I made
similar comments on another thread; it really seems to be a mess with the season fast approaching, unprepared, I agree.
Not exact matches
I am also struck, catching up
on the
comments,
on how
similar all the arguments of the supporters of Tony are
on this
thread: 1.
that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas
on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas
on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000
comments on this
thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see
on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other
similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....
I just posted a short
comment with
similar numbers (including some extrapolations
on pages / borrow read)
on the
thread at Kboards, which will probably get shredded by all the Chicken Littles over there
(1) In response to Bob's
comments, I did make
on this
thread essentially the same amended material freely available for download elsewhere, with numerous accompanying graphs AND ALSO Benny Peiser (quickly) published a
similar article submitted by me in toto
on CCNet.
So why do you think that Judith does not come out and criticize McKitrick for his
comment (I would think that by now she is aware of his having made that statement) or the abundant
similar comments form «skeptics»
on these past two
threads?
In a
comment on a Facebook - book
thread, Miriam Robinson said she is no longer using the terms climate change, global warming, or
similar.
So why do you think that Judith does not come out and criticize [Joshua] for his [ceaseless, recurrent, unvarying, repetitive, interminable, persistent, unending, oft - repeated, perpetual, running]
comment [s][regarding «Judith's imbalance»]... or the abundant
similar comments from [Robert, settledscience, Martha, et al.]
on [virtually every
thread on this blog]?
In addition, Laarakker left a
comment on an Internet discussion
thread about a
similar letter from Martin.