Sentences with phrase «significant numbers of scientists»

Yet, to see the academy only from this monolithic view would overlook the significant numbers of scientists who do identify with some form of faith tradition (48 percent) as well as those who are interested in spirituality (about 68 percent).»

Last I heard a significant number of scientists are not atheist, if we throw in agnostics that number exceeds 40 %.

The Ministry of Defence is an organisation made up of a large team, including a significant number of scientists and engineers, whose job it is to develop and test a range of new gadgets and technologies to aid national defence services, and help run the nation's military services - including managing budgets and coordinating operations.

Not exact matches

As to your second paragraph, you said; «Now imagine within this land of reality there were significant numbers of engineers, physicians, mathematicians and research scientists with terminal degrees who also embraced this God.

Scientists say the study is significant because of the large number of strains analyzed, including two species of yaws found in isolated inhabitants of Guyana in South America.

While not all of those postdocs are truly unemployed — some are working in non-science jobs — the number of highly trained scientists out of work remains significant.

With an advance that one cryptography expert called a «masterpiece,» University of Texas at Austin computer scientists have developed a new method for producing truly random numbers, a breakthrough that could be used to encrypt data, make electronic voting more secure, conduct statistically significant polls and more accurately simulate complex systems such as Earth's climate.

The findings are significant, scientists say, because liver problems such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease are surging in the U.S., affecting 10 - 35 percent of adults and an increasing number of children.

But new research led by University of Pennsylvania scientists suggests that mutations in an X chromosome gene called TEX11 are responsible for a significant number of cases of infertility — an estimated 1 percent of cases of non-obstructive azoospermia.

The implant allows you to track changes in the level of calcium and notify your carrier.Swiss scientists at ETH Zurich have developed a tattoo that tells its owner about the disease cancer in its early stages.It is known that in a significant number of...

Today, only Africa and Asia still host any significant numbers of large mammal species,» says Dr. Christian Hof, also a scientist at Senckenberg and the study's co-author.

While the general technique — eliminating tumors with focused energy — is not new, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and scientists are combining a number of modern technologies for producing significant breakthroughs in radiation therapy.

Scientists at Harvard University studied a staggering 16 million women and found a significant number of «false positives» - cases where women were wrongly Wondering why your online crush is acting weird?

Bad paradigms survive until a significant number of young scientists displace the paradigm, and replace it with a new one that explains things better.

YFJ: A number of scientists are calling the present age the Anthropocene, the period when we as a species are having a significant — and I think often disastrous — impact on the Earth and its ecosystems.

a significant number of climate scientists acknowledge the hiatus in surface warming, though they feel confident it can be explained; 2.

A failure to appreciate the role clouds play in regulating the Earth's temperature means that a significant number of climate change predictions underestimate the likely extent of global warming over the coming years, scientists have claimed.

Given the Trump Administration's avowed skepticism of climate alarmism, will there be a significant number of skeptical scientists?

· Subject all such information to proper peer review by independent scientists, including the significant numbers of experts who are skeptical of alarmist pollution and climate change claims;

That means that scientists currently lack the ability to predict the impacts of rising sea levels across a number of reef systems, especially reef habitats with significant tidal exposure.

This is clearly evidenced by the significant number of sceptics — both scientists and non-scientists.

Eighth, you don't seem to understand just how significant it is that such a large number of climate scientists (84 %) reaching a consensus that «human - induced warming is occurring.»

«Working with data pertaining to 7450 cardiovascular - related deaths that occurred within Budapest, Hungary, between 1995 and 2004 — where the deceased were «medico - legally autopsied» — Toro et al. looked for potential relationships between daily maximum, minimum and mean temperature, air humidity, air pressure, wind speed, global radiation and daily numbers of the heart - related deaths... scientists report and restate their primary finding numerous times throughout their paper, writing that (1) «both the maximum and the minimum daily temperatures tend to be lower when more death cases occur in a day,» (2) «on the days with four or more death cases, the daily maximum and minimum temperatures tend to be lower than on days without any cardiovascular death events,» (3) «the largest frequency of cardiovascular death cases was detected in cold and cooling weather conditions,» (4) «we found a significant negative relationship between temperature and cardiovascular mortality,» (5) «the analysis of 6 - hour change of air pressure suggests that more acute or chronic vascular death cases occur during increasing air pressure conditions (implying cold weather fronts),» (6) «we found a high frequency of cardiovascular death in cold weather,» (7) «a significant negative relationship was detected between daily maximum [and] minimum temperature [s] and the number of sudden cardiovascular death cases,» and (8) «a significant negative correlation was detected between daily mean temperature and cardiovascular mortality.»

This may be because the kind of analysis I would ideally like to see would probably take a lot of experts a long time to put together: I would like to see analysis of an emissions pathway that at least a majority of scientists would consider prudent (i.e., at a bare minimum avoiding any significant risk of a «Hell on Earth» scenario within the next X number of years - 100?