Not exact matches
At least, our experience
of the animals with whom we live is that they exhibit
behaviors similar to many
of our own; that those
behaviors clearly seem to be signs
of emotional and mental qualities familiar to us from our own knowledge
of ourselves; that animals possess distinctive individual traits, characteristics that are irreducibly personal (even if we feel obliged to recoil from that word on metaphysical principle), their own peculiar affections and aversions, expectations and fears; that many beasts command certain rational skills; and that all
of this makes some
kind of natural appeal to our moral sense.
In a study published in Nature, geneticist Andrés Bendesky
of Harvard University and his colleagues worked with two
kinds of mice that are genetically
similar but differ in their pairing
behavior: a subspecies
of oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus) form monogamous pairs, whereas deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) mate with multiple partners.
«Our results raise the interesting possibility that there's a genetic toolkit for this
kind of behavior,» he says — a set
of genes that have been used at several points in evolution to come up with
similar behaviors.
With
similar negotiations coming up with other publishers, Amazon decided to take a hard line in order to nip this
kind of behavior in the bud.
It's a simple fact, unfortunately, that large - breed dogs are capable
of doing much more serious damage than smaller ones — a Yorkie or Chihuahua will never cause the
kind of severe injuries that a German shepherd or Rottweiler can, even if their aggressive
behavior is otherwise very
similar.
Atwood says he wants to use a badge system for rewards (something Huffington Post also uses), but Gawker founder Nick Denton said in an interview last year that a
similar reward system his sites used was a «terrible mistake,» because it was easily gamed and encouraged the wrong
kinds of behavior.