One could make
similar arguments about gold coins or diamonds having a special allure for criminals trying to move their money out of the law's reach.
He's been riding this horse for quite a while and has published at least 2 or 3 papers making the argument now, in addition to papers making
similar arguments about model evaluation.
One might make
similar arguments about the photographs of Louise Lawler, a contemporary of Levine's, whose practice, beginning in the late 1970s, has kept a close watch on the social lives of artworks, catching them both in corporate offices and collector's homes.
Other scholars made
similar arguments about the negative consequences of teaching to the test.
He makes
similar arguments about how efforts to improve teacher quality, instructional approaches like Success for All, and high - expectation techniques practiced by educators like Jaime Escalante and Rafe Esquith are not promising models for reform because their success is due to the selection of students or other factors that can not be replicated on a broader scale.
He makes
similar arguments about other areas of supplementation, such as vitamin D and iodine.
The move also drew opposition from Democratic politicians at the state and federal level, who made
similar arguments about the impact on the census, which is also used for the once - in - a-decade process of drawing new districts for the U.S. House of Representatives.
Bassett's made
a similar argument about de Blasio's pre-K program.
You might make
a similar argument about low cholesterol.
It sounds to me like
a similar argument about 30 fps.
My old Giant Bomb defense of Invisible, Inc. was grounded in
a similar argument about how it solves a classic dilemma of the roguelike
Some would make
a similar argument about other existing colleges though.
Eduardo Porter wrote a column in The New York Times headlined Nudges Aren't Enough for Problems Like Retirement Savings where he makes
a similar argument about so - called «nudges,» which encourage positive behavior by individuals but don't get to the root causes of problems and, if we're not careful, have the possibility of making things even worse.
Not exact matches
Vik writes: The ongoing
argument about this being the new internet to the grandest pyramid scheme is perplexing and
similar to the current debate between Elon vs. Zuck on AI.
Critics have argued that Twitter only allows such behavior because it is desperate for engagement and user growth, which is
similar to the
argument for why Facebook doesn't care
about fake news.
A
similar pattern can be seen in responses the question
about which province's
argument is more persuasive.
It's also
similar to an
argument I made
about trying not to put God in a box: pushing that sentiment to the extreme can be a form of putting God in a box labeled «not the box.»
Similar arguments could be made
about the JEDP theory.
7Using a
similar kind of
argument Bernard Loomer argued that what is distinctive
about process thought is not its substitution of «process» for «being,» for if this were it, then «in many respects we really would not need process thought to get on with things.»
I could preach
about how there is a separation of church and state but i would like to believe that goes without saying... instead i shall present an
argument that looks at the belief systems that arose before jesus and preached
similar messages.
It has been said that the Ugandan government was influenced by evangelical Christians from the U.S., and indeed Museveni's
argument that gay and lesbian people are «disgusting» has been echoed by Thabiti Anyabwile of the Gospel Coalition, who has spoken positively
about similar legislation in Liberia and Russia.
it seems like
about ten years ago, i made a
similar argument concerning robin van persie.
A
similar argument broke out when Danielle wanted to invest more of her time in the cycle studio, but Adam was worried
about daycare costs.
They are
about pooling risk and benefits, in a
similar way to how early 20th Century left - wing
arguments envisioned that process at the level of citizenship.
Last month, former Prime Minister Tony Blair made a
similar argument: «this is a question
about whether we leave Europe, not whether we join Europe», he said on the Andrew Marr show.
A
similar Sir Humphrey
argument might be used
about Labour's 3p fuel duty rise, which is planned for January 2013.
Similar arguments have been used by intelligence agencies
about terror suspects, triggering the creation of secret court hearings in the first place.
Similar arguments apply to Ombudsman reports which are often
about individual injustices, but occasionally have implications for matters of important national concern.
«These survey findings show the American public is closely split in their views
about the protesters» goals — a sizeable share of the public is aligned with the protesters»
arguments but a roughly
similar share are either opposed to the goals of the protesters or have yet to be convinced.»
PlantPositive do not specifically talk
about Dr Mercola claims, but Paleo's
arguments about cholesterol and other issues that in some ways are
similar (Dr Mercola is a cholesterol denialist just as Paleo).
It's a fine, if simple,
argument that James Solomon's screenplay makes, envisioning an entire military court proceeding as political theater — to show those in the North that they mean business
about unity and to scare those in the South who might have
similar bloody thoughts.
For every stop motion performer
argument, there is a
similar argument going on
about voice - acting, and one more in the wings for stunt men and women.
I am a filmmaker and this is a
similar argument brought up
about what exactly makes you a filmmaker.
It seems to me that the main premise of your
argument is that «the casual reader» can not find reliable information
about eBook quality, which is what makes the market for new eBooks (there is no used eBooks market)
similar to that described by Akerlof.
While the US courts hear
arguments about alleged price fixing and anti-trust issues between Apple and five of the Big Six publishers» effort to reduce Amazon's hold on the ebook industry, a
similar investigation has been going on in the EU over the same accusations.
Note that a
similar argument regarding polar bears is often cited by AGW skeptics and even Alaska's governor in her recent NYT piece
about oil drilling.
In a recent editorial for The Guardian, Adam Corner made a
similar argument, asking «who cares
about the climate change consensus?».
When I look back into the archives, there is a discussion on the exact same topic in March 2005: https://climateaudit.org/2005/03/24/bristlecone-pines-again/ with the exact same
argument in the comments
about whether non-dendro to 1760 is «remarkably
similar» or not.
His
arguments about climate science strike a
similar tone.
I find this entire uproar strikingly
similar to the long - running
argument about dinosaur antecedants; particularly the Clemson view of dinosaurs as descended from the «cursorial crocs» as opposed to pretty much everyone else's view (now) that birds derive from coelurosaurs.
Well, that is all fine and good but I hope you can see that those of us who find the
similar claims made
about evolutionary theory and AGW by naysayers to both be wrong will not find this
argument very compelling.
Now, I am not suggesting you can make a strong
argument for this - the point is with such an absence of both data and theory - how can the possibility - or
similar speculations
about the other many unknowns - be said to be truly «excluded»?
This is
similar to the
argument Benoit Mandelbrot and Nassim Taleb made
about Mandelbrot's observation that fluctuations in markets for shares, futures, and commodities are not normally distributed but have fat tails: this means that standard risk - management practices (e.g., stress - testing portfolios) will fail to account properly for extremely unlikely events.
In fact, Diamond had a
similar argument in Collapse (
about the Rwandan genocide) to Flannery's take on Sudan.
Thinking
about this, I couldn't help but consider how
similar these
arguments are to the proper role of managing partners in Canadian law firms.
Indeed, I have argued that his
arguments against judicial review of legislation and Justice Scalia's in favour of limiting judicial review to the enforcement of the original meaning of the constitution are very
similar, and that, if anything, «Justice Scalia and his fellow originalists are guilty of failing to follow the logical implications of their own views
about the nature of the questions that arise in judicial review.
Children of Divorce — Provides numerous links for children and parents and includes sections on art activities, books, how to talk to parents
about divorce, what to do with anger
about divorce, coping with parental
arguments, and other
similar topics to help children feel less alone and more capable of handling divorce and the effects of divorce.
In making this
argument, Broker looked to California's anti-SLAPP statute, which, while
similar to Washington's, had been recently amended to exclude from its protection a business's statements
about competitors.
Similar to the
argument about buying a SFH vs a multi-unit buts its always great articles to read no matter what side of the debate you are on.