Not exact matches
The key points of the paper are that: i) model simulations with 20th century forcings are able to match the surface air temperature record, ii) they also match the measured
changes of ocean heat content over the last decade, iii) the implied
planetary imbalance (the amount of excess energy the Earth is currently absorbing) which is roughly equal to the ocean heat uptake, is
significant and growing, and iv) this implies both that there is
significant heating «in the pipeline», and that there is an important lag in the climate's full response to
changes in the forcing.
However, even a smaller figure (I had calculated about 0.17 W / m ^ 2 based on your inflated figure for total
planetary albedo, but you can check it out) is still
significant when compared with the total flux imbalance, which I think is a more informative comparison than an arbitrarily selected
change in cloud cover, because it compares the sea ice reduction with the effects of all climate variations that have been operating in recent years..
In combination, these two research efforts add to the massive amount of scientific evidence that climate
change is always occurring; and, most definitely does not require human consumer / industrial greenhouse gases to produce
significant impacts on
planetary environments and those associated civilizations.
Humans have been
changing Earth's landscapes at globally
significant levels for at least 3000 years, and doing so by increasingly productive and efficient means, according to our new research challenging the claim that use of land by industrial civilization is destroying
planetary ecology at an accelerating pace.