Journalistic integrity demands that
significant errors of fact, as well as errors of omission, should be corrected promptly and as prominently and transparently as warranted.
Not exact matches
In
fact, an
error in the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published in an erratum in a later issue
of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no
significant change in teenage pregnancy rates.
However, the
fact that we find very «precise zeros» — that is, we don't find statistically
significant relationships even though we have the statistical power in our data to detect even very modest relationships — implies that neither measurement
error nor a lack
of sufficient variation are what's driving our inability to detect a relationship between teaching and research quality.
In
fact, the research I reviewed on rigorous evaluations
of long - term outcomes from choice programs suggests that using test scores to decide whether a bunch
of schools should be closed or expanded would lead to
significant Type 1 and Type 2
errors.
It is well known in
fact that
errors in the diet
of adult dogs can lead to a variety
of nutrition - related problems that can have a
significant negative impact on dogs» health and long life.
Brian, You admitted an
error and struck out a
significant portion
of your blog posting but the
facts are still not as clear to most readers as they could be.
Despite the
fact that an average
of models may or may not be physically realistic, the
fact that their average and
error bars all run so much higher than observation, and are so statistically
significant, should not be overlooked with a hand wave.
This might seem trivial but the 6.5 Watts / m ^ 2 is far greater than the 3.71 Watts / m ^ 2 that the CO2 forcing parameter inputs for a doubling
of CO2 so this
error is in
fact significant enough to more than wipe out the entire catastophic global warming predicted for a doubling
of CO2.
The
fact that soot from some diesel engines is a medical problem does not mean that a the volume
of soot is a
significant error in the estimate
of combustion.
Importance: The Court
of Appeal noted support decisions are
fact driven, involve considerable discretion, and should not be overturned unless the decisions reveals: 1) an
error in principle; 2) a
significant misapprehension
of the evidence; or 3) unless the award is clearly wrong; Hickey v Hickey, [1999] 2 SCR 518 (SCC) at para. 11.
«In an opinion released on May 13, 1997, this court sustained two
of the plaintiff's assignments
of error, finding: A review
of the trial court's decision demonstrates that the trial court failed to address the
fact that [the defendant] was awarded a
significant property settlement
of approximately 1.2 million dollars.
For example, in Waxman v. Waxman (2004), 186 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), the Court said at paras. 343 - 344: «The failure to consider relevant evidence can amount to a palpable
error if the evidence was potentially
significant to a material finding
of fact.
This proposed new law would say that when insurers are proven to have made an
error in denying benefits, the insured person is still required to bear a
significant amount
of the loss despite the
fact that they were entirely innocent and relied on their insurer to make the right decision.