Not exact matches
According to the United Nations, the meat industry is «one
of the top two or three most
significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to
global», and the UN has concluded that a
global shift towards a vegan diet is vital to saving the world from hunger, fuel poverty and the worst
effects of climate change.
The combined
effect of the three, the scientists found, is that the
global energy system could experience unprecedented
changes in the growth
of natural gas production and
significant changes to the types
of energy used, but without much reduction to projected
climate change if new mitigation policies are not put in place to support the deployment
of renewable energy technologies.
In 1996, when
climate research was more certain about the link between fossil fuel combustion and
climate change than during the time
of Shaw's memo, Exxon's new chairman and chief executive Lee Raymond said in a speech in Detroit: «Currently, the scientific evidence is inconclusive as to whether human activities are having a
significant effect on the
global climate.»
Interestingly, the paper «
Climate Trends and Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&
Climate Trends and
Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&r
Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding
of the absence
of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&
climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [
global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&r
global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 %
of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&r
global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share
of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse]
effect due to the lack
of significant climate trends&
climate trends».
This is also the only known
significant effect of man - made
global climate change, both now and in the foreseeable future.
«All 18 periods
of significant climate changes found during the last 7,500 years were entirely caused by corresponding quasi-bicentennial variations
of [total solar irradiance] together with the subsequent feedback
effects, which always control and totally determine cyclic mechanism
of climatic
changes from
global warming to Little Ice Age.»
Therefore, ending their financing for fossil fuel projects would have a
significant effect on mitigating
climate change — an important piece
of keeping
global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius and honoring the commitments made as part
of the Paris agreement last year.
The most likely candidate for that climatic variable force that comes to mind is solar variability (because I can think
of no other force that can
change or reverse in a different trend often enough, and quick enough to account for the historical climatic record) and the primary and secondary
effects associated with this solar variability which I feel are a
significant player in glacial / inter-glacial cycles, counter climatic trends when taken into consideration with these factors which are, land / ocean arrangements, mean land elevation, mean magnetic field strength
of the earth (magnetic excursions), the mean state
of the
climate (average
global temperature), the initial state
of the earth's
climate (how close to interglacial - glacial threshold condition it is) the state
of random terrestrial (violent volcanic eruption, or a random atmospheric circulation / oceanic pattern that feeds upon itself possibly) / extra terrestrial events (super-nova in vicinity
of earth or a random impact) along with Milankovitch Cycles.
Published Scientific Papers have confirmed this, and prescient physical observations now physically confirm the major
effect of this
significant change in the
global climate.