The trial was designed with this anticipated attrition rate, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed that there were
no significant differences in the risk profiles between patients who underwent the assigned surgical treatment and those who withdrew, Adams said.
The Physicians» Health Study II (PHS II) remains the only randomized, large - scale, long - term trial to test whether a daily multivitamin reduced cardiovascular disease risk, and researchers found that after 11 years of follow up, there was
no significant difference in risk of major cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among men who took a multivitamin compared to those that took a placebo.
There is
no significant difference in risk between these two groups.
One at Harvard University included an eight - to fourteen - year follow - up study of approximately thirty - eight thousand men and eighty thousand women.12 There was no statistically
significant difference in risk for heart attacks and strokes among people who ate eggs less than once a week compared with those who ate more than one egg a day.
Although the combined treatment of oral progestogens with percutaneous progesterone significantly decreased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.5; 95 % confidence interval 0.2 - 0.9) as compared with nonusers, there was
no significant difference in the risk of breast cancer in percutaneous progesterone users versus nonusers among oral progestogen users.
Not exact matches
Investors may be exposed to substantial
risks and
significant financial losses
in trading cryptocurrency futures contracts and other cryptocurrency - related investment products (eg options, swaps and contracts for
differences), especially on unregulated exchanges.
It's more accurate to say that each week we have a small, statistically insignificant and wholly unreliable forecast for the coming week's market direction, but that when grouped over a large number of instances, the
differences in the average return /
risk profile of different Market Climates are highly statistically
significant.
However, other studies have found no
difference in risk associated with moderate versus high levels of protein intake, and even when
differences have been found, they have not turned out to be statistically
significant.
Over a three - month period there was no statistically
significant difference in injury
risk between the pre-run stretching and non-stretching groups.
An important conclusion of this study was that fathers make
significant differences for the better
in the lives of their at -
risk children.
Most studies of homebirth
in other countries have found no statistically
significant differences in perinatal outcomes between home and hospital births for women at low
risk of complications.36, 37,39 However, a recent study
in the United States showed poorer neonatal outcomes for births occurring at home or
in birth centres.40 A meta - analysis
in the same year demonstrated higher perinatal mortality associated with homebirth41 but has been strongly criticised on methodological grounds.5, 42 The Birthplace
in England study, 43 the largest prospective cohort study on place of birth for women at low
risk of complications, analysed a composite outcome, which included stillbirth and early neonatal death among other serious morbidity.
Planned out - of - hospital birth was associated with increased odds of perinatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 2.43; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted
risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1000 births; 95 % CI, 0.51 to 2.54 per 1000) and neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 2.87; 95 % CI, 1.10 to 7.47; adjusted
risk difference, 0.63 deaths per \ 1000 births; 95 % CI, 0.03 to 1.24 per 1000), but there was no
significant increase
in the odds of infant death.
No
significant differences between groups were observed at six to seven months
in the
risk of underweight (RR 0.92, 95 % CI [0.54 to 1.58], stunting (RR 1.20, 95 % CI [0.57 to 2.53]-RRB-, or wasting (RR 0.42, 95 % CI [0.12 to 1.50]; 1 study / 370 infants) or at nine to ten months (underweight RR 0.93, 95 % CI [0.64 to 1.36]; stunting RR 1.21, 95 % CI [0.62 to 2.37]; wasting RR 0.82, 95 % CI [0.39 to 1.71]; 1 study / 319 infants).
Research from Australia has found no
significant difference between planned home birth and hospital birth
in terms of the
risk of PPH [1].
In some high - income countries, where maternity care is integrated across birth settings, researchers have concluded that there are no significant differences between birth places in morbidity or mortality for newborns [15, 16, 19] and / or that the absolute risks of mortality are extremely low [13, 14
In some high - income countries, where maternity care is integrated across birth settings, researchers have concluded that there are no
significant differences between birth places
in morbidity or mortality for newborns [15, 16, 19] and / or that the absolute risks of mortality are extremely low [13, 14
in morbidity or mortality for newborns [15, 16, 19] and / or that the absolute
risks of mortality are extremely low [13, 14].
Published early online
in CANCER, a peer - reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, the study also revealed
significant racial
differences in the
risk of dying from cervical cancer.
In the largest study to date, Dr. Davidson's study compared rates of apnea after general or regional anesthesia among 722 infants and found that while there was little evidence for a difference in late apnea, there was evidence that regional anesthesia reduced the risk of significant apnea in the first 30 minutes after surger
In the largest study to date, Dr. Davidson's study compared rates of apnea after general or regional anesthesia among 722 infants and found that while there was little evidence for a
difference in late apnea, there was evidence that regional anesthesia reduced the risk of significant apnea in the first 30 minutes after surger
in late apnea, there was evidence that regional anesthesia reduced the
risk of
significant apnea
in the first 30 minutes after surger
in the first 30 minutes after surgery.
It's a
significant difference, and even a small rise
in testosterone and other hormones may heighten
risks for autism.
In addition, there were no
significant differences between PPI drug substances and the associated
risk of hip fracture.
The
differences in risk were reduced, but remained statistically
significant after adjusting for several factors, including age, race, BMI, birth control use, hormone replacement therapy, number of pregnancies, physical activity and alcohol consumption.
In a comparison of mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic mitral valves among patients 50 to 69 years of age undergoing mitral valve replacement, there was no significant difference in survival at 15 years, although there were differences in risk of reoperation, bleeding and stroke, according to a study in the April 14 issue of JAM
In a comparison of mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic mitral valves among patients 50 to 69 years of age undergoing mitral valve replacement, there was no
significant difference in survival at 15 years, although there were differences in risk of reoperation, bleeding and stroke, according to a study in the April 14 issue of JAM
in survival at 15 years, although there were
differences in risk of reoperation, bleeding and stroke, according to a study in the April 14 issue of JAM
in risk of reoperation, bleeding and stroke, according to a study
in the April 14 issue of JAM
in the April 14 issue of JAMA.
