Sentences with phrase «simple logical fallacy»

It is all based on a simple logical fallacy.

Not exact matches

It is this false claim made by so many, particularly in more fundamental religious communities, that is being challenged by this simple illustration of the logical fallacy of such a view.

Your logical fallacy appears to be that which is called «the excluded middle»: In simple terms you are claiming that since I am wrong, you must be right.

read up on quantum mechanics and tell me that sounds more realistic then the notion of a being of superior knowledge manipulating the elements of earth to create sentient man... its a logical fallacy... if we can do what we can do in a universe four billion years old, simple statistics demands than someone else would have done it beforehand, especially if we had «evlved» so drastically in a cosmic blink of an eye, as the prophet richard dawkins likes to put it.

You mean so she can continue to be confused by all the contradictions and logical fallacies of this supposedly «divinely inspired» book written by people with no concept of simple things like the chlorophyll in plants that make them green?

This process model of divine spacetime, projected from Whitehead's theory of interpoints and his critique of the Newtonian fallacy of «simple location,» slips into the logical difficulty with which process theology has accused traditional theism: It is always possible to ask whether any proposed empirical signs are signs of God, and it is never possible to provide empirical evidence with which to answer the question (1:42).

Thus, Bergson's proto - mentalism is also interpretable as the positive face of the critique of simple location.4 The fallacy of simple location is the basis for the view, in both physical and logical atomism, that the «individuality of the atom [and of objects in general] is based precisely on its [or their] ontological separation from other simply located entities» (BMP 309).

A prize numpty holds a belief with such confidence that up - thread (@ 238) he brands argument that contradict this belief as comprising a «logical fallacy» and that as the argument in question is «very simple» (which indeed it is), he is suggesting those contradicting this belief are either fools or rogues or both.

«Willis builds a strawman Willis makes a logical fallacy known as the strawman fallacy here, when he says: The current climate paradigm says that the surface air temperature is a linear function of the «forcing»... Change in Temperature (∆ T) = Change in Forcing (∆ F) times Climate Sensitivity What he seems to have done is taking an equation relating to a simple energy balance model (probably from this Wikipedia entry) and applied it to the much more complex climate system.