This report reminds us that it is not only charter schools that may have found ways to avoid serving
significant numbers of special education students.
Not exact matches
At a time when we see
significant numbers of students with disabilities in NYC unable to meet curricular expectations, it is not surprising that the data continues to show considerable delays and deficits in
special education evaluations, IEP meetings, and delivery
of services.
There are a range
of critical issues, such as: the implementation
of the reauthorized ESEA (now called The Every
Student Succeeds Act) which includes new flexibility for states in designing state standards and accountability systems as well as a hard cap on the
number of students with the most
significant cognitive disabilities taking alternate assessments on alternate standards; regulations on disproportionate identification
of minority
students to
special education; and, the goal to transition more disadvantaged
students into college and careers that will have a
significant impact on some
of the most vulnerable children.
The damage done to
significant number of Bridgeport's
special education students and the violation
of federal and state laws that are in place to ensure
special education students get the services they need and deserve, is a direct result
of Paul Vallas» policy
of arrogance and deceit.
The results include
significant improvement in learning outcomes for all
students on statewide assessments, as well as a 40 % reduction in the
number of students referred for initial placement in
special education and a 50 % reduction in the
number of students identified as having a learning disability.
In recent years, Excel Academy has seen a
significant increase in the
number of students attending our schools who require
special education services based on what is outlined in their IEPs or 504 plans, including those requiring sub-separate learning environments.
These
education reformers really seem to believe that the problem facing urban schools is not primarily the level
of poverty, language barriers or the
significant number of students who require
special education services, but the «quality»
of the teachers.