
in the usual way from the evidence.
We may, therefore, be seeing a change
in the approach to sentencing
in OH&S cases where jail sentences will be requested by Crown prosecutors and imposed more frequently by courts on individuals convicted of offences involving the
breach of OH&S standards, serious injuries or
significant incidents.
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on 26 February 2016, and it will be interesting to see if UNISON are able to successfully argue that the fees have
breached the principles of equality and effectiveness, particularly
in light of research which suggests that the employment tribunal fees, whilst a
significant reason, may not be the most common reason for the withdrawal of ET or EC claim.
In all cases where the breach is characterised as serious or significant at stage 1, such that the presumption in favour of granting relief does not apply, it is necessary to go on to consider at stage 3 all the circumstances of the case so as to enable the court to deal justly with the application from relie
In all cases where the
breach is characterised as serious or
significant at stage 1, such that the presumption
in favour of granting relief does not apply, it is necessary to go on to consider at stage 3 all the circumstances of the case so as to enable the court to deal justly with the application from relie
in favour of granting relief does not apply, it is necessary to go on to consider at stage 3 all the circumstances of the case so as to enable the court to deal justly with the application from relief.
This transformation of the risk assessment and recognition of the parties potentially harmed from threats to information systems are very
significant developments, and,
in several countries, are largely a result of data
breaches and the consequences that follow under data
breach notification laws (i.e. fines, the costs of providing notice to affected individuals, and reputational harm).
By way of a refresher, following the implementation of the new data
breach sections of PIPEDA, organizations that experience a data
breach (referred to
in PIPEDA as a «
breach of security safeguards») must determine whether the
breach poses a «real risk of
significant harm» (which may include bodily harm, humiliation, damage to reputation or relationships, loss of employment, business or professional opportunities, financial loss, identity theft, negative effects on the credit record and damage to or loss of property) to any individual whose information was involved
in the
breach by conducting a risk assessment.
(d) an estimate of the number of individuals
in respect of whom the
breach creates a real risk of
significant harm;
In all but the most blatant of cases (eg price fixing) Art 81 is only breached if the anti-competitive effects are appreciable, in other words they impact on a significant part of the overall marke
In all but the most blatant of cases (eg price fixing) Art 81 is only
breached if the anti-competitive effects are appreciable,
in other words they impact on a significant part of the overall marke
in other words they impact on a
significant part of the overall market.
If the
breach in respect of which relief from sanctions is sought is serious or
significant the second stage is to consider why the failure or the default occurred.
The
breach in Utilise (the late filing of a costs budget by 45 minutes),
in contrast to the situation
in the other two appeals, was categorised by the Court of Appeal as neither serious nor
significant.
Then, she decided that the students were not
in a position to give informed consent to the
breach of their Charter right, given that they had no meaningful choice between consenting to the test and missing a
significant event
in their lives.
this explosion
in the volume of
breach of privacy complaints however constitutes the single most
significant change
in our caseload since the appointment of a full - time Information and Privacy Commissioner
in 2003.
It may be that if the risk is
significant in terms of both likelihood and gravity of harm that a defendant who fails to remove it will be
in breach of duty.
Thus, with no new releases and with
breach of the previous contracts, the market went through a serious crisis of liquidity
in 2017, with strong reduction of cash flow and a
significant increase of its inventories.
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the power of lower courts to order Charter damages, but allowed the City's appeal
in part, stating that Charter damages should only be used
in certain narrow circumstances where the Charter
breach is
significant, and where other remedies would fail to compensate the Plaintiff.
Furthermore, notice will be required where the privacy
breach is
significant, taking into consideration the sensitivity and volume of the PHI at issue; the number of individuals whose information was involved
in the
breach; and whether more than one custodian or agent were responsible for the
breach.
Prior to that he led and drove
significant growth
in their settlement administration, mass tort and
breach response divisions as well as various bankruptcy creditor divisions, including Chapter 7 and loan servicing.
In Colombia, a series of
significant claims against the State for an alleged
breach of its obligations under free trade agreements or investment protection agreements has shown that arbitration is one of the most important tools at the disposal of independent investors to protect them against the possible
breach of these agreements.
In breach of duty, the defendants failed to advise the claimants that the valuation of the shell companies upon flotation was critical, wrongly advised them that the maximum loss to be suffered in the film scheme was the initial investment, and failed to advise them that there was a significant risk that the schemes would successfully be challenged by HMR
In breach of duty, the defendants failed to advise the claimants that the valuation of the shell companies upon flotation was critical, wrongly advised them that the maximum loss to be suffered
in the film scheme was the initial investment, and failed to advise them that there was a significant risk that the schemes would successfully be challenged by HMR
in the film scheme was the initial investment, and failed to advise them that there was a
significant risk that the schemes would successfully be challenged by HMRC.