Sentences with phrase «significantly more charter»

Not exact matches

In part due to fights over charter schools, unions have spent significantly more helping Democrats than Republicans in the past couple of Senate elections, the largest partisan battleground in the state, but as recently as 2012, the reverse was true.

A new study suggests that charter school students are more likely to do well at college and earn significantly more than their counterparts at other schools.

In both cities, students with existing IEPs are significantly and substantially more likely to remain in their kindergarten school if it is a charter than if it is a district school.

In a 2015 report, Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) found that the average charter - school student in the Bay Area attained significantly more growth in reading and math than similar students in nearby district schools — and that this difference increased the longer he or she stayed in a charter school.

More significantly, Ginsburg ignores the fact that the D.C. NAEP sample in 2009 did not include students attending charter schools not authorized by the district, while in 2007 all charter school students were included.

Detroit's charter schools significantly outperform Detroit's district school sector even when selective - admissions magnet schools are included, and even more significantly when they are excluded.

Students in district schools with three or more charter schools within a one - mile radius perform significantly better in math than students with just one charter in the neighborhood, and they are also significantly less likely to be retained.

And on the specific claim the article makes that «half the charters perform only as well, or worse than, Detroit's traditional public schools» this is what the Stanford study has to say: «In reading, 47 percent of charter schools perform significantly better than their traditional public school market, which is more positive than the 35 % for Michigan charter schools as a whole.

But charters, which get significantly less funding than traditional district schools, are able to direct more funding into classrooms.

But a DOE spokeswoman said public schools still enroll significantly more challenged kids than charters.

But in their mid-20s, no - excuses charter attendees were not more likely to be employed or to earn more than non-charter students, and students in regular charters actually earned significantly less than otherwise would be expected.

More precisely, Noble students enter high school with slightly lower test performance than the average public school student, though significantly higher than the average student at a Chicago charter school.

GCI also found that charter schools paid teachers on average 20 % less than public school districts while paying administrators significantly more (about 50 % greater than their counterparts in similar - sized public school districts).

«Although more families have been choosing charter schools in Arizona, funding for charter school students has gone down significantly over the past five years — deeply impacting many of the highest - performing schools in our state,» added Sigmund.

But more significantly, every family is now empowered to choose the public school that will serve them best (district, charter or magnet) through a centralized, equitable and politically neutral system called Newark Enrolls.

The study of charter schools in 15 states and the District of Columbia found that, nationally, only 17 % of charter schools do better academically than their traditional counterparts, and more than a third «deliver learning results that are significantly worse than their student [s] would have realized had they remained in traditional public schools.»

Charter schools in California that have been around for five years or more, like many of San Diego's thriving schools, are significantly outperforming California's broader public school system.

Data show that privately run charter schools serve significantly fewer students with special needs, English language learners and more difficult to educate students.

Almost every high - performing charter network in the country, from KIPP to Achievement First, uses significantly more scheduled time to achieve impressive academic gains, and many public schools, spurred by local initiatives, innovative state policies and federal leadership, are also adopting this promising practice.

Students in the country's largest network of charter schools are learning significantly more than they otherwise would, according to a new report.

Data show that privately run charter and voucher schools serve significantly fewer students with special needs, English language learners and more difficult to educate students.

-- California charter public schools grew significantly this 2011 - 12 school year, opening at high numbers statewide, and serving more students and families in both urban and rural areas, according to data released by the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA)charter public schools grew significantly this 2011 - 12 school year, opening at high numbers statewide, and serving more students and families in both urban and rural areas, according to data released by the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA)Charter Schools Association (CCSA) today.

While the report recognized a robust national demand for more charter schools from parents and local communities, it found that 17 percent of charter schools reported academic gains that were significantly better than traditional public schools, while 37 percent of charter schools showed gains that were worse than their traditional public school counterparts, with 46 percent of charter schools demonstrating no significant difference.

Christie has proposed his own charter revisions that would add significantly more flexibility to charter schools, while his education commissioner, Chris Cerf, has lately been touting greater accountability for enrollment and performance.

However, as states began enacting legislation to create and spread charter schools — beginning with Minnesota in 1991, then ramping up significantly under the presidential administration of Bill Clinton — there was a «more conservative vision» repeated again and again that reinforced charter schools as «competitors» to the public school system — even to the extent of replacing public schools, some argued.

Charter school students scored significantly better than their district school counterparts, but had more native - English speakers and fewer kids with disabilities.

Apparently Governor Malloy's new plan not only over looks these existing taxpayer - funded subsidies but he is calling for significantly more money to be given to Achievement First and other charter schools.

«However, it is made significantly more difficult when states must meet prescriptive requirements — in this case a de facto requirement for charter school legislation — to even compete for available funding.»

After significantly cutting charter funding in FY 2010, funding for charter schools represents a move toward more equitably funding students in all schools — traditional district and charter alike.

The gap grows significantly between kindergarten and fifth grade: 46 % of the growth occurs because charter schools are less likely to classify students as special education, and more likely to declassify them; 54 % is due to the number of new general education students enrolling in charter schools, not from the number of students with special needs going down.

Almost 20 percent of the charters saw significantly more gain in reading than typical public schools in the state.

Gardner joined other parents and a vocal group of educators before the Wisconsin Assembly Education Committee in January to speak out against AB1, a bill proposed by state lawmakers that would give significantly more funding to charter schools and green light voucher expansion.

Students enrolled in urban charter schools in New Jersey learn significantly more in both math and reading compared to their traditional public school peers.

The final way the Charter has significantly affected the Court is less tangible and more abstract, but at the same time, very apparent and real.