Sentences with phrase «significant global warming effects»

There are essentially no global warming effects; There are significant global warming effects.

This report is an early step in studying the potentially significant global warming effect of natural gas leakage in San Francisco.

Not exact matches

Global warming has a significant effect on rice production.

The trend in these responses changed course last year, with slightly fewer Americans saying global warming would have a significant effect in their lifetimes.

The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these effects could be responsible for a significant amount of the recent global warming.

Scientists have long feared that as the world gets warmer, thawing permafrost may lead to a significant effect on global warming.

Habitable, of course, but it would appear that the world will be changing quite substantially — and the long - term effects may be more significant than «global warming.»

The team set out to present its findings «in plain English» to congress and the media — findings which suggested a lack of significant or human - caused global warming while concluding that «if the earth were to warm slightly, and atmospheric CO2 were to increase, the effects would be mostly beneficial.»

One is that the effect of global warming is slow, will warm both north and south poles equally, the change will get significant around 2060, and superimposed on top of that there is a lot of large (not not well - quantified) amplitude «weather» noise.

Not only did acceptance of global warming increase, the most dramatic finding was the neutralization of the effect of worldview, which otherwise had a significant impact.

In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balance.

According to the complaint, the city «has already spent significant funds to study, mitigate, and adapt to the effects of global warming.»

Again, no significant trend of the global averaged Gaa [atmospheric greenhouse effect] is found from 2003 to 2014 (Fig. 2) because the enhanced warming effect over the western tropical Pacific is largely counteracted by the weakened warming influence on the central tropical Pacific.

Interestingly, the paper «Climate Trends and Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&rGlobal food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&rglobal] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&rglobal maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends».

On the other hand, despite the overwhelming evidence that global warming will transform the Earth's climate for centuries, with fearful consequences for human health and wellbeing (not to mention the survival of many species and ecosystems), the world can not agree to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions because of concerns about the effects on economic growth.

In the scorching summer of 1988, when global warming first hit headlines in a significant way, presidential candidate George H.W. Bush used a Michigan speech to pledge meaningful action curbing heat - trapping greenhouse gases, saying, «Those who think we are powerless to do anything about the greenhouse effect forget about the White House effect.»

On the other hand; global warming has a number of significant effects on the environment; including the rising sea levels, melting ices, and lately being associated with possibility to cause stronger Hurricane.

Your graph of the Gallup Poll question as to when the effects of global warming will happen is consistent with the belief that the effects of global warming will not be significant.

** Thus these research studies & papers found «direct experimental evidence for a significant increase in the Earth's greenhouse effect» and Global Warming.

This is because no scientifically valid evidence has been found that increasing human - caused CO2 emissions would result in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) nor that it would even have a statistically significant effect on increasing global temperaGlobal Warming (CAGW) nor that it would even have a statistically significant effect on increasing global temperaglobal temperatures.

Resolved There is significant (or discernible) evidence of anthropogenic global warming, distinct from land use effects and natural variability, over the past

This availability of natural gas supplies does reduce the buildup of greenhouse gasses, but the effects are not very significant in terms of the overall threat of global warming.

All of these enviro - whackpot prognosticators of a global warming Apocalypse lack the intellectual curiosity to even wonder how there can be so much evidence - backed, statistically significant research showing that all past and historical global warming is completely explained by ENSO effects and other natural activity.

KR asks the correct question finally, as to what we would do if human CO2 production was the cause of significant global warming with significant adverse effects.

In this case, substituting wind and solar would have no significant effect on global warming.

While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century.

From the paper: «The results also 1) reveal a significant level of coupling between ocean and land temperatures that remains even after the effects of ENSO and volcanic eruptions have been removed; 2) serve to highlight the improvements in the quality of the time series of global - mean land temperatures with the increase in the areal coverage of the station network from 1951 onward; and 3) yield a residual time series in which the signature of anthropogenically induced global warming is more prominent.»

Pushing for more advanced technologies or establishing regulations could make ICAO's goals more attainable, and have a more significant impact on reducing air travel's effect on global warming.

Global warming is already having significant and costly effects and these consequences will only intensify as the planet's temperature continues to rise.

No matter what the origin is, however, Karen Rosenlof, a member of Solomon's team, says it is now clear that stratospheric water vapour has a significant effect on global warming and that models» inability to take this effect into account is a significant failing.

Little Miss Sunshine forgot that CO2 has a log sensitivity so that early increases prior to 1950 had a significant effect on global warming.

«All 18 periods of significant climate changes found during the last 7,500 years were entirely caused by corresponding quasi-bicentennial variations of [total solar irradiance] together with the subsequent feedback effects, which always control and totally determine cyclic mechanism of climatic changes from global warming to Little Ice Age.»

The challenge, now, is for humans to have significant and positive effect on global warming.

Therefore, ending their financing for fossil fuel projects would have a significant effect on mitigating climate change — an important piece of keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius and honoring the commitments made as part of the Paris agreement last year.

The negative effects of global warming on humans may be most significant on food supplies and security.

However (and thankfully), abandoning old capitalistic and nationalistic get - rich - quick ideologies, collaborating on never - before - seen international levels for the purpose of achieving the greater good of humanity, and all of the adaptation strategies being adopted on local levels across the globe are among the significant positive effects of global warming on humans.

GH effect of CO2 is no more than 1 C. All other significant global warming is said to be from some positive feedback effect.

What we all suspected UHI does have a tremendous effect on surface temps reading so we can conclude maybe 50 % of the warming not significant well in the USA there is no AGW so ther is no global either AGW thank you Mr watts

«What we all suspected UHI does have a tremendous effect on surface temps reading so we can conclude maybe 50 % of the warming not significant well in the USA there is no AGW so ther is no global either AGW thank you Mr wats»

And scientists see that deforestation has a significant effect on climate change, or global warming.

Global warming is already having significant and costly effects on our communities, our health, and our climate.

«Because the effects of volcanic eruptions and of ENSO are very short - term and that of solar variability very small, none of these factors can be expected to exert a significant influence on the continuation of global warming over the coming decades.

Despite his public rejection of global warming, its causes and impacts, Politico reports that Trump filed an application in May of this year to construct a sea wall to protect a golf course property in Ireland from «global warming and its effects» and these same risings seas pose a significant threat to his considerable real estate holdings in New York City and Florida.

Backing that up, NASA says that 1) sea surface temperature fluctuations (El Niño - La Niña) can cause global temperature deviation of about 0.2 °C; 2) solar maximums and minimums produce variations of only 0.1 °C, warmer or cooler; 3) aerosols from natural sources such as volcanic eruptions (Mount Pinatubo for example) have caused average cooling of 0.3 °C, but recent eruptions have had not had significant effect.

The net effect of the remodelling is to create statistically significant warming of 0.7 °C in the ACORN - SAT mean temperature series for Rutherglen: in general agreement with anthropogenic global warming theory.

While the global effect is very limited, significant cooling is shown for Northern Europe, Northern Asia, and North America, with many other regions exhibiting a warming trend.

And as discussed many times on this blog, reducing human - caused CO2 emissions will have no significant effect on global warming, which is a benefit in modest amounts anyway.

Once this happens, the CO2 effect will tend to become a significant factor and by the first decade of the next century we may experience global temperatures warmer than any in the last 1000 years.

If possible at all, delaying the rise by storing water on Antarctica would only show significant effects in a scenario of ambitious climate policy, strictly limiting global warming.

The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these effects could be responsible for a significant amount of the recent global warming.