All evidence suggests that significant climate changes like the LIA, and the Medieval Warm Period that preceded it, are the result of
significant changes in solar activity.
Not exact matches
And we know that
changes in solar activity have made
significant changes in climate.
Flood layer frequency
in the Ammersee sediment record depicts distinct multi-decadal variations and
significant correlations to a total
solar irradiance reconstruction (r = − 0.4, p < 0.0001) and 14C production rates (r = 0.37, p < 0.0001), reflecting
changes in solar activity.
Thanks for publishing this, there are folks who denigrated the work of scientists that claimed a
solar - climate (temperature) link because the variability
in solar energy output just wasn't enough to explain the temperature swings, and perhaps they now realize that there could be another mechanism - similar to a transistor where small
changes in gate voltage can affect large
changes in power transmission - whereby
solar activity can create
significant effects on temperature.
Thus it appears that, provided further satellite cloud data confirms the cosmic ray flux low cloud seeding hypothesis, and no other factors were involved over the past 150 years (e.g., variability of other cloud layers) then there is a potential for
solar activity induced
changes in cloudiness and irradiance to account for a
significant part of the global warming experienced during the 20th century, with the possible exception of the last two decades.
In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balanc
In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human
activities being the primary cause of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to
significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences of natural
changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balanc
in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of
changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balanc
in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balance.
One last point is
solar activity in order to accomplish a
significant climate
change has to do two things.
Oleg Sorokhtin of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Ocean Studies, and many other Russian scientists maintain that global climate depends predominantly on natural factors, such as
solar activity, precession (wobbling) of the Earth's axis,
changes in ocean currents, fluctuations
in saltiness of ocean surface water, and some other factors, whereas industrial emissions do not play any
significant role.
GCMs fail because the IPCC and the model - makers refuse to admit that
changes in solar activity have a
significant effect on climate
change.
A statistically
significant signature of multi-decadal
solar activity changes in atmospheric temperatures at three European stations, Vladimir Kossobokov, Jean - Louis Le Mouel and Vincent Courtillot, 05/2010, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar - Terrestrial Physics, Volume 72, Issues 7 - 8, pp. 595
solar activity changes in atmospheric temperatures at three European stations, Vladimir Kossobokov, Jean - Louis Le Mouel and Vincent Courtillot, 05/2010, Journal of Atmospheric and
Solar - Terrestrial Physics, Volume 72, Issues 7 - 8, pp. 595
Solar - Terrestrial Physics, Volume 72, Issues 7 - 8, pp. 595 - 606
We know that there are
significant changes of much longer term
in the overall level of
solar activity.