Sentences with phrase «significant differences between group»

As I tried to make clear there are significant differences between group and individual work.

Just published in the journal the most careful, rigorous, and methodologically sound study ever conducted on this issue found numerous and significant differences between these groups — with the outcomes for children of h0m0 rated «suboptimal in almost every category

No significant difference between the groups existed for these practices.

For general clinical state there was also no significant difference between groups (5 RCTs, n = 2705, RR intermediate or bad outcome 0.98 CI 0.86 to 1.11).

But when it came to colicky babies — babies who cried excessively and inconsolably — there was no significant difference between groups (St James - Roberts et al 2006).

No significant differences between groups were observed at six to seven months in the risk of underweight (RR 0.92, 95 % CI [0.54 to 1.58], stunting (RR 1.20, 95 % CI [0.57 to 2.53]-RRB-, or wasting (RR 0.42, 95 % CI [0.12 to 1.50]; 1 study / 370 infants) or at nine to ten months (underweight RR 0.93, 95 % CI [0.64 to 1.36]; stunting RR 1.21, 95 % CI [0.62 to 2.37]; wasting RR 0.82, 95 % CI [0.39 to 1.71]; 1 study / 319 infants).

Bivariate analyses showed a significant difference between the groups regarding breastfeeding initiation rate (79 vs. 66 vs. 63 %, respectively; P < 0.05) for the intervention, attention control, and usual care groups.

There were no significant differences between groups (helmeted vs. unhelmeted riders) with respect to other types of cervical spine injuries that were sustained: nerve root injury, cervical strain, or cord contusion.

«We found a significant difference between the groups in their ability to learn a list of 10 semantically related words,» noted Dr. Chiaravalloti.

Results from the analysis of data from 113 children with non-severely infected eczema, published in the Annals of Family Medicine journal, showed no significant difference between the groups in the resolution of eczema symptoms at two weeks, four weeks or three months.

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in deaths or hospitalizations from any cause.

«Although we expected the rates of cognitive change to differ significantly between those with a history of TBI compared to those with no history of TBI, we found no significant difference between the groups, regardless of their APOE genotype,» explained corresponding author Robert Stern, PhD, Director of the Clinical Core of the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Center (BU ADC) and professor of neurology, neurosurgery and anatomy and neurobiology at Boston University School of Medicine.

Unpaired Student's t test or one - way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test was performed, as appropriate, to determine significant differences between groups.

«Significant differences between groups were found for the separation anxiety component («My child is afraid to be alone in the house») and social anxiety component («My child is shy») favoring pet ownership,» the researchers wrote.

As a result of doing the same effective training program, there were no significant differences between the groups in total training volume or any of the other categories.

Improvements in squat and deadlift performance, respectively, were also observed in both control and T + groups, but with no statistically significant differences between groups.

There was no significant difference between the group that did and didn't do additional «homework» yoga.

This brings to light the fact that there isn't any additional benefit to be had consuming 600 mg 6OXO daily compared to 300 mg, and as concluded by the researchers: «for free testosterone, DHT there were no significant differences between groups, suggesting 300 mg and 600 mg of 6 - OXO to be equally as effective in increasing androgen levels.

In fact, they found no significant differences between groups.

demonstrated a statistically significant difference between groups on length of time asleep, F (2, 28) = 5.16, p <.01.

On all outcome measures, the intervention group means were higher than the control group means, although statistical tests did not yield significant differences between the groups.

There was no significant difference between a group receiving intensive outreach and a comparison group on whether they had rehomed a companion animal in the last year.

As any researcher knows, with such a large sample you are guaranteed to find statistically significant differences between groups.

Although there were no significant differences between groups, positive effect sizes (range:.25 — .40) were found for the COPE program with respect to maternal state anxiety at 3 of the 4 postdischarge time points.

We attempted an analysis of results by programme fidelity and also by area, and no statistically significant differences between the groups were found.

The only significant difference between the groups was improved educational functioning associated with high - intensity intervention.

ANOVA confirmed significant differences between the groups (F (2,1741) = 3.7, p = 0.026).

There was no significant difference between groups for family improvement scores.

An improvement in all clinical variables was observed, with no statistically significant differences between the groups, with the exception of probing depth.

A one - way ANOVA revealed no significant differences between groups on instrumental care, F (3,76) = 1.84, p =.15, although the low sample size in the Fearful group limited the power to detect differences.

When the small changes in the control group were taken into account there was no significant differences between groups.

Thus there was no evidence of systematic and significant differences between the groups in terms of medication.

Three months after the initial assessment there were no statistically significant differences between the groups on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores: 15.6 versus 16.0, mean difference − 0.37, 95 % CI (− 3.28 to 2.53) or Children's Global Assessment Scale scores: 64.6 versus 60.1, mean difference 4.49, 95 % CI (− 0.98 to 9.96).

Borderline symptom list (BSL - 23) There was no significant difference between groups on either ITT or completer analyses.

A small number of RCTs investigating stress management, group CBT or other psychological therapies compared with waiting list / usual care did not consistently find significant differences between the groups.

There were no significant differences between groups.

However, there were no significant differences between the groups on self - reports of delinquency as measured by the Elliott Delinquency Scale.

However, there was no significant difference between the groups on the competence scale.

Comparisons of the 2 groups with this series of measures showed no significant differences between the groups.

Comparisons of the 2 groups on this series of measures showed no significant differences between the groups.

The results showed no significant difference between groups: maternal sensitivity (warm to cold)(MD -0.34; 95 % CI -1.07 to 0.40; Analysis 2.16.1)(I2 = 91 %); intrusive to non-intrusive (MD -0.10; 95 % CI -0.85 to 0.66; Analysis 2.17.1; I2 = 90 %); maternal remoteness (MD 0.08; 95 % CI -0.32 to 0.48; Analysis 2.18.1); infant interactions - infant attentive to inattentive (Analysis 2.19); infant lively to inert (Analysis 2.20); or infant happy to distressed sub - scales (Analysis 2.21).

However, there were no significant differences between the groups in measures of fear of being injured and fear of bad things happening.

There were no significant differences between groups in gender, race, age, or family structure.

The most significant difference between the groups was on the aggressive subscale, with the control group scores increasing from baseline to postprogram and the PLL group decreasing during the same time period.

There were no significant differences between groups in hostile attributions and behavioral intentions during both years.

Although White - Traut 2009 reported that cortisol levels measured at 10 minutes after the intervention had declined, meta - analysis of 54 participants from White - Traut 2009 and Field 1996 showed no significant difference between groups (SMD -0.24; 95 % CI -0.77 to 0.30; Analysis 1.11).

Families who chose to participate in the program were compared to nonparticipating families; there were significant differences between the groups at baseline.

Although significant reductions in anxiety symptoms were reported by the end of the MBCT - C program, no significant differences between groups were found as well as the relationship between mindfulness and reading comprehension was not supported in this study.

Limitations included significant differences between groups.

As shown in Table 5, multilevel analyses found that, as rated by teachers, beneficial outcomes were generally maintained (as indicated by the lack of statistically significant differences between groups) or continued to improve following ROE completion, with one exception: Some of the ROE1 gain in prosocial behaviour was not maintained.