Sentences with phrase «significant points of the article»

In short, he dismisses it without any significant comment.Now, I generally appreciate most of what Cramer and Fuchs write, but in this case, they didn't seem to get the most significant points of the article (2 and 3 as I number them).

Not exact matches

Thornton's vision both of the Trinity and of the relation of the three divine persons to creation is closely akin to my own hypothesis, as will be evident later in this article, There are, however, significant points of difference between the two theories.

The Post noted an interesting point in an article that also has a lot of details about election - eve operations — because of the time required to set up a significant turnout effort, the Republicans haven't had time to roll one out in congressional districts that have suddenly become vulnerable in the last few weeks.

Of course there are significant differences between 200 and 1100 T. I point that out in the article (bottom of low and top of high = big differencesOf course there are significant differences between 200 and 1100 T. I point that out in the article (bottom of low and top of high = big differencesof low and top of high = big differencesof high = big differences).

Within the context of this article, a «significant improvement» would be an increase of 50 points or more.

As you'll see in this article, the performance of the SMI strategies, properly combined, has been such that any marginal benefit gained from timing isn't worth the significant emotional toll, not to mention the high probability that a person will make some mistakes identifying appropriate exit and re-entry points.

The interesting thing is to see that a.) None provide any credentials proving their methods are better; b.) they don't like the tone of the article — then again, a lot of people, when all they do is talk among those who only agree with them get offended when they run across someone that isn't in lock step with them; c.) they try to attack me personally, as a «hater», which is totally unfair and judgmental about someone whom they have never met; d.) can't point to any specific dogs with significant accomplishments that have been clicker trained — hunting, police, obedience, tracking, etc... and just finding a specimen or two isn't very convincing evidence... get enough dogs and sometimes you'll find the genius dog that almost trains itself; e.) there is no point by point refutation of what I've said, supported by third party evidence.

From the article: Glenn Schleede, an energy analysts points out that those pushing more tax dollars for energy R&D need to consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsidies).

read the article, interesting points but still neglects the wider impact of the Midievel Warming Period and focuses purely on grape growing as opposed to the written accounts from people in England and France that the surge in production was due to the significant increase in temperature.

The two post AR4 references are clearly delineated as such in the article and are offered to support the point that the putative source for the AR4's assertion of statistically insignificant growth in Antarctic sea ice extent, in his subsequent work which showed statistically significant growth, offered no indication that this was break from what he had done in the past.

Article on latest World Bank findings (pointing out that the North Dakota is now a significant location of natural gas flaring as a result of development of the Bakken Shale for oil):

A version of our article that had been checked with Dr Lewis underwent significant late editing and so did not give a fair or accurate account of his views on these points.

Which is a «significant portion», but not materially different from the demographics of new calls as a whole that I reported earlier, which seems to fatally undermine you point (though, I'll be the first to admit the LSUC data has a serious defect in it — it doesn't include 600 odd students who started their articles after August 6 — almost 30 % of all articling students.

The respective debates around articling and LAO unionization will certainly feature prominently in any submissions made on these points, and it is possible that any changes to these areas will have significant impacts on the job stability and employment prospects of lawyers in Ontario.