Sentences with phrase «significant main effect»

The results indicate significant main effects of culture and gender for both attachment and loneliness, as well as a significant two - way interaction for family loneliness.

Five of the eight variables for child conduct yielded significant main effects.

Follow - up ANCOVAs revealed significant main effects for maternal smoking for two preschool characteristics — activity level, negative emotionality — and marginal, but nonsignificant, effects for two characteristics — stimulation threshold and nonadaptive / unhappy (Table III).

Network density did not reveal significant main effects on males» or females» smoking behavior.

Significant main effects emerged for age, the YPI impulsive - irresponsible scale, gender and sample.

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant main effects of maternal prenatal smoking and a significant interaction between maternal prenatal smoking and mother's history of antisocial behavior in the prediction of children's probability to display high and rising physical aggression.

A statistically significant main effect of gender was found, F (1, 219) = 6.854, p < 0.05.

In the three - way - analysis of variance with partnership, age, and education as factors and the AAS depend as continuous dependent variable (N = 1675), three small but relevant significant main effects of partnership, F (1, 1663) = 24.41, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.01, age, F (2, 1663) = 8.56, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.01, and education, F (1, 1663) = 11.92, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.01 were observed.

Study 1 Abuse Perpetration Foshee and colleagues (2005) found significant main effects of treatment condition on psychological abuse perpetration, moderate physical violence perpetration, and sexual violence perpetration.

The results of their study revealed that DRD2 had a statistically significant main effect on impulsivity, but DRD4 did not.

In our examination of the leadership variable on the six context variables from Round One of the principal survey, we found only a small number of statistically significant main effects, which is not unlike what we see in Table 1.5.2.

However, we noted that the introduction of nonbreastfeeding at 1 y, when the children were 15 mo old, was a significant main effect of the D treatment because 4 women who had not received the D treatment were still providing breastfeeding with complementary foods.

At the 1 - y follow - up, all women from the D and DE groups were not breastfeeding, whereas 2 women from the C and E groups were still breastfeeding with complementary foods, which led to a significant main effect of the D treatment on introducing nonbreastfeeding (P = 0.030).

Significant main effects or interactions in two - way ANOVA were followed by Sidak's post hoc test to compare sedentary versus exercise mice of each genotype.

There was also a significant main effect of weight loss on higher protein and carbohydrate intakes as a percentage of energy.

No significant main effect was evident between groups in total kcal, F (1, 22) = 2.10, p = 0.65; carbohydrates, F (1, 22) = 1.70, p = 0.21; fats, F (1, 22) = 0.56, p = 0.46; or proteins consumed, F (1, 22) = 0.01, p = 0.96.

Additionally, there was no significant main effect of time for total kcal, F (1, 22) = 0.73, p = 0.40; carbohydrates, F (1, 22) = 0.17, p = 0.68; fats, F (1, 22) = 0.14, p = 0.70; or proteins consumed, F (1, 22) = 0.81, p = 0.38.

There was no significant main effect in total body fat percent between groups assessed by DXA, F (1, 22) = 0.01, p = 0.992 and in android fat percent between groups, F (1, 22) = 0.01, p = 0.971 (Table 3).

A 2 - way ANOVA repeated measures test revealed that there was a significant main effect for the foam roller condition on knee joint ROM.

* X indicates a significant main effect at p <.05 for that leadership variable (row) on that context variable (column).

We found a significant main effect for district size on all eight variables from Round One and all three from Round Two of the teacher surveys (see Table 1.6.2).

In line with this, no significant main effects of location or speaker identity, or interactions of identity, location and speech type were found.

A 2 (framing: loss vs. foregone - gain) × 2 (social norm: no - norm vs. with - norm) ANOVA performed on the data revealed a significant main effect of framing, F (1,1196) = 6.438, p =.011, r =.073, with larger emission cuts in the foregone - gain than the loss condition, a significant main effect of social norm, F (1,1196) = 13.904, p <.001, r =.107, with larger emission cuts in the with - norm than the no - norm condition, together with a significant interaction, F (1,1196) = 4.363, p =.037.

In terms of personality, Swickert et al. (2002) showed a significant main effect of extraversion on stress in undergraduate students and also provided evidence for the unique prediction of stress by extraversion and social support.

In the replication of model 4 predicting adiposity z score at 36 mo, while controlling for adiposity z score at 15 mo, there was no significant main effect of percentage of assertive prompts (β = 0.03; 95 % CI: − 0.30, 0.36) or of maternal intrusiveness (β = − 0.09; 95 % CI: − 0.21, 0.02).

We found a significant main effect of SDNN (F [4, 165] = 3.55, p = 0.008).

There was a significant main effect of the time of negative affect (pretest - posttest), F (1, 40) = 17.69, p < 0.001, Eta2 = 31 (31 %).

There was a significant main effect for Time on the combined dependent variables, Wilks» Lambda = 0.61, F (10, 40) = 2.59, p <.05, partial eta squared =.36, reflecting a general improvement in family dysfunction scores.

Inspecting the pairwise comparisons, no significant main effect of time was found for this variable, but a significant interaction effect emerged, Wilk's Lambda =.41, F (11, 25) = 3.27, p <.05.

There was no significant main effect for CU traits, but a significant interaction was found for Time and CU traits, Wilks» Lambda = 0.54, F = 3.35, p <.01, partial eta squared =.42.