Parental choice in education is a matter
of simple justice, and for many poor parents it is a matter of survival.
Our favorite reported quotes come from Greenfield, the author of the consistently good
Simple Justice blog, who cast off this gem: â $ œGeneration Y uses this term life - balance as an excuse for their incompetence.â $
Scott Greenfield wrote
on Simple Justice that new bloggers looking to him to provide them with undeserved attention and recognition have
The firestorm started with
Simple Justice blogger Scott Greenfield's post criticizing John Stossel's commentary that lawyers are parasites ruining America.
The best single article I've seen on the moral case for parental choice in education is «School Choice
as Simple Justice,» published in First Things (April 1992) and written by Prof. John Coons of the law school of the University of California, Berkeley.
There are also lots of mentions of internet website blogs, an ominous - sounding Link Network conspiracy, and allegations that Scott Greenfield makes truckloads of money
from Simple Justice, despite his frequent assertions to the contrary.
Ann is implying that the proprietor of
Simple Justice provided that commenter with her email address, a strange allegation and totally irrelevant to this post and having nothing to do with Randazza.
I think there is truth here in that the poor, the black, and the oppressed generally are occupied — and rightly so — with a most urgent social struggle
for simple justice.
In Simple Justice, his seminal study of the history of Brown v. Board of Education, historian Richard Kluger observed,
According to Richard Kluger, author of a history of the Brown case
entitled Simple Justice, the boycotting parents rallied behind Bishop's leadership and formed the Consolidated Parents group, whose ranks included my mother and her close friends Marie Smith (my friend Alonzo's mother) and Burma Whitted.
While Charon QC seems sympathetic to Molyneux, Scott H. Greenfield at
Simple Justice believes the magistrate exceeded the bounds of propriety:
For example, Ernie the Attorney graciously directed readers to vote for Appellate Blog or Overlawyered, while Scott Greenfield of
Simple Justice urges colleagues to vote for anyone but him.
Then he humbly made a reference to his work at
Simple Justice now being «part of the old, forgotten blawgosphere» (obviously not true), thanked everyone for reading and keeping him honest, linked to some video that I didn't watch about a dolphin «thanking everyone for all the fish,» and wrapped up post number 4,744.
** Going forward I believe the importance of any single event should be evaluated by whether or not it prompts Scott Greenfield to
re-open Simple Justice for a post, i.e., does the event meet «The Greenfield Test.»
Scott Greenfield at
Simple Justice shares his personal experience of missing out on a position in the Spitzer administration.
In addition to criticizing AP's policy generally, Scott Greenfield of
Simple Justice raises a practical concern: Precisely how many words of content exceeds fair use?
Scott Greenfield of
Simple Justice takes issue with trolls and complainers griping about blawgs just to hear themselves gripe.
Scott Greenfield, who writes the
brilliant Simple Justice, asked (via Twitter) bloggers to blog about programs that use wreaths to honor those who died in the service to their country.
After thousands of posts
on Simple Justice, and probably tens (or hundreds) of thousands of comments on his posts, Greenfield can sometimes see what is coming before he hits the publish button.
Not surprisingly, Scott Greenfield, the blogosphere's most prolific law blogger (if you don't believe me, then take a look at his monthly archives in the left menu bar of his blog) has
done Simple Justice to Blawg Review # 170.
However this discussion develops, the way to get the moral questions into clear focus begins with a careful reading of John Coons» «School Choice
as Simple Justice.»
'' Spitting Bullets Is Deadly
from Simple Justice And once again, the Great Sovereign Nation of Texas competes with the State of Florida for which does the stupidest things.
at 6543 (remarks of Sen. Humphrey)(«
Simple justice requires that public funds, to which all taxpayers of all races contribute, not be spent in any fashion which encourages, entrenches, subsidizes, or results in racial discrimination»»)(quoting from President Kennedy's Message to Congress, June 19, 1963).