They also argue that forcing the women into arbitration would likewise force all others who might have
similar claims in the future to go through arbitration, greatly harming their ability to protect their rights.
The Supreme Court combined these three cases and ruled that the United States was not liable for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act and prevented soldiers from filing
similar claims in the future.
Not exact matches
Related: Why Bitcoin's
Future Is Bright With the security arm of Xapo well - established and thriving «as the largest custodian of bitcoin
in the world,» Casares
claims, his next quest is to bring bitcoin to remote, underserved communities throughout the world, places
similar to where he grew up, where access to money makes «the difference between having clothes for winter or not,» between eating and going hungry.
It would appear as though Houllier was playing the percentages, with the Frenchman
claiming after the game that he didn't feel whatever team he named would be good enough to beat Manchester City at Eastlands because so many have played far too many games this season, and even
claimed he would do something
similar again
in the
future without a moment's hesitation.
But it gave no guidelines to help others decide
in the
future if
similar claims should be allowed or not.
(Why does this sound so
similar to the
claim that models that can not forecast climate 10 years
in the
future should be trusted to be much more accurate at 100 year forecasts?)
However, given that the CAGW position doesn't rest on specific numbers, but is instead an unorganized collection of anecdotal evidence, coupled with heavily - tweaked computer models, unfounded assumptions about positive feedbacks, and a healthy imagination about possible
future disasters, a lower warming number for the 20th century will simply be brushed over with
claims about aerosols being stronger than previously thought, more warming still waiting
in the «pipeline» or
similar ad hoc «explanations» that keep the overall story alive.
While the Birmingham litigation, and numerous
similar claims, will continue to rumble on,
future claims are likely to be brought under the new, consolidated provisions contained within the Equality Act 2010, the bulk of which come into force
in October 2010.
The best way to do this is by filing a personal injury
claim, which may also prevent a
similar accident from happening
in the
future.
Watch this space to see the Employment Tribunal convulsing itself to serve both masters should a
similar claim hit the courts
in future.
At Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, we believe that making a difference
in one person's injury
claim can help prevent others from having
similar experiences
in the
future.
It is possible that
similar claims might be made
in future against other regulators
in the competition arena, whereas formerly claimants might have been expected to make their
claims in the Administrative Court or
in an ordinary civil court.
Additionally, by bringing a
claim, you may be helping to prevent
similar injuries from occurring to countless others
in the
future by forcing the company to make sweeping safety changes.
If other
similar policyholders to you are experiencing high
claims, then it is more likely that you will also have a
claim in the
future.
1) Kotak with
claim settlement ratio of 92 % and good solvency ratio and premium of rs. 11736 Kotak has a consistent
claim settlement ratio of above 90 % for 3 consecutive years 2) PNB metlife with
similar claim settlement ratio of Kotak and same premium of rs. 11781 PNB is a big nationalised bank and Metlife is one of the largest insurance companies
in the world 3) Aegon life with
claim settlement ratio of 89 % and premium of rs. 11172 Aegon is
in partnership with bennett coleman company which is a times group company Aegon doesn't have a very good
claim settlement ratio
in the past but by paying an additional premium of 500rs you can get a waiver of
future premiums on discovery of critical illness.