Using the New Karl, or better described as the ERSST v4, temperature series does indeed make the hiatus go away but not
the significant slowdown in warming from the period 1976 - 1999 to the period 2000 - 2014.
There was a significant period of warming during the last 20 years of the 20th century, followed by
a significant slowdown in warming during the 21st.
Not exact matches
In regards to your question, if you mean how robust is the «slowdown» in global surface warming, the answer is it just probably just barely statistically significan
In regards to your question, if you mean how robust is the «
slowdown»
in global surface warming, the answer is it just probably just barely statistically significan
in global surface
warming, the answer is it just probably just barely statistically
significant.
Whenever I point out that there is also no statistically
significant slowdown in the rate of global
warming they put on a playing dumb act.
Although the global temperature data show short periods of greater and smaller
warming trends, and even short periods of cooling, the team's key question was whether or not these are statistically
significant in showing a change
in the form of a
slowdown or acceleration of global
warming, or whether they are merely expected fluctuations — or noise —
in the data.
The updated data shows a statistically
significant global
warming trend over the 1998 - 2012 period and the authors note that their results «do not support the notion of a «
slowdown»
in the increase of global surface temperature.»
The ball is
in your court, demonstrate that there is statistically
significant evidence for a
slowdown in warming if you can.