The most commonly cited school choice review, by economists Cecilia Rouse and Lisa Barrow, declares that it will focus on the evidence from existing experimental studies but then leaves out four such studies (three of which reported positive choice effects) and includes one study that was non-experimental (and found
no significant effect of choice).
Not exact matches
A
significant amount
of research has explored the paralyzing
effect of too many
choices.
The Milwaukee school
choice program and the response
of Milwaukee Public Schools are especially
significant in light
of Frederick M. Hess's study
of the
effects of competition on large urban school districts.
Despite the vast majority
of randomized control trials (RCTs)
of private school
choice showing
significant, positive test score
effects for at least some subgroups
of students, some
of those gains have been modest and other
effects have been null for at least some subgroups.
Using Tax Lots to Your Advantage Your
choice of cost basis method can have a
significant effect on the computation
of capital gains and losses when you sell shares.
Your
choices in Chrono Trigger amounted to choosing party combination, which had a
significant effect on how you played (because
of the combos), and choosing between accessories / the occasional other equipment slot.
The «other papers» concerned were designed specifically to test the robustness
of Mann's results to methodological and data
choices and they both found that the
choice of PCA selection and other criticisms have no
significant effect on the conclusions
of the MBH studies.
As the distribution obtained by combining all independent evidence is narrower than any
of the evidence separately, the
choice of prior will have a lesser influence on the outcome, but it may still have a
significant effect.
However, the relation is complex: Only when prosumers have the
choice between self - consumption and sale
of the surplus electricity production to the grid we observe a statistically
significant effect on consumption behavior.
Given that, if one wants freedom
of choice and an efficient market, shouldn't one accept a market solution (tax / credit or analogous system based on public costs, applied strategically to minimize paperwork (don't tax residential utility bills — apply upstream instead), applied approximately fairly to both be fair and encourage an efficient market response (don't ignore any
significant category, put all sources
of the same emission on equal footing; if cap / trade, allow some exchange between CO2 and CH4, etc, based CO2 (eq); include ocean acidification, etc.), allowing some approximation to that standard so as to not get very high costs in dealing with small details and also to address the biggest, most - well understood
effects and sources first (put off dealing with the costs and benifits
of sulphate aerosols, etc, until later if necessary — but get at high - latitude black carbon right away)?
A few pounds here and there can have a
significant effect on our
choice of carrier.