Paul Key QC and Siddharth Dhar acted for the Republic of Kazakhstan in major 7 - day Commercial Court trial involving detailed allegations of Kazakh and Lebanese law relating to very
significant claims brought against the State by Ruby Roz, a Kazakh poultry farm company.
Not exact matches
The risk of
significant legal costs is quite substantial if a
claim is
brought against you, and having your policy cover the defense can be the difference between an easy fix and bankruptcy!
As we have previously considered (see previous article cited above) the courts will give
significant weight to Art 10 arguments in
claims brought against the media.
[1] The plaintiff, David Ellis, has
brought an action
against the defendant, Orlex Saul Fallios - Guthierrez, for battery,
claiming that he suffered
significant physical and emotional injuries.
He has acted in some of the most
significant recent actions in these areas, including the proceedings
brought by Hewlett - Packard
against Michael Lynch concerning the acquisition of Autonomy plc, the unlawful dividend
claim brought by BAT
against Sequana S.A., and the dispute in respect of the affairs of Coroin Ltd, the owner of Claridge's.
Among the firm's most
significant results were wins on behalf of Kleiner Perkins in a gender discrimination case
brought by former partner Ellen Pao, DISH Network in its copyright fight with the four major U.S. broadcast networks, MobileIron in a patent infringement suit
against rival Good Technology, and Broadcom in a Dodd - Frank retaliation
claim brought by a former employee.
Successfully defending a
claim brought by a utilities company
against the owners of an industrial plant in relation to
significant charges which were invoiced in breach of contract.
The risk of
significant legal costs is quite substantial if a
claim is
brought against you, and having your policy cover the defense can be the difference between an easy fix and bankruptcy!