Sentences with phrase «simple point a-to-point»

Leica has an almost legendary status among photography enthusiasts, but it tends to be expensive — a simple point - and - shoot model starts at $ 700.

Although their tactics may differ, each of these brokers is making a simple point: When the going gets tough, the tough sales associates keep going — right down to the last day of the year.

The simple point being that the subject of «commission» is really quite incidental to the subject of «competence»!

My simple point really is that employers are interested in what you can deliver for their organisation and not so much in what you did.

In the simple point & click world of online applications, many people apply to hundreds of jobs whether they are qualified or not, in the hopes that they might get lucky.

The Mate 10 camera takes very good shots in a simple point - and - shoot scenario, with a little variation.

There appear to have been some reported connectivity issues with Android Wear 2.0 and the first few iterations of iOS 11, but that just drives home the simple point in all this - iOS users are much better served by an Apple Watch, while Android users are much better served by an Android Wear watch.

The issue with the TabPro S is one that's easily boiled down to a simple point.

It's meant to be a simple point and shoot.

All it takes to map an area is a simple point and shoot, and the app does the rest of hard work stitching the image together.

Hackers have moved away from simple point - of - sale (POS) terminal attacks to more refined assaults on corporations» head offices.

The device comes with a Beautify 4.0 Technology that makes an intelligent adjustment to the pictures by simple point - and - shoot.

If you keep reading, we've got the instructions on how to uninstall these built - in apps using the command line, but if that's not your style, you can always use the CleanMyPC uninstaller tool to remove them with a simple point - and - click interface.

The Touch Mouse allows you to interact with your Windows 7 PC in a more intuitive way beyond the simple point - and - click.

Navigating through the Daydream app store with the headset on was a breeze; it's amazing how much — with the addition of a simple IMU - based motion controller — more natural the user - interaction is with the simple point - and - click interface of Daydream, compared to Gear VR's awkward head - mounted touchpad (or even a gamepad).

We bring this up in our defensive driving classes to make a very simple point: any reduction in speed can reduce your force of impact in a crash.

Remember this simple point: «Any life insurance plan which pays money before a policyholder dies can be best avoided.»

It is however, very useful in making a simple point that many consumers fail to understand — life insurance as a death benefit is a «good deal».

This, however, «misses a rather simple point... the standard of protection given to individuals by the German Basic Law is greater and less flexible than that given by the ECHR».

In contrast to my market - related argument from last November, I write this post to make the simple point that the discovery - related amendments to the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure are a practice - related reason to engage in... [more]

«Law departments struggle with these compilations of information because lawyers do not want to expose their ideas — lest they be criticized, perhaps; or they claim they do not have time, which really means that they do not see the payoff justifying their effort; or they are hobbled by technology, even down to the simple point of not being able to type proficiently.»

In contrast to my market - related argument from last November, I write this post to make the simple point that the discovery - related amendments to the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure are a practice - related reason to engage in systematic discovery planning and management.

It exists as an iOS app, but you might find it more useful in its bookmarklet form, because the simple point of the «game» is to destroy websites, element by element.

In response to Brad Beeson, the central and simple point I make is that the trend in CO2 concentration remains a long way short of the least trend projected by the IPCC on its A2 emissions scenario, which comes close to today's emissions.

I'm making the simple point that Donald Rapp is wrong to claim that the allegations are absurd on their face because Wegman stood to gain nothing.

This simple point is you are mistaken in the context represented.

The simple point is that we're perfectly entitled to make these judgements when deciding what we should do.

This paper largely makes a very simple point - if you have 100 scientists, 97 of them agree with the tenets of anthropogenic climate change and their research is well supported.

This is the very simple point that, from my reading on this subject over the years, is NEVER addressed.

It's such a simple point that it's been lost on me until now.

The simple point is that these mechanisms warm and cool the planet alternately in the instrumental record.

My simple point is that there is compelling evidence to show that AGW is happening and will likely to be serious for ecosystems and humans.

Maybe because your simple point was trivial and self - evident.

Just a shame that in all your condemnation of what you think I wrote to so inflame you, you don't actually appear to have grasped my central simple point.

On this simple point, there is no debate.

And all of the above is without taking into consideration the very simple point that if we are way above the carrying capacity of the planet at present, with a billion people living a western lifestyle, then if 10 billion people are to be living a western lifestyle, we will need another 6 or 7 planets to provide for them, which is not possible.

But this simple point seems to have eluded a lot of people so far.

That's my simple point.

John A is wrong, too, because he, like you, is missing one simple point (though different points).

My simple point is why not spend a much smaller ammount on research and hopefully new technology and as a by product we may just reduce our emissions as well.

It seems to be a very simple point.

I don't know why it seems impossible for you to so much as acknowledge this simple point.

In an article challenging concern about deforestation in the Amazon, Stott told the New York Post that «the simple point is that there are now still - despite what humans have done - more rainforests today than there were 12,000 years ago.»

Why is this simple point, capable of being understood by a class of 7 year olds, so difficult for supposedly «clever» academic types to accept?

In other words, Joshua created a strawman in which he conflated two things (he has previously said shouldn't be conflated) and appealed to an authority that disagrees with him... because he doesn't understand an incredibly simple point.

And I would absolutely NEVER say to you, about a matter of artificial intelligence, «It is a simple point that I should not have bothered spending so much time on, you should get it.»

If you find it difficult to understand this simple point, then I fear that I would have very little confidence in any «science» you cared to present.

All of your fluffing around with claiming I don't understand ecology and ecosystems is designed to obfuscate that simple point.

Professor Jane Kelsey of the law faculty at the University of Auckland provides a more complete analysis of the draft TPP regulatory coherence chapter, and makes one simple point that sums it up, saying it «has nothing to do with trade.»

When a group of people claiming superior scientific knowledge and understanding refuses to grasp the extremely simple point I've been making regarding the heating capacity of an absence of volcanic eruptions, then I am forced to take all their other arguments with a huge grain of salt.