Regarding conspiracy theories, the author says: «A likely function of this cognitive bias is to help people make sense of the world by offering
simple explanations for complex events.»
«The supposed Younger Dryas impact fails on both theoretical and empirical grounds,» says Meltzer, who adds that the popular appeal of the hypothesis is probably due to the way that it provides «
simple explanations for complex problems.»
It seems to me that blaming humans for global warming is
a simple explanation for a complex event.
Not exact matches
This is just one example of the many problems that must be overcome in order to find a «natural»
explanation for the evolution of
complex organisms from
simpler ones.
Thinking is a passionate indictment of
simple explanations — «the urge to insist that the
complex is just a disguise
for the
simple was one of the plagues of the Twentieth Century» — whilst simultaneously broadening and complicating the terms of many of these debates.
«WIMPs emerged as a
simple, elegant, compelling
explanation for a
complex phenomenon,» Kolb says.
«And
for every
complex phenomenon there is a
simple, elegant, compelling
explanation that is wrong.»
Dr. Cate breaks
complex biological reactions into
simple and easy to understand
explanations and I think that Deep Nutrition will be a life - changing book
for many people.
All these are
complex carbohydrates, which release their energy more slowly than
simple carbohydrates (
for a detailed
explanation of the two, see this article).
It contains
explanations and tools
for learning and practicing dozens of math - related exercises, from
simple functions to
complex calculus.
«While this boom / bust pattern is familiar to macroeconomists, who have developed
complex models
for generating business cycles, there may be a
simpler explanation based on human behavior.
A single Ptolemaic epicycle might be a very
simple explanation for a pattern in astronomy, but that doesn't make it better than a more
complex Newtonian gravitational interaction.
«We've seen, from the tutorial we've been examining [https://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/hafemeister.cfm], that the physics of climate change, regardless of how sound each step in the process might seem, is far too
complex to satisfy Occam's Razor — we have no way of knowing whether a
simpler explanation might account equally well or better
for the known physical interactions.
While everyone looks
for complex psychological
explanations for confirmation bias etc., the
simple truth is that there is nothing new in the climate debate.