For women, being a farmer was not associated with a
significant difference in hip fracture
risk.
No
significant difference was seen between the groups of patients
in risk for intracranial bleeding (Table 2).
There was no
significant difference in the cardiovascular
risk profile between the 66 men and the whole cohort at the age of 50 y (data not shown).
However, no statistically
significant difference was seen
in 2 - year PFS between patients
in the intermediate - and high -
risk groups.
There were no
significant differences in mortality
risk observed between the «Healthy diet» group and the «Refined grains» or «Breakfast cereal» groups.
You may make a
significant difference in your overall health and reduce your
risk of dementia or Alzheimer's disease when you purposefully include the foods your brain needs to function and detoxify.
In those with low vitamin A intake, high vitamin D was associated with lowered
risk, while those with higher intake of vitamin A, the
risk difference wasn't
significant between low and high vitamin D levels.
However, other studies have found no
difference in risk associated with moderate versus high levels of protein intake, and even when
differences have been found, they have not turned out to be statistically
significant.
No
significant differences in weight loss, strength gain, or cardio metabolic
risk factor reductions were seen.
Differences in smoking practices also show
significant risk for instability.
Although there was no statistically
significant difference on mean beginning level of regular education, special education, and at -
risk students, results showed that upper - class special education males and ninth - grade at -
risk females had the largest increase
in mean ending level within the program.
Because of the
significant difference in costs structures, E-publishers can take more
risks with new writers.
Whereas Contract for
Difference (CFD) trading protects investors from stock specific
risks or a declining market, choosing to invest heavily
in emerging technologies or economies leaves a trader exposed to the threat of
significant losses.
The
difference in breakdown is
significant, but so is the
risk, with each investor deciding their own trade - off.
Once a portfolio of bonds is created, the sampled portfolio is optimized and tested to see whether there is a
significant difference in the past
risk and return of the portfolio and the index the portfolio is trying to track.
Significant changes
in interest rates expose reinsurance companies to the
risk of reduced investment income or actual losses based on the
difference between the interest rates earned on investments and the credited interest rates paid on outstanding reinsurance contracts.
Differences in risk between categories were not statistically
significant.
The hypothesis linking adjuvant - induced chronic inflammation to sarcoma formation has been suggested by several authors beginning
in the early 1990s.3 - 5 Controversy over the role of adjuvant
in sarcoma pathogenesis intensified with the publication of a limited number of studies suggesting there was no
significant difference in FISS
risk posed by adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted vaccines.10, 11,19 No studies have been published that suggest an adjuvanted vaccine is safer than a nonadjuvanted vaccine, with respect to FISS
risk.
It ignores the pipeline's
significant risk for toxic spills, ignores its catastrophic impacts on our climate, and ignores the clear consensus among financial analysts and oil executives who agree Keystone XL will make the
difference in tar sands development.»
Hard for me to digest
in a single sitting but at the
risk of another «well duh» a
significant difference seems to be
in Curry's use of 30 year periods and Schmidts dismissal of these as being too short to accurately evaluate the effects of natural factors.
And again, the higher the thermometer climbs, the greater the possible disparities
in the adaptive capacity of regions: ``... local warming of about 4 [degrees Celsius] and higher above pre-industrial levels is projected to result
in differences between crop production and its population - driven demand becoming increasingly large
in many regions (high confidence), thus posing very
significant risks and challenges to food security.
For Carbon Storage, 10 % Forest Cover ≠ Forest Certainly a good thing: Creating ways to help farmers financially benefit by preserving forests on their lands is a vital part of combatting climate change — but (at the
risk of being too snarky) I can't help but thinking that the
differences in carbon storage of a particular area of land when it's an actual forest and when it's only got 10 % of its original tree cover is pretty
significant.
This approach and their experience
in catastrophic cases make a
significant difference in the successful handling of the large exposure case with
risks that require special management.
The
difference in risks experienced by renters
in various parts of the state is also
significant, and frequently overlooked.
The researchers found that there were no
significant differences between former smokers and nonsmokers
in the
risk for dying from heart disease or any cause.
From a life insurance underwriter's perspective, there is a
significant difference in the «
risk» perception of a smoker and non-smoker while offering a pure life cover.
Previous studies also failed to show
significant differences in pregnancy or abortion rates among women with advance provisions of EC.6, 7,19 It is possible that the effect of increased access on pregnancy rates is truly negligible because EC is not as effective as found
in the single - use clinical trials, or because women at highest
risk do not use EC frequently enough or at all.
In reality, making a
significant and sustainable
difference to the level of
risk requires a more strategic and sustained approach.
For example, some have found
significant differences between children with divorced and continuously married parents even after controlling for personality traits such as depression and antisocial behavior
in parents.59 Others have found higher rates of problems among children with single parents, using statistical methods that adjust for unmeasured variables that,
in principle, should include parents» personality traits as well as many genetic influences.60 And a few studies have found that the link between parental divorce and children's problems is similar for adopted and biological children — a finding that can not be explained by genetic transmission.61 Another study, based on a large sample of twins, found that growing up
in a single - parent family predicted depression
in adulthood even with genetic resemblance controlled statistically.62 Although some degree of selection still may be operating, the weight of the evidence strongly suggests that growing up without two biological parents
in the home increases children's
risk of a variety of cognitive, emotional, and social problems.