Sentences with phrase «significant global warming for»

(CNSNews.com)-- Global temperatures collected in five official databases confirm that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 17 years, according to Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH).

When asked about the fact that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 15 years, Pachauri became evasive.

«Sure, they'll probably try to confuse us with trick questions: Like why, apart from natural 1998 and 2015 El Nino spikes, satellites haven't recorded any statistically significant global warming for nearly two decades; why sea levels have been rising at a constant rate of 7 inches per century without acceleration; and why no category 3 - 5 hurricanes have struck the U.S. coast since October 2005 — a record lull since 1900.

After no significant global warming for some 20 + years, the «elites» are finally being embarrassed by the empirical evidence, which doesn't comport with their favorite unicorn science - fantasy.

An article for CNSNews posted last September 30, cited a statement from Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH), that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 17 years.

The earth has had significant Global Warming for some 20,000 years now... The only real argument is to the degree that mans activity has augmented that... We just came out of one - point - five - million years of continuous glaciation with sheets of two mile thick ice down past the 44th parallel... I will cheerfully deal with warming issues over that, any day...

Not exact matches

The Province of B.C. is willing to make significant environmental sacrifices for projects that will bring economic benefits to the Province of B.C.. On the other hand, they will block a project needed by a land - locked sister province, a project that would benefit all of Canada, claiming that they are doing so because they must protect the environment, protect the land from damage and reduce global warming.

It's good for the earth Dairy cows, which are raised in part to make infant formula, are a significant contributor to global warming: Their belching, manure and flatulence (really!)

«The most significant environmental impacts for all three nappy systems were on resource depletion, acidification and global warming,» the authors concluded.

The government's attorneys said in court papers last month that the concentration of 350 ppm of CO2 isn't necessarily dangerous but acknowledged the country bears significant responsibility for fueling global warming (Climatewire, Jan. 18).

Changes in N2 fixation due to global warming will alter N input to arctic ecosystems with significant consequences for plant growth.

«If the winds continue to increase as a result of global warming, then we will continue to see increased energy in eddies and jets that will have significant implications for the ability of the Southern Ocean to store carbon dioxide and heat,» said Dr Hogg.

Boulder, Colo., USA: Cretaceous climate warming led to a significant methane release from the seafloor, indicating potential for similar destabilization of gas hydrates under modern global warming.

Phil Jones says no global warming since 1995 «Phil Jones said that for the past 15 years there has been no «statistically significant» warming.

I participate in YA global warming forum and the deniers there always drop «statistically significant» but he went on to say the average warming for the period I think was 0.2 C yearly which is a slight warning

Dr. Benestad's reasoning is based on the erroneous assumption that if there are no significant trends in some proxies for the solar activity since 1950s the sun is not contributing to the global warming.

The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these effects could be responsible for a significant amount of the recent global warming.

I think this is useful for evaluating emission (and other tangential) reports claims / stories that might lead folks to think we are making significant progress in responding to global warming.

A big factor in those oscillations is ENSO — whether there is a a warm El Niño event, or a cool La Niña event makes an appreciable difference in the global mean anomalies — about 0.1 to 0.2 ºC for significant events.

And even if there was significant uncertainty about the probability of global warming, that would be no cause for complacency, since it could mean that things were going to turn out worse than predicted.

Thus it appears that, provided further satellite cloud data confirms the cosmic ray flux low cloud seeding hypothesis, and no other factors were involved over the past 150 years (e.g., variability of other cloud layers) then there is a potential for solar activity induced changes in cloudiness and irradiance to account for a significant part of the global warming experienced during the 20th century, with the possible exception of the last two decades.

On the contrary, roughly 80 percent of HOT is devoted to on - the - ground reporting that focuses on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise limiting global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative of preparing our societies for the many significant climate impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are now unavoidable over the years ahead.

The scientists found no significant relationship to global warming (there's no trend at all in such blocking events in that region, for instance).

I felt the need to point out that there were so many other disparate sources of evidence for global warming that there was really no question, even if said glitch actually was significant:

has an excellent overview of energy trends in the world — and what would need to happen for the world to curtail its greenhouse gas emissions and avoid significant global warming.

Anyway global warming should not be the most significant concern for Tuvalu.

Last year was the second or third warmest year for annual global temperatures since 1850, after 2015 and 2016, both of which were dominated by a significant El Niño.

This is NOT warm - mongers and the level of scientific doubt about humans being responsible for global warming no significant.

The archive shows only scattered uses of «global warming» (and little more for «climate change») into the 1970s, with a significant rise for «global warming» after 1975.

Monitoring station at the Tian shan «Number 1 Glacier» Global warming is responsible for the significant retreat of the Himalayan glaciers, said Kang Shichang.

