Not exact matches
As
significant uncertainties about the
thickness of the surface
ice still exist, some planetary scientists have identified two possible mechanisms for how possible volcanic heat can escape to the surface from Europa's rocky mantle and be carried upward by buoyant oceanic currents.
To establish this uncertainty in the
ice - volume record (Schweiger et al. 2011), we spent a
significant effort drawing on most types
of available observations
of ice thickness thanks to a convenient compilation
of ice thickness data (Lindsay, 2010).
Still more striking, and
significant, has been a severe decline in the average
thickness of the
ice pack, and thus
of its volume (graph).
A loss
of 4.2 meters
of ice thickness on glaciers with an estimated mean
thickness of 30 - 50 meters (Post et al., 1971) is
significant.
Well they are predicting 2C tonight in Central South America (Tropics - subtropics) as I have said many times on this site, I believe that the highly
significant constant increase in antarctica
ice extent and
thickness may begin to affect the reach
of polar air into the southern latitudes if it happens to be directed in the right direction making it go farther north than usual.
Examination
of records
of fast
ice thickness (1936 — 2000) and
ice extent (1900 — 2000) in the Kara, Laptev, East Siberian, and Chukchi Seas provide evidence that long - term
ice thickness and extent trends are small and generally not statistically
significant, while trends for shorter records are not indicative
of the long - term tendencies due to large - amplitude low - frequency variability.
This is on top
of very
significant drops in average
ice thickness.
The model simulation does not contain assimilated
ice thickness data and shows
significant differences in particular in the region north
of Greenland.