Sentences with phrase «significant differences in test scores»

Attempting to show that even a well - managed school district can't close achievement gaps in student learning, McRae showed Fraisse data from the state Department of Education showing significant differences in test scores between African - American and Latino students and white students in some of the administrator's former school districts.

The results showed there were no statistically significant differences in test scores or students» assessments of the flipped classes compared to a traditional lecture course of study.

Similarly, a study of Washington, D.C.'s, voucher program found no significant difference in test scores between students who received vouchers and those who did not.

Not exact matches

Comparing national test scores, Catholic schools in general (as with most private schools) perform better in both reading and math than public schools although the advantage is stronger in reading than in Math though the difference in Math was still statistically significant; however, this could be due to the self selecting nature of the students in Catholic schools where the parents have made the decision to value education to the extent of paying for it.

A paired - samples t - test demonstrated significant differences with small to medium effect sizes in the before and after scores for all three subscales.

There was a borderline statistically significant difference in balance scores associated with different lengths of breast feeding, whereas no association was found between duration of breast feeding and the two other motor development tests.

In the case of a significant F score, a Bonferroni post hoc test was performed to determine where significant differences lay.

It cites 2011 TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) data showing no significant difference in the scores of Australian boys and girls in Year 4 and Year 8, and notes that male and female students perform equally in international comparative testing in Singapore — a top five country in PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) mathematics.

This statistically significant difference of -0.23 standard deviations is in the opposite direction of that expected, based on the student - level relationships between self - control and test - score gains displayed above.

Only in Dayton were there minor differences in the pre-lottery test scores: those offered a voucher scored 6.5 percentile points lower in math and 3.1 points lower in reading than those not offered a scholarship, a statistically significant difference.

The study found «no significant difference between the samples in reading test scores as a result of chronological age

Differences between the two tests in the utility of the cutoff scores in English language arts are not statistically significant.

Looking at earlier test scores and demographic characteristics, we find no statistically significant differences between the lotteried - in and lotteried - out groups.

These and the other scattered marginally significant contrasts in the table seem likely to be chance findings, a conclusion supported by the F statistics at the bottom of each column, which test the joint hypothesis that all differences in baseline test scores and background characteristics in the column are 0.

By year four, there was no statistically significant difference in math test scores between students who remained in private schools and the matched comparison group.

Scores for 17 - year - olds, the third age group tested by NAEP, are a point or two higher than they were in the 1970s but the difference is not statistically significant.

Despite promises from achievement school district backers that some of Tennessee's most troubled schools would be vaulted into the top 25 percent of schools statewide, standardized testing scores have shown no «statistically significant» difference in the district's schools, according to Henry's research.

One academy has a much larger special ed populace than the other, and this plays out as a significant difference in academic culture and test scores.

Though Brizard touts improvements in graduation rates and test scores among his accomplishments in his 3 1/2 years, opinion is sharply divided on whether he has made a significant difference in the performance of the district's largely low - income black and Latino students....

In fact, the company says, in New York there was no significant test - score difference between students who attended private school on vouchers and those who stayed in public schooIn fact, the company says, in New York there was no significant test - score difference between students who attended private school on vouchers and those who stayed in public schooin New York there was no significant test - score difference between students who attended private school on vouchers and those who stayed in public schooin public school.

The results show an increase in disposition scores from pre -(3.580, SD = 0.499) to postsurvey (4.705, SD = 0.276) of 1.125 (95 % CI = 0.807 — 1.443), and a paired samples t - test revealed that the mean difference was statistically significant (t = 7.649; p <.001).

The states differ significantly in the racial or ethnic composition of students and in the characteristics of the families of students, so it would be expected that a significant part of the differences in the NAEP test scores might be accounted for by these differences.

2000 Results began to demonstrate that the changes in Finland's educational system were making a significant difference as demonstrated by scoring third on a global assessment, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a standardized test given to 15 - year - olds in approximately 40 countries.

A series of articles underscored significant differences in teachers» influence on test scores, even within the same schools.

