A significant number of amendments focused on the bill's highly qualified teacher provisions, which have flown under the radar in light of more dramatic changes to the legislation's accountability components.
Not exact matches
The key argument is over
amendment 7, tabled by Dominic Grieve, the Conservative former attorney general and backed by a
significant number of Tories, as well as the opposition parties.
Even a very incomplete list gives an impression
of the large
number of significant opinions he has written: seminal administrative law cases such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, the intellectual property case Sony Corp v. Universal City Studios (which made clear that making individual videotapes
of television programs did not constitute copyright infringement), important war on terror precedents such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, important criminal law cases such as Padilla v. Kentucky (holding that defense counsel must inform the defendant if a guilty plea carries a risk
of deportation) and Atkins v. Virginia (which reversed precedent to hold it was unconstitutional to impose capital punishment on the mentally retarded), and
of course Apprendi v. New Jersey (which revolutionized criminal sentencing by holding that the Sixth
Amendment right to jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maximums based on facts other than those decided by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).
This Bill, if passed, would make a
number of significant amendments to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act («PIPEDA «-RRB-.
After a recent review
of Alberta's employment law, the Alberta government tabled Bill 17, Fair and Family - friendly Workplaces Act on May 24, 2017 to make a
number of significant amendments to the Employment Standards Code and Labour Relations Code.
In 2008, a
number of significant amendments to the Ontario Human Rights Code came into effect.
On November 16, 2017, shortly before passing the Bill, the legislature made a
number of significant changes to Bill 148, including adding an
amendment to the Occupational Health and Safety Act (the «OHSA»).
In addition Mr. Nightingale has been co-counsel on a
number of significant cases, including Abebe v. Gonzales, 493 F. 3d 1092 (9th Cir 2007)(finding applicant ineligible for 212 (c) relief for crime
of violence, in the absence
of a corresponding ground
of inadmissibility), in which a petition for rehearing en banc is currently pending; Magana - Pizano v. INS, 200 F. 3d 603 (9th Cir.1999)(establishing eligibility for relief from deportation for those in immigration proceedings before the effective date
of the statutory
amendments eliminating relief, and for those who pled guilty before that date in reliance on being eligible for such relief), and Barahona - Gomez v. Reno, 167 F. 3d 1228 (9th Cir.
Bill C - 29 is the long - awaited government response to the five year mandatory review
of PIPEDA and contains a
number of very
significant amendments that, if passed, will alter the landscape
of privacy law compliance in Canada.
The Court cited a
number of reasons, including that it is not appropriate for an appellate court, twice removed from the parties» initiating motion, to grant this relief; the appellants have not had the opportunity to make full submissions on this new issue; the «irregularity» that State Farm seeks to correct was intentional; the delay in seeking the alternate relief was
significant; the pleadings would be deficient and unable to support an ongoing action by the Trustee without further
amendments; and State Farm is a sophisticated party.
The 2008
amendments made a
number of significant changes to the Queensland land rights Acts, including allowing Registered PBCs to hold the land for the native title holders
of that land.