The emission factors vary
significantly by coal rank, confirming a long - recognized finding, and also within each rank by State of origin.
Not exact matches
Under this scenario,
by 2040 global energy demand will be
significantly larger than it is now; oil,
coal, and natural gas each will account for about one - quarter of total demand, and solar and wind together will account for roughly 5 %.
New Chinese hydro, nuclear, wind and solar are also
significantly curtailing
coal power generation, driven not only
by energy security and climate concerns but also
by efforts to reduce local pollution.
Most electricity in the United States is generated at power plants that run on
coal and natural gas — fossil fuels that contribute
significantly to global warming
by emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide.
Cheap shale gas is
significantly reducing
coal demand in the United States, but global
coal consumption is still expected to rise 2.6 percent annually
by 2017, the International Energy Agency said today in a report.
Although fracking in the U.S. produces more than 100 billion gallons of wastewater per year, the process requires
significantly less water per unit of energy than extraction and processing for
coal and nuclear power, according to past research
by Jackson and his colleagues.
Because U.S.
coal production peaked in 2002 (in terms of energy provided
by coal), the U.S. will experience
significantly higher
coal and electric prices in future years.
If the U.K. sold its shale gas both domestically and abroad to replace
coal, it could reduce local air pollution
significantly and reduce global carbon emissions
by 170 megatons.
3 — Of course, that just
by itself would not have been a significant incentive, so the original wind development lobbyists then made the case for a quantum leap: that
by adding wind turbines to the grid we could
significantly reduce CO2 from those «dirty» fossil fuel electrical sources (especially
coal).
The revised plan
significantly reduced the number of
coal plants in the pipeline and incorporated Nguy Thi's recommendation to increase renewable energy — such as wind, solar, and biomass — to 21 % of the total energy plan
by 2030.
After accounting for all the methane leakage factors mentioned
by the Post, the NETL study clearly demonstrates that life cycle GHG emissions from LNG exports from the U.S. are
significantly less than emissions from
coal generated electricity in China and in Europe.
China has shown the world how much it truly cares about global warming
by burning
significantly more dirty, carbon - unfriendly
coal than it previously pretended.
«PV Costs Set to Plunge for 2009/10,» Renewable Energy World, 23 December 2008; «PV Costs Down
Significantly from 1998 — 2007,» Renewable Energy World, 23 February 2009; Christoph Podewils, «As Cheap as Brown
Coal:
By 2010, a kWh of PV Electricity in Spain Will Cost Around 9 cents to Produce,» PHOTON International, April 2007.
Electricity production from
coal in the United States has dropped
significantly, replaced
by increased generation from natural gas and wind power.
Ending the production of
coal, oil and natural gas from public lands and waters could
significantly reduce CO2 emissions
by the US, according to a new study.
The «standards
significantly underestimate the carbon - reduction contributions
by energy efficiency, solar and wind power as clean replacements for dirty, retiring
coal plants.»
I lived in Wyoming for 8 years and it breaks my heart that the state's landscape is being so
significantly altered
by the oil,
coal and gas industry.
Both yield a phase - out of
coal by 2030, but the date each specific plant goes offline differs
significantly between the two approaches, with different potential impacts on regions within a given country.