Sentences with phrase «significant differences in treatment»

In the only controlled, randomized scientific study to compare graduated extinction and «positive routines» head - to - head, there were no significant differences in treatment outcomes for kids (Adams and Rickert 1989).

Not exact matches

The different tax treatments of a brokerage, annuity, and tax - deferred IRA, along with fees for those accounts, could create a significant difference in the final value of the investment.

An important dividing line in the debate is whether one sees a significant moral difference between killing by euthanasia / PAS and allowing to die by withdrawing useless, cure - oriented, life - sustaining treatment.

Some modest but statistically significant differences emerged between the accelerated and conventional treatment arms in shorter - term bowel and urinary side effects.

«We found that there were no significant differences in the blood levels of pig SMN after knock - down and no evidence of human SMN after treatment.

These are some of the findings of a recent study published in the journal Psychiatric Services, which reported significant racial - ethnic differences in diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric conditions across 11 private, not - for - profit U.S. healthcare delivery systems.

There was no significant increase in adverse events with any of the treatments over the control group, nor was there any difference in malaria incidence between groups during the one year period after the study treatment was stopped, suggesting that monthly administration of DP is a safe and effective treatment for reducing malaria among infants in regions with year - round transmission and high resistance to antifolates.

«In all three of these measures of treatment outcome we found significant differences between before - and after the switch to biological treatment, both at 3 - 5 months after the switch and also sustained over the entire observed timespan,» says Marcus Schmitt - Egenolf.

With regard to survival time, the differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant in favour of ruxolitinib in all of the four analysis dates.

For the subsequent three years, there was no longer a significant difference between the two groups in the number of patients who required surgical treatment for an SCC.

However, those differences were not significant in further analysis and authors, overall, found no differential patient treatment related to race or social class biases.

There were also no significant differences between treatment groups in changes in 6 - minute walk distance.

The authors write that one explanation for lack of statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in all - type cancer incidence is that the study group had higher baseline vitamin D (serum 25 - hydroxyvitamin D) levels compared with the U.S. population.

There was no significant difference in functional independence at 3 months between the treatment groups.

The groups showed no significant differences in the number of treatment failures requiring patients to take more medication, no difference in the number of asthma attacks and no difference in their need for emergency care.

There was no significant difference in costs between DBT and DM episodes within the diagnosis or cancer treatment windows.

Although both study groups showed a statistically significant decrease at six months compared with baseline -LRB--14.1 mmHg for renal denervation compared to -11.7 mmHg for the sham treatment control), the difference of -2.29 mmHg in office systolic blood pressure between the two arms was not significant.

The trial was designed with this anticipated attrition rate, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed that there were no significant differences in the risk profiles between patients who underwent the assigned surgical treatment and those who withdrew, Adams said.

«Exploratory analyses of several secondary outcomes indicated that the sedation protocol was associated with a difference in patients» sedation experience; patients in the intervention group were able to be safely managed in a more awake and calm state while intubated, receiving fewer days of opioid exposure and fewer sedative classes without an increase in inadequate pain or sedation management or clinically significant iatrogenic [consequence of treatment] withdrawal compared with patients receiving usual care, but they experienced more days with reported pain and agitation, suggesting a complex relationship among wakefulness, pain, and agitation,» the authors write.

Among adults motivated to quit smoking, 12 weeks of treatment with a nicotine patch, the drug varenicline, or combination nicotine replacement therapy produced no significant differences in confirmed rates of smoking abstinence at 26 or 52 weeks, raising questions about the current relative effectiveness of intense smoking cessation pharmacotherapies, according to a study in the January 26 issue of JAMA.

In a report of the study's findings, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on March 6, researchers compared professional pest management treatments plus education with education alone and found no significant differences in asthma symptoms or mouse allergen exposure between the two groupIn a report of the study's findings, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on March 6, researchers compared professional pest management treatments plus education with education alone and found no significant differences in asthma symptoms or mouse allergen exposure between the two groupin the Journal of the American Medical Association on March 6, researchers compared professional pest management treatments plus education with education alone and found no significant differences in asthma symptoms or mouse allergen exposure between the two groupin asthma symptoms or mouse allergen exposure between the two groups.

Among adults motivated to quit smoking, 12 weeks of open - label treatment with nicotine patch, varenicline, or C - NRT produced no significant differences in biochemically confirmed rates of smoking abstinence at 26 or 52 weeks.

I chose to specialize in the treatment and care of people with inflammatory bowel disease, which primarily includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, because this was an area of medicine in which I felt I could make a significant and meaningful difference for my patients and in the overall advancement of research and science.

«The goal of establishing this new level of certification is to recognize the significant differences in resources, staff and training that are necessary for the treatment of complex stroke cases,» according to the Joint Commission.

[35] The first randomized, controlled study of DBS for the treatment of TRD targeting the ventral capsule / ventral striatum area did not demonstrate a significant difference in response rates between the active and sham groups at the end of a 16 - week study.

