Sentences with phrase «significantly warming the planet»

So although nuclear fusion could in theory provide an effectively unlimited source of energy, if our energy demand keeps growing we will not be able to use it freely without significantly warming the planet.

Nowhere in observations, experiment or theory can you find any flaw in the notion that putting long - lived greenhouse gases into the atmosphere will significantly warm the planet's surface and alter the climate.

Not exact matches

But reducing emissions of short - lived substances that help heat the planet «could significantly reduce the rate of warming over the next few decades.»

Because failure to significantly curb these planet - warming gases will truly transform our world in less than 100 years.

«Forest management on all lands can contribute significantly toward cooling a warming planet,» U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a statement.

A complete failure of the agreement at this point, with business - as - usual growth for another decade, would almost certainly commit the planet to significantly more warming than the Paris goals, and the human consequences of this would be catastrophic.

For instance, the team used a numerical model to see how phytoplankton as a whole will migrate significantly, with most populations shifting toward the poles as the planet warms.

The Arctic is warming significantly faster than the rest of the planet.

The likes of Tom Harris, better known for his lobbying work on behalf of the Canadian energy industry, and Fred Singer, formally a tobacco company expert - for - hire, are trying to make headlines again claiming that the warming of our planet has significantly slowed down.

William: Yes, however, there are sets of other observations that logically supports the assertion that the majority of the warming in the last 150 years was due to solar magnetic cycle changes rather than the increase in atmospheric CO2 and that the planet is about to significantly cool due to the current solar magnetic cycle change.

A new study published in the Nature Geosciences journal this week by largely UK - based climate scientists has led to claims in the media that climate models are «wrong» and have significantly overestimated the observed warming of the planet.

Since for a while now emissions have been barrelling along and nothing's happened significantly global - warming wise (but the planet is happily greening), I imagine they're reluctant draw attention to that.

Even if the planet fails to warm significantly carbon taxing has to be good if we are paying to help the planet?..

been reduced significantly (enough for the heating to slow down and prevent boiling), what we have is a warming planet.

Even if regulations like those in the Paris Climate Treaty could somehow significantly reduce global warming, they could hurt people and the planet.

The existence of the greenhouse effect, the increase in CO2 (and other GHGs) over the last hundred years and its human cause, and the fact the planet warmed significantly over the 20th Century are not much in doubt.»

According to Ridley and Peiser, world temperatures had gone up «less than half as fast as the scientific consensus predicted in 1990 when the global - warming scare began in earnest» and «the planet was significantly warmer than today several times during the past 10,000 years.»

You say its probable that pesky humans are caising the planet to significantly warm.

If the sun's energy significantly increased, we would expect most or all of the planets to warm up.

Fyfe says that his calculations show that the planet warmed at 0.170 °C per decade from 1972 to 2001, which is significantly higher than the warming of 0.113 °C per decade he calculates for 2000 — 14.

For, despite large natural variations within the 2000s, the decade as a whole was significantly warmer than the 1990s, especially in the series that the Planet Gore / Icecap chart did not show.