Sentences with phrase «significant difference in the outcome»

Midwives usually only address this on a superficial level when discussing settings («there is no significant difference in outcomes» etc etc) and that is good enough for most women.

There were no significant differences in outcome of home or hospital births attended by midwives for the other child health measures.

There was no significant difference in these outcomes between the flexible sigmoidoscopy only vs the flexible sigmoidoscopy and FOBT screening groups.

Similarly, meta - analyses of studies of adults and older children have demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between trial participants and nonparticipants who were treated similarly outside trials,» the authors write.

They should, however, make a significant difference in the outcome of research.

The significant difference in outcome achieved by transplantation of hGDAsBMP versus hGDAsCNTF demonstrates clearly that not all astrocytes are equivalent in respect to their therapeutic value, and this appears to be the first study demonstrating functional differences between different human astrocyte populations with respect to repairing the adult central nervous system.

After analyzing student outcome data and comparing current student performance with annual yearly progress benchmarks for student achievement, the leadership team agrees that there are significant differences in outcomes among students of diverse racial, ethnic, cultural and linguistic backgrounds unrelated to socioeconomic status???.

Conclusion — No significant difference in outcome as determined by ground reaction forces (the gold standard in determining this — foot pressure on a plate) or radiographic OA scores were found between dogs with CrCL injury treated with LFS (extra-cap) or TPLO.

The size of the vehicles involved and the speed at which they travel makes a significant difference in the outcome of the accident.

The knowledge and experience of your lawyer can make a significant difference in the outcome of your bike injury claim.

The attorney you choose can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case, so it is important that you choose one who is knowledgeable about your particular case.

After controlling for demographic characteristics there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes at baseline and also no evidence of differential attrition.

The validity of the counterfactual was established by testing for statistically significant differences in outcome variables between CfC and comparison sites at wave 1 and by testing for differential rates of sample attrition between waves 1 and 3.

Significant differences in the outcome variables were found for the in - person treatment group and for the on - line only versions of the program, versus a wait - listed control group.

Not exact matches

Just published in the journal the most careful, rigorous, and methodologically sound study ever conducted on this issue found numerous and significant differences between these groups — with the outcomes for children of h0m0 rated «suboptimal in almost every category

Overall, there were no significant differences in the odds of the primary outcome for births planned in any of the non-obstetric unit settings compared with planned births in obstetric units (table 3 ⇑).

RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in baseline characteristics, obstetrical and perinatal outcomes; however, there was a preference among women in both groups for the upright position.

For multiparous women, there were no significant differences in the primary outcome between birth settings.

There was no difference overall between birth settings in the incidence of the primary outcome (composite of perinatal mortality and intrapartum related neonatal morbidities), but there was a significant excess of the primary outcome in births planned at home compared with those planned in obstetric units in the restricted group of women without complicating conditions at the start of care in labour.

Overall, there were no significant differences in the adjusted odds of the primary outcome for any of the non-obstetric unit settings compared with obstetric units.

Most studies of homebirth in other countries have found no statistically significant differences in perinatal outcomes between home and hospital births for women at low risk of complications.36, 37,39 However, a recent study in the United States showed poorer neonatal outcomes for births occurring at home or in birth centres.40 A meta - analysis in the same year demonstrated higher perinatal mortality associated with homebirth41 but has been strongly criticised on methodological grounds.5, 42 The Birthplace in England study, 43 the largest prospective cohort study on place of birth for women at low risk of complications, analysed a composite outcome, which included stillbirth and early neonatal death among other serious morbidity.

The analysis by parity indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in adverse neonatal outcomes for nulliparous women although the numbers are much smaller than the Birthplace in England study.

In the only controlled, randomized scientific study to compare graduated extinction and «positive routines» head - to - head, there were no significant differences in treatment outcomes for kids (Adams and Rickert 1989In the only controlled, randomized scientific study to compare graduated extinction and «positive routines» head - to - head, there were no significant differences in treatment outcomes for kids (Adams and Rickert 1989in treatment outcomes for kids (Adams and Rickert 1989).

«We found small but meaningful differences in developmental outcomes between late preterm infants and full term groups, which if applied to larger populations, may have potentially significant long term public health implications,» says lead author Prachi Shah, M.D., a developmental and behavioral pediatrician at U-M's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital.

Information includes type of comparison; child behaviour outcome measures demonstrating a significant difference between comparison groups; numbers of children in each comparison group.

For the vote - counting exercise a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) difference in favour of the intervention was considered a positive outcome, a statistically significant difference in favour of control was considered a negative outcome and no statistically significant difference was considered a neutral outcome.

Significant differences in perinatal outcomes exist between subgroups of the Asian American and Pacific Islander community.

Significant differences in perinatal outcomes exist between Asian, white, and interracial Asian - white couples.