Just to add the appropriate emphasis to what the past 164 years of empirical science tell us, the «C3» estimator replica above also reveals what would happen to «global warming» if the entire U.S. economy shuts down for one year, eliminating some 5.8 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion - again, it's a nothing - significant outcome for the climate.

On the other hand, despite the overwhelming evidence that global warming will transform the Earth's climate for centuries, with fearful consequences for human health and wellbeing (not to mention the survival of many species and ecosystems), the world can not agree to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions because of concerns about the effects on economic growth.

As for sea temperatures, they are less significant for analyzing «global warming» than estimated total ocean heat content.

This has been discussed on this very site, with a humorous example of its flaws being that applying it to a global data set (GHCN) instead of just one for the United States reverses the results, finding that adjustments reduce global warming by a significant amount.

The hypothesis then is that multidecadal climate has only two significant components: the sawtooth, whatever its origins, and warming that can be accounted for 99.98 % by the AHH law as measured by the R2 of its fit to observed global warming (and could be brought even closer to 1 with a good story for MRES).

In the North Sea, global warming is affecting plankton and the marine food chain, compounding the pressures of overfishing.3 Future warming is also expected to exert a significant impact on the marine ecosystem, creating further uncertainty for the fishing industry.7, 8,15

** Thus these research studies & papers found «direct experimental evidence for a significant increase in the Earth's greenhouse effect» and Global Warming.

The significant increase in the frequency and the intensity of warm El Niño events between 1976 and 2007 were partly responsible for the glacier depletion process, combined with global warming.

«It claimed that «simply proceeding to the discovery phase of a global warming case» — during which the oil corporations would be required to turn over internal documents — «would be significant» for activists...

Marcott paper Basically the folks at RC have probably made poor ol Marcott respond that the uptick did not matter anyway its not important, significant, robust etc don't rely on it just forget about it please etc but unfortunately for them as Ross MC on Realclimate reply, at CA says «But that is precisely what they do in Figure 3 of their paper, and it is the basis of their claim that «Global temperature, therefore, has risen from near the coldest to the warmest levels of the Holocene within the past century, reversing the long - term cooling trend that began ~ 5000 yr B.P.» Without the uptick in their proxy reconstruction this kind of statement could never have been made.

More Scientific Evidence For CO2's Dubious Climate Impact Emerges Image Source: Robertson and Chilingar, 2017 According to the most basic precepts of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), variations in CO2 concentrations exert significant control on sea surface temperatures, glaciers, sea levels, and generalized climate dynamics (i.e., precipitation patterns).

From Inderscience Publishers and United Nations University: Loss and damage from climate change Despite attempts at adaption losses and damage from climate change are significant An open access special issue of the International Journal of Global Warming brings together, for the first time, empirical evidence of loss and damage from the perspective of affected people...

The trick is to find a time period just short enough so that the trends are not statistically significant anymore, and ta ta, one can claim a «global warming stop» for the time period.

I think you should correct that oversight because for as long as the global warming idea has been around no one has been able to show any significant warming of the Earth.

Perhaps Mr. Steele's strongest point is that the obsession with Global Warming will have an unfair impact on funding for local environmental projects as these efforts have had a significant and direct impact on the survival of plant and animal species.

Yet the linear trend on the Hadley / CRU monthly global temperature anomalies for the 18 years 1995 - 2012 shows no statistically - significant warming, even though the partial pressure of CO2 rose by about a tenth in that time.

In this context, for the Administration to have released a U.S. Climate Action Report with a chapter on climate change impacts that identified a range of likely adverse consequences, based on scientific reports including the National Assessment, could rightly be seen as an anomaly and appeared to be seen as a significant political error by Administration allies dedicated to denying the reality of human - induced global warming as a significant problem.

For longer time periods appropriate to the assessment of trends, however, global temperatures have experienced significant warming for all seasons except winter, when cooling trends exist instead across large stretches of eastern North America and northern EurasFor longer time periods appropriate to the assessment of trends, however, global temperatures have experienced significant warming for all seasons except winter, when cooling trends exist instead across large stretches of eastern North America and northern Eurasfor all seasons except winter, when cooling trends exist instead across large stretches of eastern North America and northern Eurasia.

Which forms the basis for the IPCC claim of high climate sensitivity (mean value of 3.2 C), resulting in significant global warming (up to 6.4 C warming by 2100), «extreme high sea levels», increased «heat waves», increased «heavy rains» and floods, increased «droughts», increased «intense tropical cyclones» — which, in turn, lead to crop failures, disappearance of glaciers now supplying drinking water to millions, increased vector borne diseases, etc. (for short, potentially catastrophic AGW — or «CAGW»).

However, the case for alarm would still be weak even if anthropogenic global warming were significant.