The ever - changing environment of business has led to
significant changes in the index world.
Not exact matches
These widely used measures of house prices are all less than fully satisfactory
in that the quarterly movements are influenced by compositional
changes and contain
significant lags
in recording transactions; the lags arise because most standard
indices record prices as at the date a transaction is settled, which is well after the price was determined by agreement on a contract.
Burke recommends that the analysis of any written work should begin with the «principle of the concordance».21 The critic builds an
index of
significant terms: terms that recur
in changing contexts, terms that occur at
significant points
in the narrative, terms that seem heavy with symbolic meaning.
The authors found that breastfeeding promotion interventions were not associated with
significant changes in weight or length, but led to a modest, albeit
significant, reduction
in body mass
index / weight - for - height z scores.
In spite of having significant fixed income within the index, excess return over change in cost of income was substantially positive (unlike the comparison using the S&P U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
In spite of having
significant fixed income within the
index, excess return over change in cost of income was substantially positive (unlike the comparison using the S&P U.S. Aggregate Bond In
index, excess return over
change in cost of income was substantially positive (unlike the comparison using the S&P U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
in cost of income was substantially positive (unlike the comparison using the S&P U.S. Aggregate Bond
IndexIndex).
I suppose it's true that some sort of
change is
in order, since you have failed to convince the financial blog community, but as is often the case with you, I'm not at all convinced that you are applying sound reasoning
in assuming that the frothy mix of politics is the right place to take your war on passive
index investing; which is about the most benign thing a person could do, and one that I am not sure can be outlawed without
significant impact on our basic personal freedoms!
Decades of research have demonstrated that the cost of
changes in the S&P 500
Index is significant and increasing.1 Consistent with earlier academic findings, Chen, Noronha, and Singal (2004) determined that, from announcement day to the effective date, the additional cost of a new index holding rose from 3 % in the 1976 — 1989 period to about 9 % in the 1989 — 2000 pe
Index is
significant and increasing.1 Consistent with earlier academic findings, Chen, Noronha, and Singal (2004) determined that, from announcement day to the effective date, the additional cost of a new
index holding rose from 3 % in the 1976 — 1989 period to about 9 % in the 1989 — 2000 pe
index holding rose from 3 %
in the 1976 — 1989 period to about 9 %
in the 1989 — 2000 period.
Some of the more
significant indicators include: The Gross Domestic Product (represents the total market value of all goods and services produced), Retail Sales (measures the total receipts of all retail stores), Industrial Production (shows the
change in production of factories, mines and utilities), and Consumer's Price
Index (measure of the
change in prices of consumer goods).
There is no
significant change in DI (distraction
index is the most accurate diagnostic technique) attributable to a bitch being
in heat, or to the other reasons, when this method is used.
(Photons also tend to conserve their wavelength, except as
changes are required to conserve frequency while propagating through variations
in the
index of refraction n. Often we speak of photons as if their wavelengths are unchanging — this is approximately true for radiation flowing though the atmosphere because n is very very close to 1, but
in case the issue becomes
significant, often when I've refered to the wavelength of radiation, I've been refering to the wavelength that a photon would have
in a vacuum.)
When I point out that there is no
significant change in any of the NINO
indices, the response is «well it hasn't happened yet».
How can there even be such «trends» (i.e. a statistically
significant long - term
change in the overall
index over say, 25 - year period)?
The effect is minimal for average
indices but is statistically
significant in a subset of models for projected
changes of 10 and 20 - year return periods.
In that workshop, reporting on trend analysis in ACE in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Saunders concluded that «No significant change in ACE index or ACE index variance is observed anywhere, either over the full period or, for the U.S., using the recent 1978 - 2003 period compared to prior 26 - year period
In that workshop, reporting on trend analysis
in ACE in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Saunders concluded that «No significant change in ACE index or ACE index variance is observed anywhere, either over the full period or, for the U.S., using the recent 1978 - 2003 period compared to prior 26 - year period
in ACE
in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Saunders concluded that «No significant change in ACE index or ACE index variance is observed anywhere, either over the full period or, for the U.S., using the recent 1978 - 2003 period compared to prior 26 - year period
in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Saunders concluded that «No
significant change in ACE index or ACE index variance is observed anywhere, either over the full period or, for the U.S., using the recent 1978 - 2003 period compared to prior 26 - year period
in ACE
index or ACE
index variance is observed anywhere, either over the full period or, for the U.S., using the recent 1978 - 2003 period compared to prior 26 - year periods.
In other words, the most significant change came with the use of force whether directly or indirectly: weapons, famine, starvation, killings, genocide, and, the transfer of ownership of property (gold, land, slaves, tobacco, sugar, coffee, etc.) with contractual consideration given in the form of a Bible, various baubles, and an annual per capita grant not indexed to CP
In other words, the most
significant change came with the use of force whether directly or indirectly: weapons, famine, starvation, killings, genocide, and, the transfer of ownership of property (gold, land, slaves, tobacco, sugar, coffee, etc.) with contractual consideration given
in the form of a Bible, various baubles, and an annual per capita grant not indexed to CP
in the form of a Bible, various baubles, and an annual per capita grant not
indexed to CPI.