Sentences with phrase «significantly less warming»

Significantly less warming in Antarctica than the global average, and most of the warming concentrated to the Westernmost part.

Not exact matches

Both spheres may be somewhat warmer than Kepler's two previous premier rocky worlds, Kepler 186 f and Kepler 62 f, each of which gets significantly less starlight — similar to that received by Mars.

Because failure to significantly curb these planet - warming gases will truly transform our world in less than 100 years.

If the worms were kept at 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit), the array of transgenes was less active, creating only a small amount of fluorescent protein, but when they were exposed to a warmer temperature of 25 degrees Celsius (77 degrees Fahrenheit), the activity of the transgenes was significantly increased.

Men's whole profiles were seen as significantly more attractive when their photos were rated as being more genuine and trustworthy and, somewhat surprisingly, relatively less warm and kind.

This filter highlights the the fact that the series (which is an 11 year running average) has a significant recent warming uptick, and that During the same time this uptick occurred, variability was significantly less than normal when compare with the rest of the series.

The actual prevailing view of the paleoclimate research community that emerged during the early 1990s, when long - term proxy data became more widely available and it was possible to synthesize them into estimates of large - scale temperature changes in past centuries, was that the average temperature over the Northern Hemisphere varied by significantly less than 1 degree C in previous centuries (i.e., the variations in past centuries were small compared to the observed 20th century warming).

During the so - called Holocene Climate Optimum, from approximately 8000 to 5000 years ago, when the temperatures were somewhat warmer than today, there was significantly less sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, probably less than 50 % of the summer 2007 coverage, which is absolutely lowest on record.

If there is any suggestion that our present warm climate would be significantly less sensitive than glacial and transition times (rather than there simply being a gap in our knowledge there), I'd sure like to know it.

I just explained, a present condition of a significantly lesser solar input giving a warmer (more than ten days) climate.

There is less than a month of melting left, and it is almost impossible for this year to melt as much as last year, however, with some warm weather recently the race tightened significantly.

[T] he warming since 1998 is not significantly less than the long - term warming.

Why should warming during the current Holocene Interglacial be significantly different / less than during the previous Eemian Interglacial (MIS5e), when sea levels were, per the IPCC's own comments, above modern levels or for that matter above the purported mid-Holocene highstand?

Fyfe and colleagues (2013) find that the observed warming over the periods 1993 - 2012 and 1998 - 2012 is significantly less than the warming in climate model simulations, but that the same models successfully simulate the rate of warming over the 1900 - 2012 period.

Now this is significantly less than the IPCC and any sort of gung ho global warmer claims for the near - TSR forcing level.

The fact that a majority of Americans don't believe global warming will pose a threat to them in their lifetimes makes it perhaps less surprising to find that significantly less than a majority of Americans say they worry a great deal about it.

Temperatures have been significantly warmer in the past, even with the +2 C or so from the Eemian, much less the 8 to 10 C from coral evolutionary history:

These methods have been significantly improved by fully coupling the hydrologic cycle among land, lake, and atmosphere.94, 95 Without accounting for that cycle of interactions, a study96 concluded that increases in precipitation would be negated by increases in winter evaporation from less ice cover and by increases in summer evaporation and evapotranspiration from warmer air temperatures, under a scenario of continued increases in global emissions (SRES A2 scenario).

For every degree of warming, more of the world will have significantly less water available.

Florida is another warm - weather coastal state that's already more densely populated than California, yet it's adding more homes on a per capita basis than California despite having a significantly less vibrant economy.

Considering Californians drive some 320 billion miles every year, these standards help ensure significantly less pollution, fewer global warming emissions, and fuel savings at the pump — and they're already working.

Given that «causes of the earlier warming are less clear ``, our understanding of Earth's climate system is rudimentary at best, and our historical record is laughably brief, it is confounding how the IPCC can be so «extremely» sure «that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century», which is «not statistically significantly different» from the natural warming that occurred between 1910 — 1940.

The pre-Holocene climate shifts seem to be well accounted for by dynamics of glacial meltoff, freshwater discharge, and the impact on the ocean circulation... all of which is less of an issue in an initially warm climate, and the AR5 generation models give no indication that the overturning circulation will be significantly impacted over the coming century.

What counts here is it looks like the warming has been significantly over-estimated, Paper after paper is coming out with the same general conclusion, that climate sensitivity is looking much less dire.

According to Ridley and Peiser, world temperatures had gone up «less than half as fast as the scientific consensus predicted in 1990 when the global - warming scare began in earnest» and «the planet was significantly warmer than today several times during the past 10,000 years.»

Likewise, though less warming occurred overall in 2009 compared to 2004, the mean maximum DHW in 2009 was significantly higher at Abaiang and North Tarawa (mean of all sites 13.8 °C · week) than at Butaritari (mean 7.1 °C · week)(p < 0.01, t - test).

But a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the projections of climate change that have been made by the current family of computerized climate models has been overdone — that the world will warm up significantly less than has been predicted as a result of our ongoing carbon dioxide emissions.

The nations of the world agreed in Paris last December to try to reduce emissions and hold global warming to significantly less than 2 °C altogether, but there is evidence that national plans tabled so far may not be enough.

Given the 20 °C warming we find with 4.8 × CO2, it is clear that such a climate forcing would produce intolerable climatic conditions even if the true climate sensitivity is significantly less than the Russell sensitivity, or, if the Russell sensitivity is accurate, the CO2 amount required to produce intolerable conditions for humans is less than 4.8 × CO2.

Over deep warm waters (right), hurricanes have the potential to be more powerful because the ocean surface cooling is significantly less.

This is likely one reason that the satellite and ocean heat data show significantly less global warming in recent years than does the surface temperature data.

· The blue circles show the 10 year warming rates which are statistically significantly less than the average warming rate — these are called Slowdowns.

The 1868 heatwave is described in no less apocalyptic terms than any of the others; so none of the other anecdotal accounts give us any reason to think that those heatwaves were significantly warmer than that of 1868.

Presumably if the deep ocean warms significantly, that could eventually reduce the level of surface cooling due to upwelling, since there would be less overall temperature change between the deep and the surface.

In the long term, those participating children are more likely to be employed and less likely to be dependent on government assistance.9 The positive effects are larger, and more likely to be sustained, when programs are high quality.10 In addition, the impact is greatest for children from low - income families.11 Differences in children's cognitive abilities by income are evident at only nine months old and significantly widen by the time children are two years old.12 Children living in poverty are more likely to be subject to stressful home environments — which can have lifelong impacts on learning, cognition, and self - regulation — while parents living in poverty have limited resources to provide for their families and high barriers to accessing affordable, high - quality child care.13 High - quality early learning programs staffed by warm and responsive adults can help mitigate these effects, offering a safe and predictable learning environment that fosters children's development.14