Not exact matches
The reduced DMS
emissions induce a
significant positive
radiative forcing of which 83 % (0.4 W / m2) can, in the model, be attributed to the impact of ocean acidification alone.
In the tugging on the temperature profile (by net radiant heating / cooling resulting from
radiative disequilibrium at single wavelengths) by the absorption (and
emission) by different bands, the larger - scale aspects of the temperature profile will tend to be shaped more by the bands with moderate amounts of absorption, while finer - scale variations will be more influenced by bands with larger optical thicknesses per unit distance (where there can be
significant emission and absorption by a thinner layer).
wilt, the paper you cite describes what in their view is a «small but statistically
significant effect of cosmic rays on cloud formation, which in no way invalidates the large and
significant effects of human
emissions on the current anthropogenic
radiative forcing budget of the atmosphere.
But equally there are things that could be done about black and tropospheric ozone, population, agriculture and ecosystems — all of those things I mentioned above that would have
significant effects in limiting the multiple
radiative forcings from anthropogenic greenhouse
emissions.