Sentences with phrase «simple man in»

I'm richard a single and simple man in itz best.

I am a simple man in my 50s, I am kind, considerate, generous, easy going, funny, driven and ambitious - lets be honest, I am not going to write anything negative, am I?

I'm a simple man in the beautiful country of the Philippines.

Con: It is messy and would open the door for Unfrozen Caveman Analyst («I'm just a simple man in this complex world.

Tell that professor he missed the lesson, but the simple man in So Cal not only got it, he taught his family and they got it too.

The same rule will apply to find the simple men in line.

Not exact matches

The Times» foray into meal kits follows Men's Health, which partnered with Chef'd for a similar deal last year, and Real Simple and Cooking Light, which partnered with Plated in 2014.

For those looking for a deep dive into the subject, there are long lists of skills to acquire or outlines of multistep training programs to follow, but if you're more interested in simple but powerful changes that you can make today, a recent post on blog Dumb Little Man is for you.

Arkad, the richest man in Babylon, asks a very simple math question to his students: What would happen if, every day, you added 10 coins to your purse but only spent nine?

The work is notable for its depiction of the elaborately detailed clothing favoured by 18th - century French aristocrats, but look closely at the young man in the foreground and you'll see he's wearing a pair of remarkably simple black dress shoes.

According to studies conducted by researchers in the U.K. and Turkey, something as simple as the suit a man wears can have a direct impact on how people view his character.

Economists treat parental leave, both for women and men, as a simple cost - benefit problem: in theory, at least, if a woman's wage is greater than the cost of replacing her in the home, then she should spend her time working and hire someone else to care for her children.

The three men developed a simple strategy that enabled them to evaluate and upgrade Bunn Coffee's financial systems: set priorities by identifying inadequacies in current systems and analyzing the cash - flow cycle for ways to free cash for future growth, then set up new systems that will be both cost - efficient and flexible enough to accommodate expansion.

In the simplest possible terms, these men bet that mortgage holders would default.

That's it, just three simple investing rules that helped Graham outperform the market for 20 years during his career and have helped Warren Buffett become one of the richest men in the world.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

Jesus was an illiterate Jewish peasant / carpenter / simple, dirty (a new book), sometimes sick (the same book) preacher man who suffered from hallucinations (or «mythicizing» from P, M, M, L and J) and who has been characterized anywhere from the Messiah from Nazareth to a mythical character from mythical Nazareth to a ma - mzer from Nazareth (Professor Bruce Chilton, in his book Rabbi Jesus).

In the Bible, a man named Nicodemus asked Jesus how to get to Heaven — and Jesus told Him he must be born - again - it was that simple.

Several weeks back there was a bit of a dust - up in conservative Reformed Protestant circles over the following simple question: Does being a man or a woman have any ethical significance for the way we live together in civil society?

But moral progress, the realm of freedom, is a quite different matter: «Yet in the field of ethical awareness and moral decision - making, there is no similar possibility of accumulation [incremental progress] for the simple reason that man's freedom is always new and he must always make his decisions anew.

To have faith in man's ability to do good is much simpler in elegance and much more feasible than to have faith in an unseen force directing you and the people around you to do good.

It was really eye opening for me — simple insights like the fact that the first wound most men receive in being circumcised is an intentional act of violence commanded by God — the goal of which is to place his mark upon us, reminding us that we are set apart and specially chosen by him.

As a Baptist minister, the older I get... the more I study Scripture... the less I know about Scripture and about God... and the more I teach the simple basics: Man is a sinner in need of a Saviour and guide for both this life and the next, «Come.»

@ Catholic Mom succession of Popes lol... can we say brainwashed... look it's simple you go by the word not man... NEVER PUT YOUR FAITH IN MANman... NEVER PUT YOUR FAITH IN MANMAN...

Or how was a man named David, a simple shepherd at one time some 3,000 years ago, able to specify that we are formed by means of a set of detailed instruction within our DNA, that makes each of us unique, saying: «Your (God's) eyes saw even the embryo (up through 56 days after conception) of me, and in your book (the instructions in DNA) all its parts were down in writing, as regards the days when they were formed and there was not yet one (organ) among them»?

