Sentences with phrase «significant waves not»

Not exact matches

If we don't observe a significant second - wave of credit strains this year, I am comfortable with our standard post-war criteria to address any residual risks.

It could be commercial real estate, inflation, a war, a sovereign default (e.g., Greece, Japan, UK, Italy), another wave of corporate defaults, or, a very weak economy, with banks that are willing to clip spreads, but not take any significant financing risks.

Despite various flourishes around the place (the UK impact of the Pensacola Revival or the ministry of Todd Bentley) there arguably hasn't been any sustained significant «move» of the Spirit in the UK since those third and fourth waves in the 80s and 90s.

The most significant technology, in cultural terms, turns out to be not the steam turbine, or X-rays, or radio waves.

«Based on comparing the current economy to past recession episodes, we once again conclude that real estate weakness will remain a significant drag on the economy, leaving us treading water in 2008 but not slipping under the waves into recession,» cites the Bruin forecast.

Rudd's fall and Javid's elevation has further damaged the gender balance of May's cabinet, however, although in the context of the scandal that led to this change that is probably not going to make significant waves.

Not surprisingly, even healthy individuals show significant changes in brain wave activity during brief exposures to olfactory stimuli that are actually below the sensory threshold and not even consciously perceivNot surprisingly, even healthy individuals show significant changes in brain wave activity during brief exposures to olfactory stimuli that are actually below the sensory threshold and not even consciously perceivnot even consciously perceived.

Fact # 1: Carbon Dioxide is a Heat - Trapping Gas Fact # 2: We Are Adding More Carbon Dioxide to the Atmosphere All the Time Fact # 3: Temperatures are Rising Fact # 4: Sea Level is Rising Fact # 5: Climate Change Can be Natural, but What's Happening Now Can't be Explained by Natural Forces Fact # 6: The Terms «Global Warming» and «Climate Change» Are Almost Interchangeable Fact # 7: We Can Already See The Effects of Climate Change Fact # 8: Large Regions of The World Are Seeing a Significant Increase In Extreme Weather Events, Including Torrential Rainstorms, Heat Waves And Droughts Fact # 9: Frost and Snowstorms Will Still Happen in a Warmer World Fact # 10: Global Warming is a Long - Term Trend; It Doesn't Mean Next Year Will Always Be Warmer Than This Year

Furthermore, the groundbreaking detection wouldn't have been possible without a significant overhaul of the LIGO detectors, which first hunted for gravitational waves between 2002 and 2010.

In the world of the very small, where particle and wave aspects of reality are equally significant, things do not behave in any way that we can understand from our experience of the everyday world... all pictures are false, and there is no physical analogy we can make to understand what goes on inside atoms.

Amazon has denied it, but something like a $ 99 Kindle Fire could make waves too, even if that doesn't involve any significant new hardware or software solutions.

On the contrary, roughly 80 percent of HOT is devoted to on - the - ground reporting that focuses on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise limiting global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative of preparing our societies for the many significant climate impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are now unavoidable over the years ahead.

If the «pause» continues into the 2030s, as predicted by Wyatt / Curry, then the «stadium wave» hypothesis has been corroborated as a plausible explanation for (at least) a significant portion of the past warming and current slight cooling — and, while not falsifying AGW itself, it will most likely have falsified the IPCC hypothesis of CAGW (as outlined specifically in its AR4 and AR5 reports).

Despite the fact that an average of models may or may not be physically realistic, the fact that their average and error bars all run so much higher than observation, and are so statistically significant, should not be overlooked with a hand wave.

Significant investments may be required to ensure that power generation keeps up with rising demand associated with rising temperatures.38, 39 Finally, vulnerability to heat waves is not evenly distributed throughout urban areas; outdoor versus indoor air temperatures, air quality, baseline health, and access to air conditioning are all dependent on socioeconomic factors.29 Socioeconomic factors that tend to increase vulnerability to such hazards include race and ethnicity (being a minority), age (the elderly and children), gender (female), socioeconomic status (low income, status, or poverty), and education (low educational attainment).