In addition, this questionnaire presents good test — retest reliability, even for testing after 6 months (correlation coefficients from 0.60 to 0.90, except for bodily pain (0.43)-RRB-.53 Finally, the SF - 36 is sensitive to change, 57 with a difference of 5 points in scale scores being clinically significant, as suggested by Ware et al. In addition, this questionnaire presents good test — retest reliability, even for testing after 6 months (correlation coefficients from 0.60 to 0.90, except for bodily pain (0.43)-RRB-.53 Finally, the SF - 36 is sensitive to change, 57 with a difference of 5 points in scale scores being clinically significant, as suggested by Ware et al. in scale scores being clinically significant, as suggested by Ware et al. 58

There were no statistically significant differences in Whiteley - 7 scores at index consultation between patients completing the questionnaires and patients declining to complete at any follow - up times (Mann - Whitney U test, p > 0.086 or higher)(details available from the authors on request).

There were no statistically significant (p > 0.36, Mann - Whitney U test) differences in PCS or MCS scores at index between patients completing the questionnaires and non-completers, nor at any of the follow - up periods.

Results of grouped t tests and Mann - Whitney U tests to show t or z values, degrees of freedom, and p values for the significant differences in the changes in scores between the control and intervention group

A t - test showed significant differences in relationship scores by gender (t = 2.22, p < 0.05), location (urban vs. rural)(t = 3.33, p < 0.01) and family type (single - child family vs. non-single child family)(t = 3.72, p < 0.001).

In this analysis alone, intake CD4 cell counts (t = − 2.1, P <.04) and Karnofsky severity (t = − 2.2, P <.04) were associated with endpoint BDI score, and the post hoc Tukey least significant difference test showed a trend for CBT to outperform SP (P =.06).

In tests of the main study hypotheses, the experimental group showed a significant decrease in attachment anxiety after the online program, t (25) = 4.69, p <.001, d = 1.03, but no decrease in attachment avoidance, t (25) = -0.96, p =.35, d = 0.19, and there was no significant difference between the two study groups on either change in anxiety scores, controlling for baseline avoidance, F (1, 47) = 0.39, p =.54, η2p =.008, or change in avoidance scores, controlling for baseline anxiety, F (1, 47) = 0.49, p =.49, η2p =.010, from pre-test to post-tesIn tests of the main study hypotheses, the experimental group showed a significant decrease in attachment anxiety after the online program, t (25) = 4.69, p <.001, d = 1.03, but no decrease in attachment avoidance, t (25) = -0.96, p =.35, d = 0.19, and there was no significant difference between the two study groups on either change in anxiety scores, controlling for baseline avoidance, F (1, 47) = 0.39, p =.54, η2p =.008, or change in avoidance scores, controlling for baseline anxiety, F (1, 47) = 0.49, p =.49, η2p =.010, from pre-test to post-tesin attachment anxiety after the online program, t (25) = 4.69, p <.001, d = 1.03, but no decrease in attachment avoidance, t (25) = -0.96, p =.35, d = 0.19, and there was no significant difference between the two study groups on either change in anxiety scores, controlling for baseline avoidance, F (1, 47) = 0.39, p =.54, η2p =.008, or change in avoidance scores, controlling for baseline anxiety, F (1, 47) = 0.49, p =.49, η2p =.010, from pre-test to post-tesin attachment avoidance, t (25) = -0.96, p =.35, d = 0.19, and there was no significant difference between the two study groups on either change in anxiety scores, controlling for baseline avoidance, F (1, 47) = 0.39, p =.54, η2p =.008, or change in avoidance scores, controlling for baseline anxiety, F (1, 47) = 0.49, p =.49, η2p =.010, from pre-test to post-tesin anxiety scores, controlling for baseline avoidance, F (1, 47) = 0.39, p =.54, η2p =.008, or change in avoidance scores, controlling for baseline anxiety, F (1, 47) = 0.49, p =.49, η2p =.010, from pre-test to post-tesin avoidance scores, controlling for baseline anxiety, F (1, 47) = 0.49, p =.49, η2p =.010, from pre-test to post-test.

Mean group differences were compared via t tests, and differences in rates of clinically significant CBCL T scores were compared with χ2 analyses.