September 22, 2015 Probiotic formula reverses cow's milk allergies by changing gut bacteria of infants The gut bacteria of infants who developed tolerance to cow's milk after treatment with probiotic formula showed significant differences from those who remained allergic, according to a new study published September 22, 2015, in The ISME Journal by scientists from the University of Chicago, Argonne National Laboratory and the University of Naples Federico II, Italy.

WASHINGTON (June 30, 2017)-- Based on a new molecular study of tissues biopsied from various parts of the upper digestive tract, researchers at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center have identified significant, if subtle, differences in gene mutations and other factors that could help in developing more tailored treatment options for cancer patients.

«Handled sensitively, inquiries about a person's childhood experiences can make a significant difference to how treatment proceeds and the types of support that can be put into place,» study lead author Jasper Palmier - Claus said in the news release.

Moreover, there were significant time by treatment interactions for EE, RQ, and TEF, reflecting differences in the 24 - hour pattern of energy metabolism.

Although the combined treatment of oral progestogens with percutaneous progesterone significantly decreased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.5; 95 % confidence interval 0.2 - 0.9) as compared with nonusers, there was no significant difference in the risk of breast cancer in percutaneous progesterone users versus nonusers among oral progestogen users.

In all studies, there was greater weight loss in the treatment group compared with the placebo group, but this difference was significant in only 3 studieIn all studies, there was greater weight loss in the treatment group compared with the placebo group, but this difference was significant in only 3 studiein the treatment group compared with the placebo group, but this difference was significant in only 3 studiein only 3 studies.

There was no significant difference between the earnings of females in the treatment and control group.

The researchers also point out there were 1290 unique school and grade combinations in the study sample — an average of 40 students per combination — which meant it «lacked statistical power to find significant differences between treatment conditions or grade levels».

There was no significant difference in the performance of the two groups within treatments.

2 In follow - up work with fifth graders, there were significant differences in favor of the treatment group on the Florida Science tesIn follow - up work with fifth graders, there were significant differences in favor of the treatment group on the Florida Science tesin favor of the treatment group on the Florida Science test.

After one year of AMSTI implementation, students in the treatment schools scored, on average, two percentile points higher on the SAT 10 mathematics problem solving assessment than their control group counterparts, and the difference was statistically significant.

There is a subtle difference in the tax treatment of qualifying vs disqualifying dispositions even in situations where ownership has been for more than a year to qualify for long - term capital gains — this can be significant in cases where the share price has gone down since the purchase:

While there is not a cure for heart disease, early detection and treatment can make a significant difference in the quality of your pet's life!

In the fight against various feline diseases, early detection makes a significant difference in the scope and effectiveness of treatmenIn the fight against various feline diseases, early detection makes a significant difference in the scope and effectiveness of treatmenin the scope and effectiveness of treatment.

(ref) In an extensive 2017 study, there was no significant differences in the life span of dogs that responded to darbepoetin treatment and those that did noIn an extensive 2017 study, there was no significant differences in the life span of dogs that responded to darbepoetin treatment and those that did noin the life span of dogs that responded to darbepoetin treatment and those that did not.

In consideration for treatment, there are significant differences in management of the diabetic cats versus diabetic dogIn consideration for treatment, there are significant differences in management of the diabetic cats versus diabetic dogin management of the diabetic cats versus diabetic dogs.

Knowledge of the most commonly isolated microorganisms in the canine eye in a geographic area and their antibiotic susceptibility is important to provide the most efficacious antimicrobial treatment (Gerding et al., 1988), because significant geographic differences occur in the types of organisms present (Slatter, 1981; Gerding and Kakoma, 1990).

Again, the results were similar — no significant difference between the two treatment groups - BUT because the treatment groups were NOT the same, the study, in fact, compared the proverbial «apple to the orange».

Our study was powered to detect significant differences in pregnancy rates in comparisons between the control group, clinic access, and either of the 2 treatment groups.

In no case was a significant difference observed between the treatment groups, or between those who dropped out before the 9 - year follow - up and those who did not drop out, on the baseline measures (see Supplemental Information).

Although we were gratified to achieve a 78 % retention rate in the study during 3 years, there remain significant differences in the demographic composition of nonrespondents in the intervention group compared with the UC group, and within the randomized treatment groups as well.

There were no significant differences in total hours of therapy, however, when all study - provided and non — study - provided treatment hours (group, individual, case management, day treatment, and inpatient treatment) were summed.

Neither the one - or two - year data yielded any significant differences between families in the treatment and control groups.50 Early Start also examined CPS referrals and substantiated cases and found no differences for either measure between treatment and control families — 21 percent of control families had contact with CPS agencies, compared with 20 percent of program families.51

Significant differences (p >.05) in characteristics between non-daily and daily smokers entering gambling treatment programs

Doses of drugs over the trial were converted to mean daily equivalents of chlorpromazine and compared across groups by means of Kruskal - Wallis one way analysis of variance; this indicated no significant differences between treatment groups (medians of daily drugs in chlorpromazine equivalents: cognitive behaviour therapy 425, supportive counselling 517.75, routine care 450; χ = 0.963; P = 3D0.62).