Researchers supporting co-parenting identified a number of fundamental methodological flaws of recent studies that challenge co-parenting of infants and young children: the failure to interview both parents, small and non-representative samples and use of unreliable and invalid measures, and the fact that even these studies have actually found no significant differences in child outcomes in single versus co-parenting families.

The most recent U.K. data for planned place of birth shows no significant differences in negative outcomes between births at home, at birth centers, and obstetric units for mothers who have already had children.

In my native country, for many elections I have seen significant (usually missed the winner) differences between pre-election polls and actual outcome.

Also, since most of the concern about non-citizen voters is ultimately driven by the concern of conservatives that non-citizen voters will flip elections for Democrats, it is worth noting that most counties with lots of non-citizen adults are also overwhelmingly Democratic by margins that far exceed the highest imaginable percentage of non-citizen voters in any reality based analysis, and another significant percentage of those counties are very safe Republican leaning counties, where again, non-citizen voters wouldn't make a difference in outcomes.

A report by the NFER also found «no significant difference in attainment progress between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4 outcomes after two years between converter academies and similar non-academy schools.»

«We did not see statistically significant differences between hatha yoga and a control group (health education) at 10 weeks, however, when we examined outcomes over a period of time including the three and six months after yoga classes ended, we found yoga was superior to health education in alleviating depression symptoms.»

«In all three of these measures of treatment outcome we found significant differences between before - and after the switch to biological treatment, both at 3 - 5 months after the switch and also sustained over the entire observed timespan,» says Marcus Schmitt - Egenolf.

The team found significant differences in cancer outcomes among the Asian subgroups.

The researchers found no statistically significant difference between rates of asthma (including childhood - onset asthma), atopic dermatitis, or IgE levels in people with or without any of the four genetic changes associated with lower levels of 25 - hydroxyvitamin D. However, the results do not exclude an association between the outcomes and levels of 1,25 - dihydroxyvitamin D, the active form of the vitamin, and more work will be needed to determine if the results hold true in non-European populations and in people with vitamin D deficiency.

Although the differences in BMI scores seem insignificant, there is evidence that even a small change in BMI score is clinically important and associated with significant change in health outcomes.

«Exploratory analyses of several secondary outcomes indicated that the sedation protocol was associated with a difference in patients» sedation experience; patients in the intervention group were able to be safely managed in a more awake and calm state while intubated, receiving fewer days of opioid exposure and fewer sedative classes without an increase in inadequate pain or sedation management or clinically significant iatrogenic [consequence of treatment] withdrawal compared with patients receiving usual care, but they experienced more days with reported pain and agitation, suggesting a complex relationship among wakefulness, pain, and agitation,» the authors write.

While zonisamide also decreased both UPDRS Part II (off - time) and UPDRS total scores compared to placebo (UPDRS Part II [off - time] scores: WMD, — 0.79; UPDRS total scores: WMD, — 2.51), there were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes between the two groups.

Additionally, within each of the 7 specific categories of clinical research (October 2002 council only), there were no significant differences in review outcomes for applications reviewed by study sections reviewing 1 % to 25 % clinical applications compared with outcomes in study sections reviewing larger percentages of clinical applications.

After watching outcomes for two weeks, four weeks and then three months, the British team found no significant differences between the three groups in terms of easing of eczema symptoms.

The difference in outcomes between the two groups was not considered significant, and the team concluded that the olive leaf extract «was similarly effective» as the drug option (Captopril).

So with enough sweet potatoes and exercise, maybe a little extra fat isn't the end of the world (or maybe there are in fact significant differences in long term health outcomes that aren't being addressed), but unfortunately these nuances often get lost in translation and the average reader thinks oh goody, coconut oil ad libitum, and will surpass what the islanders were eating in total fat consumption, without incorporating all of the other health promoting diet and lifestyle factors: activity, sweet potatoes and other low fat high fiber foods, community, stress reduction, etc..

There was no significant difference in attainment progress between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4 outcomes after two years between converter academies and similar non-academy schools in 2013, although ceiling effects could limit the extent to which differences between these higher performing schools can be observed.

While LSP transfers result in slightly more negative outcomes than positive ones for receiving schools, this difference is not statistically significant.

Evidence points to the improvement - focused messaging having a stronger impact on both credit attainment and student attendance, though the size of the study limits our ability to call the difference in outcomes between positive and improvement messaging statistically significant.

Yet «these gains became ambiguous as time went on» and «did not lead to many improved outcomes in adulthood... with, for example, no statistically significant differences in high school graduation rates, employment, or criminal activity.»

Under the leadership of a visionary Executive Headteacher with a proven track record in school improvement and a Senior Leadership Team committed to making a difference and achieving the best possible outcomes for our pupils, the academies are already showing significant improvement.

Perhaps just as important, given the difficulty of finding, training and retaining outstanding teachers, is that the difference in long - term outcome between students who have average teachers and those with poor - performing ones is as significant as the difference between those who have excellent teachers and those with average ones, the study found.