Sentences with phrase «significant differences to outcomes»

Research has demonstrated that appropriate early intervention can make significant differences to outcomes for individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

The rules of international divorce are complicated but your choices can make a significant difference to the outcome, both financially and personally.

Having a legal team on your side that speaks the same language can make a significant difference to the outcome of a matter.

Not exact matches

The authors of Goals Gone Wild also cautioned that when people fail to achieve their goals, a «significant portion» lie to make up the difference between their actual accomplishment and the anticipated outcome.

For general clinical state there was also no significant difference between groups (5 RCTs, n = 2705, RR intermediate or bad outcome 0.98 CI 0.86 to 1.11).

In the only controlled, randomized scientific study to compare graduated extinction and «positive routines» head - to - head, there were no significant differences in treatment outcomes for kids (Adams and Rickert 1989).

«We found small but meaningful differences in developmental outcomes between late preterm infants and full term groups, which if applied to larger populations, may have potentially significant long term public health implications,» says lead author Prachi Shah, M.D., a developmental and behavioral pediatrician at U-M's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital.

Researchers supporting co-parenting identified a number of fundamental methodological flaws of recent studies that challenge co-parenting of infants and young children: the failure to interview both parents, small and non-representative samples and use of unreliable and invalid measures, and the fact that even these studies have actually found no significant differences in child outcomes in single versus co-parenting families.

And I am not pursuing here the significant challenges, offered by David Denver and others, to the Nuffield argument that constituency campaigning usually makes limited difference to the overall outcome.

«We did not see statistically significant differences between hatha yoga and a control group (health education) at 10 weeks, however, when we examined outcomes over a period of time including the three and six months after yoga classes ended, we found yoga was superior to health education in alleviating depression symptoms.»

«In all three of these measures of treatment outcome we found significant differences between before - and after the switch to biological treatment, both at 3 - 5 months after the switch and also sustained over the entire observed timespan,» says Marcus Schmitt - Egenolf.

The researchers found no statistically significant difference between rates of asthma (including childhood - onset asthma), atopic dermatitis, or IgE levels in people with or without any of the four genetic changes associated with lower levels of 25 - hydroxyvitamin D. However, the results do not exclude an association between the outcomes and levels of 1,25 - dihydroxyvitamin D, the active form of the vitamin, and more work will be needed to determine if the results hold true in non-European populations and in people with vitamin D deficiency.

«Exploratory analyses of several secondary outcomes indicated that the sedation protocol was associated with a difference in patients» sedation experience; patients in the intervention group were able to be safely managed in a more awake and calm state while intubated, receiving fewer days of opioid exposure and fewer sedative classes without an increase in inadequate pain or sedation management or clinically significant iatrogenic [consequence of treatment] withdrawal compared with patients receiving usual care, but they experienced more days with reported pain and agitation, suggesting a complex relationship among wakefulness, pain, and agitation,» the authors write.

While zonisamide also decreased both UPDRS Part II (off - time) and UPDRS total scores compared to placebo (UPDRS Part II [off - time] scores: WMD, — 0.79; UPDRS total scores: WMD, — 2.51), there were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes between the two groups.

The significant difference in outcome achieved by transplantation of hGDAsBMP versus hGDAsCNTF demonstrates clearly that not all astrocytes are equivalent in respect to their therapeutic value, and this appears to be the first study demonstrating functional differences between different human astrocyte populations with respect to repairing the adult central nervous system.

Additionally, within each of the 7 specific categories of clinical research (October 2002 council only), there were no significant differences in review outcomes for applications reviewed by study sections reviewing 1 % to 25 % clinical applications compared with outcomes in study sections reviewing larger percentages of clinical applications.

There was no significant difference in attainment progress between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4 outcomes after two years between converter academies and similar non-academy schools in 2013, although ceiling effects could limit the extent to which differences between these higher performing schools can be observed.

Evidence points to the improvement - focused messaging having a stronger impact on both credit attainment and student attendance, though the size of the study limits our ability to call the difference in outcomes between positive and improvement messaging statistically significant.

Yet «these gains became ambiguous as time went on» and «did not lead to many improved outcomes in adulthood... with, for example, no statistically significant differences in high school graduation rates, employment, or criminal activity.»

After analyzing student outcome data and comparing current student performance with annual yearly progress benchmarks for student achievement, the leadership team agrees that there are significant differences in outcomes among students of diverse racial, ethnic, cultural and linguistic backgrounds unrelated to socioeconomic status???.

Under the leadership of a visionary Executive Headteacher with a proven track record in school improvement and a Senior Leadership Team committed to making a difference and achieving the best possible outcomes for our pupils, the academies are already showing significant improvement.