Summary of how they got to this finding: They use CMIP models which, if not outright flawed, have not proved their validity in estimated temperature levels in the 2030 to 2070 timeframe, are used as the basis for extrapolations that assert the creation of more and more 3 - sigma «extreme events» of hot weather; this is despite the statistical contradiction and weak support for predicting significant increases in outlier events based on mean increases; then, based on statistical correlations between mortality and extreme heat events (ie heat waves), temperature warming trends are conjured into an enlargement of the risks from heat events; risks increase significantly only by ignoring obvious adjustments and mitigations any reasonable community or person would make to adapt to warmer weather.

I was thinking about the potential value of wave heights as proxy for temps, not the energy stored — is it really possible that that's significant relative to the thermal energy?

Fact # 1: Carbon Dioxide is a Heat - Trapping Gas Fact # 2: We Are Adding More Carbon Dioxide to the Atmosphere All the Time Fact # 3: Temperatures are Rising Fact # 4: Sea Level is Rising Fact # 5: Climate Change Can be Natural, but What's Happening Now Can't be Explained by Natural Forces Fact # 6: The Terms «Global Warming» and «Climate Change» Are Almost Interchangeable Fact # 7: We Can Already See The Effects of Climate Change Fact # 8: Large Regions of The World Are Seeing a Significant Increase In Extreme Weather Events, Including Torrential Rainstorms, Heat Waves And Droughts Fact # 9: Frost and Snowstorms Will Still Happen in a Warmer World Fact # 10: Global Warming is a Long - Term Trend; It Doesn't Mean Next Year Will Always Be Warmer Than This Year

If cities do not start acting now, many of the world's vulnerable cities and populations will endure significant impacts from heat waves, heavy downpours and coastal flooding due to sea level rise.

For Waves, this collaboration represents a big expansion into a significant global market and the implementation of blockchain as a core part of a business's strategy — whether or not this involves a token sale.

Meanwhile, for Waves, this represents a big push into a significant global market, and into the exciting new phenomenon of tokenization — the implementation of blockchain as a core part of a business's strategy (whether or not this involves a token sale).

Contrary to our hypothesis, the indirect effect of wave 1 movie reckless driving on wave 6 reckless driving through wave 4 sensation seeking was not significant (β =.004, p =.171).

When these demographic variables were not included, only two of the 14 outcomes variables were statistically significant (at p < 0.05): children's physical health was better in comparison sites than in CfC sites, and the reverse was true for maternal mental health at wave 1.

Contrary to our hypothesis, the wave 1 movie reckless driving effect on wave 4 sensation seeking was not significant (β =.03, NS.).

As hypothesized, wave 1 self - regulation had a significant negative impact on inattentive driving (β = −.145, p =.002) but a non-significant negative impact on reckless driving (β = −.052, p =.163) and the difference in effects was marginally significant (χ2 (1) = 3.64, N = 1630, p =.056).

Consistent with previous research, 35 but not a focus of this work, we found that the number of movies per week was a significant predictor of wave 4 sensation seeking (β =.06, p =.005).

However, time spent on violent games in wave 1 showed a significant causal - correlational effect on physical aggression in wave 2 (β =.09, B =.01, SE =.003, p <.01), but physical aggression in wave 1 did not have a causal - correlational effect on violent game play in wave 2 (β =.06, B =.63, SE =.411, p =.12).

Next, we performed multi-group analysis (Jaccard and Wan 1996) to the model presented in Fig. 2, in order to test whether observed differences in the structural weights for the path between pathological gaming wave 1 and physical aggression wave 2 were statistically significant between players of mostly violent games (N = 215) and players of mostly non-violent games (N = 287).

When we included both age and wave in the model, age was significant and wave of assessment was not.