The result of this is a threefold whammy: 1) unlicensed activities continue at the same rate (or increase as the human population increases); 2) a
significant number of pet owners who want to be law - abiding citizens give up
banned breeds, quit feeding neighborhood cats or terminate valuable
breeding programs rather than operate illegally or cope with unreasonable laws and increased fees; and 3) because demand for many beloved
breeds does not decline when a law is passed, people who know little about
breeds or
breeding move into the void to fill demand.
In a letter distributed to family housing residents, Flatau said the
breed choices chosen for the
ban were based on «a
significant body of empirical evidence indicating they are apt to violent behavior, often unpredictable and have the capability to inflict severe harm or death.»