To be sure, a variety of societal and individual factors — such as the income level of a student's family — also affect educational outcomes.30 But when controlling for these factors, teacher quality makes a significant difference for students» test scores and other educational outcomes.

• Differences with the private sector: Higher - education faculty members tend to be older, more educated, and have higher incomes than the working population as a whole, and the structural pension plan design differences in the higher - education sector also make a significant contribution to the better retirement outcomes expected Differences with the private sector: Higher - education faculty members tend to be older, more educated, and have higher incomes than the working population as a whole, and the structural pension plan design differences in the higher - education sector also make a significant contribution to the better retirement outcomes expected differences in the higher - education sector also make a significant contribution to the better retirement outcomes expected by faculty.

-- that, unlike the Water Vapour feedback's easily calculated linear growth which AR5's scenarios incorporate, the other six main non-linear feedbacks could be assumed to make no significant difference to the scenarios» outcomes, despite multiple, clear and un-refuted lines of published evidence to the contrary.

On the other hand, most statistically significant outcomes often have to do with single angles that produce some behavior but the system is adaptive and can thus get around the difference in one way or another.

Changes in industry - specific market conditions, significant technological breakthroughs, and new laws or regulations subsequent to the publication of an AEO can also lead to differences between projections and realized outcomes.

One of the more famous studies that has been cited by the National Institute of Health, among other research papers, is Melanie Dreher's «Prenatal Marijuana Exposure and Neonatal Outcomes in Jamaica,» published by the University of Massachusetts and the American Academy of Pediatrics, which also found no significant difference in birth weight, and actually found substantial benefits to children who were born.

Hiring a team of experienced and aggressive attorneys to fight on your behalf can make a significant difference on the outcome of your case.

However, the differences in processes are significant, even if they often seek to achieve the same outcome.

Research shows that child health, early childhood education and family support programs can make a significant difference to improving outcomes for children.

Because analyses reported below revealed significant differences between the full intervention and control groups at age 18 years, analyses were conducted to ascertain the equivalence of these 2 groups on factors that might influence outcomes.

However, the outcomes were measured only 1 — 2 weeks after the baby was born (1 +).12 The introduction of the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale programme in the NICU made no significant difference to parental stress levels and maternal — infant interactions when assessed at discharge and at 3 months after discharge (1 +).20 One RCT found that coaching parents on how to interact with their preterm infant made no difference to knowledge of care, sensitivity to the infant or satisfaction in parenting compared with the control group (1 ---RRB-.21 However, this may have been confounded by the amount of contact that the control mothers had with the researchers, as these mothers reported that they enjoyed having someone show an interest in them.

EIP showed favorable impacts on 8 outcomes, including fewer days and episodes of hospitalization, relative to those in the comparison group, covering a range of 6 weeks to 2 years postpartum.13, 23,24 EIP also showed a favorable effect on the percentage of children who were adequately immunized by 1 year, but the difference was no longer statistically significant by 2 years.13, 24 Early Start demonstrated favorable effects on 3 outcomes, including percentage who received well - child visits and dental service.25 — 27 HFA had favorable results for 4 health care outcomes, such as the number of well - child visits and whether the child had health insurance.28 — 31 HFA had an unfavorable effect on the number of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits.32 The research showed that Healthy Steps had a beneficial effect on 2 outcomes: 1 - month well - child visits and diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and pertussis vaccinations.33 Finally, NFP had favorable results on 3 outcomes measuring the number of ED visits at different follow - ups but an unfavorable / ambiguous effect on number of days hospitalized between 25 and 50 months.34, 35 The research on 2 programs (Oklahoma's CBFRS and PAT) showed no effects on measures of health care use or coverage.36 — 40 The research on 5 programs (Child FIRST, EHS, Family Check - Up, HIPPY, and PALS for Infants) did not report health care coverage or usage outcomes.

At 4 - to 6 - month followup, treatment gains were maintained in both treatment groups on four of seven outcome variables, but there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

As shown in Table 5, multilevel analyses found that, as rated by teachers, beneficial outcomes were generally maintained (as indicated by the lack of statistically significant differences between groups) or continued to improve following ROE completion, with one exception: Some of the ROE1 gain in prosocial behaviour was not maintained.

Most studies were small and none of the studies reported a power calculation to estimate the number of individuals required in order to detect a significant difference in effect for the outcomes measured.

This dyadic approach revealed significant gender differences regarding how the supportive role enacted (i.e., provider versus recipient) contributed considerably to marital outcomes.