Verdict; we have improved allot offensively and we have kept a good
defense with arguably more pace so we should be able to react better to opposing counter ATt whilst posing a
significant threat the other direction
1 For attempts to measure the effect of advocacy quality through other means, see, e.g., Banks Miller et al., Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability, 49 Law & Soc» y Rev. 209 (2015)(finding that high quality representation evened the odds for asylum applicants and that asylum seekers fared better when unrepresented than when represented by a poor lawyer); Mitchell J. Frank & Dr. Osvaldo F. Morera, Professionalism and Advocacy at Trial — Real Jurors Speak in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(finding statistically
significant correlations in criminal cases between jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury
verdict, and finding statistically
significant correlations in civil cases between perceptions of
defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and
defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make?
But we are also a firm with the genuine ability to take antitrust cases to trial, and we have done so with frequent success, including a
defense jury
verdict for our client Micron in a multi-billion dollar case that was perhaps the most
significant U.S. antitrust jury trial of the past decade.