Jesus was an illiterate Jewish peasant / carpenter / simple preacher man who suffered from hallucinations (or «mythicizing» from P, M, M, L and J) and who has been characterized anywhere from the Messiah from Nazareth to a mythical character from mythical Nazareth to a mamzer from Nazareth (Professor Bruce Chilton, in his book Rabbi Jesus).

One of these that remains in my memory was a time when this simple man, who complained to his confessor that he does not know how to speak, talked late into the night about the nature of God and indeed what life with God is.

I believe there was a 1st century CE, Jewish, simple, preacher - man who was conceived by a Jewish carpenter named Joseph living in Nazareth and born of a young Jewish girl named Mary.

Seems like if something as simple as «thou shat not steal» is a commandment meant to protect men's property made in the top ten commandments, why wouldn't he put in a commandment to protect our children?

For me, it is as simple as this: would a man in the exact same situation be treated with more or less value than I, as a woman, in the exact same situation?

Davis» latest production is a simple retelling of the story of Jesus of Nazareth through the eyes of Mary, who leaves behind the security of her family in order to follow a man she believes to be the Messiah.

Neither were they «minimizers,» in the sense that they were willing to make the Christian faith an easy and simple thing which would appeal to any «man of good will.»

And the reason for this is simple: Jesus was not less than the Jewish Messiah, or than the apocalyptic «Son of Man» seen in visions and dreams by his worshipers; (Rev. 1 - 13; Acts 7:56; etc.) he was — and is — in fact far more.

There was a 1st century CE, Jewish, simple, preacher - man who was conceived by a Jewish carpenter named Joseph living in Nazareth and born of a young Jewish girl named Mary.

It reflects the theology of those who thought of Jesus exclusively in apocalyptic terms, and were prepared not only to go through the tradition and substitute «the Son of Man» for his simple «I,» but also to insert appropriate quotations or paraphrases of their favorite apocalyptic texts in order to give his life its appropriate setting — as they assumed — and his teaching its proper interpretation.

Obviously that millions of innocent people died because simple - minded men are in power and yield control over groups of other simple - minded men who do their bidding... see Hitler and the Nazis, Stalin and the Soviet police, etc...

Plain and simple, the young man felt uncomfortable being put in the postion of having to potentiantially «grab» the female in a disrepectful way.

Had Brown not been cut down, he may have grown into a more life affirming position; perhaps as an internationally renowned neurosurgeon, a nationally syndicated newscaster, a White House cabinet member, a military general, a preacher of the Gospel, or perhaps as a simple and ordinary man who loves his wife and leads his family well, like so many who sit in our congregations every Sunday.

Then, too, demons used to deceive men's minds by taking up their abode in springs or rivers or trees or stones and imposing upon simple people by their frauds.

What other writer, having just finished Moby - Dick and standing at the peak of his powers, would have taken in his next book a simple story about a young man's descent in the city and compounded it into the unreadable, pseudo-Hawthornian mess of Pierre?

This was badly needed, because the Cathars were making great inroads, appealing to Catholics who saw in them men and women who were living a simple life, many of them in great austerity, and with a spirituality that met an evident thirst among the faithful.

«first reaction [was] that this is not a simple witchhunt against gays, but that the main point of the document is to identify potential clerical sex abusers (most of whom have in the past been gay men).

When to his observation that, though he liked the main thrust of my Man's Vision of God he failed to find in it any discussion of sin, I replied «I have a paragraph on sin,» his comment was a simple, «A paragraph!»

Our starting point could be the simple anthropological fact that woman easily arouses sensuality in man; man less easily in woman.

Christ came among men with a simple ministry of teaching whose main purpose was to confirm that the kinds of ways in which God had been understood in Natural religion, and the very language used to express those insights, were broadly right.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

With a certain simplification of the state of affairs, which however brings out more clearly the decisive factor without falsifying it, we might say that formerly the object and situation of a man's action were simply data supplied by nature with which he was in contact and by simple human realities which recurred from generation to generation again and again.

The real hero of our time is the nonhero, the common man, the little Charlie Chaplin, the Dustin Hoffman, who may be buffeted and bewildered and often caught in the struggle between Eagles and Serpents, Seagulls and Frogs, but who somehow through it all manages to remain relatively sane, simple, ordinary and human.

To Eric.G, to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image».

But if this were the case, then the point of the parable must have been comparatively obvious and simple to grasp, that is, to and for men who stood in the situation of the hearers of Jesus.