Sentences with phrase «significant jury verdict»

In a homeowners» fire case, she obtained a significant jury verdict for an insurance company client, including a finding of fraud on the part of the policyholder and a $ 330,000 damages award for her client, a verdict which was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Obtained a significant jury verdict for an insurance company client following a nine - day trial in Connecticut federal court.

We have secured significant jury verdicts and sizeable out - of - court settlements for injured individuals and their families in cases involving trucking and transportation accidents, dangerous and defective products, construction accidents, commercial plane crashes, explosions and burns caused by gas and electric power utilities, medical negligence, workplace catastrophes, and business disputes.

The personal injury attorneys at Morgan & Morgan have helped thousands of individuals obtain significant jury verdicts and settlement awards in cases involving car accidents, medical malpractice, nursing home abuse, and wrongful death.

In particular, Mr. Webster has first - chaired several trials and obtained a number of significant jury verdicts for his business clients.

Not exact matches

He has obtained significant settlements and jury verdicts for clients who have been the victim of medical malpractice.

While the award by the jury is significant, there have been larger verdicts in medical malpractice cases in Massachusetts, including a 2005 case in which a jury awarded nearly $ 40 million to the family of a Dracut boy born with severe brain damage after a traumatic delivery.

Kevin has tried a large number of jury cases to verdict in state and federal courts in Connecticut, and boasts a significant win rate.

Mr. Butts has significant trial experience at both the state and federal level, having tried a number of cases to successful verdict, including recently recovering over $ 300,000 for his client after a jury trial determined that the insured homeowner had committed fraud when submitting her claim.

Compiled from the JVRA database, the Product Liability Annual Report provides a national overview of the most significant cases in product liability from the previous year as published in the Jury Verdict Review & Analysis.

CELA members are encouraged to submit materials for publication in the CELA Bulletin, including articles on employment issues, information on recent developments, jury verdicts, significant decisions, and announcements of upcoming seminars.

Frank has served as lead counsel in dozens of significant jury trials (to verdict), and numerous bench trials.

1 For attempts to measure the effect of advocacy quality through other means, see, e.g., Banks Miller et al., Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability, 49 Law & Soc» y Rev. 209 (2015)(finding that high quality representation evened the odds for asylum applicants and that asylum seekers fared better when unrepresented than when represented by a poor lawyer); Mitchell J. Frank & Dr. Osvaldo F. Morera, Professionalism and Advocacy at Trial — Real Jurors Speak in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(finding statistically significant correlations in criminal cases between jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury verdict, and finding statistically significant correlations in civil cases between perceptions of defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make?

But we are also a firm with the genuine ability to take antitrust cases to trial, and we have done so with frequent success, including a defense jury verdict for our client Micron in a multi-billion dollar case that was perhaps the most significant U.S. antitrust jury trial of the past decade.

A Hennepin County jury awarded plaintiff Jesse Bukal a significant monetary verdict after a five - day trial.

He represents both Plaintiffs and Defendants, and has obtained significant six and seven figure jury verdicts and settlements for his clients.

An adverse jury verdict, or even a trial court's summary judgment (which the client might be able to get vacated as part of a settlement in exchange for no appeal) is easier to deal with in future cases, and certainly is not as significant as an adverse decision on appeal, especially one that affirmatively rejects the position advanced for reversal and graphically explains why.

The plaintiff typically will nonetheless attempt to prove damages at trial, as otherwise the jury may conclude that no significant injury resulted from the defamatory statement and return a verdict for nominal damages (e.g., $ 1).

In yet another significant New York personal injury lawsuit, an appeals court has modified downward a jury's pain and suffering verdict with no explanation why, leaving the public clueless, judges and attorneys without guidance as to how to evaluate future cases and the plaintiff with $ 1,325,000 less than the jury awarded him.